RIEM News LogoRIEM News

Articles tagged with "electricity-rates"

  • Ontario’s Nuclear Rate Shock Reveals a Deeper Affordability Problem - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses Ontario Power Generation’s (OPG) request to the Ontario Energy Board for a significant increase in regulated nuclear payment amounts, particularly a more than 40% jump in 2027. This increase raises the weighted average regulated payment from about $78/MWh in 2026 to roughly $110/MWh in 2027, driven mainly by the nuclear payment amount nearly doubling from $111/MWh to $207/MWh. However, this does not translate to a 40% increase in typical household electricity bills; OPG estimates an increase of about $8 per month (5.6%) on a typical $142 bill. The difference arises because electricity bills include multiple charges beyond generation, such as transmission and distribution, which do not increase at the same rate. The sharp rise in nuclear payment amounts is primarily due to a planned drop in nuclear output in 2027 caused by refurbishment outages at Darlington and conservative assumptions about Pickering’s availability during life extension. Since nuclear plants

    energynuclear-energyelectricity-ratesOntario-Power-Generationenergy-affordabilitypower-generationenergy-policy
  • Arkansas PSC Opens Door For Higher Electricity Bills - CleanTechnica

    The Arkansas Public Service Commission (PSC), with three governor-appointed commissioners, has approved a 23% electricity rate increase for customers of SWEPCO in Northwest Arkansas. This decision, made amid public opposition—including over 600 comments and two hours of testimony—aims in part to support the aging Flint Creek coal plant, which is nearly 50 years old and considered costly, polluting, and increasingly prone to mechanical failure. While the PSC acknowledged public concerns and ordered SWEPCO to report on plans for retiring Flint Creek and managing regional load growth, the rate hike will nonetheless raise electricity bills significantly. Environmental advocates, such as the Sierra Club, criticize the PSC’s ruling for perpetuating reliance on an outdated coal plant rather than transitioning to cheaper, cleaner renewable energy sources like solar and wind, which have become more affordable alongside declining battery storage costs. They highlight the health and economic harms caused by coal pollution and emphasize that Arkansas residents have already borne substantial costs over decades to maintain Flint Creek. The Sierra Club

    energyelectricity-ratescoal-plantrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-powerbattery-storage
  • A Long-Term Take On California's Net Metering Policies - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses California’s evolving net metering policies, focusing on the transition to “Net Metering 3.0” and its long-term implications. A former electrician in California’s power industry provides a critical perspective, describing the new policy as a financial gain for utilities at the expense of residential solar customers. Under earlier net metering rules, residential solar owners could offset their electricity use on a near one-to-one basis, effectively reducing their bills to zero if their solar production matched their consumption. Utilities benefited by acquiring excess solar power at low fixed rates and reselling it at higher commercial rates during peak demand, creating a mutually beneficial arrangement. However, with Net Metering 3.0, utilities pay solar customers closer to wholesale rates for excess power, significantly reducing the financial value of residential solar systems. Customers can no longer fully offset their electricity bills due to lower compensation for surplus energy and the introduction of fixed monthly grid connection charges. This shift devalues residential solar investments, requiring larger and more expensive

    energynet-meteringsolar-powerCalifornia-energy-policyphotovoltaic-systemselectricity-ratesutility-companies
  • Connecticut Struggles To Reconcile The High Cost Of Electricity With A Push For Renewables

    energyrenewable-energyelectricity-ratessolar-incentivesnuclear-powerenergy-legislationConnecticut