RIEM News LogoRIEM News

Articles tagged with "energy-policy"

  • Von optimistischen Modellen zu leeren Pipelines: Die intellektuelle Geschichte von Deutschlands Wasserstoff-Backbone* - CleanTechnica

    The article traces the intellectual history behind Germany's hydrogen backbone infrastructure, emphasizing that the physical pipeline network is the visible outcome of a long period of optimistic modeling and policy-driven assumptions rather than a straightforward technical project. For years, studies and analyses portrayed hydrogen as not only plausible but necessary for large-scale energy use, extending its traditional industrial roles into general energy applications. However, these studies systematically overlooked or downplayed the significant challenges and energy losses involved in hydrogen production, distribution, storage, and utilization, leading to overly positive cost and efficiency assumptions. Key failures arose from stacking multiple optimistic assumptions—such as low electrolyzer investment costs, underestimated electricity prices, and simplified or omitted costs for compression, storage, and pipeline operation—without critical peer review. This created a distorted picture of hydrogen’s viability as a flexible energy carrier comparable to electricity. In reality, the energy conversion chain for hydrogen is marked by substantial losses, with often less than 30% of the original electrical energy reaching the end-use application. The normalization

    energyhydrogenenergy-infrastructureenergy-storageenergy-lossesenergy-transportenergy-policy
  • Importierte Materialien sind beherrschbar, importierte Energie bepreist Volkswirtschaften neu - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica analyzes the 2022 European gas crisis, emphasizing that its core issue was not general import dependence or shortages of industrial inputs, but the reliance on an imported energy source—natural gas—that set marginal prices in electricity and heating markets. Although gas was not the dominant energy source, its position as the marginal fuel meant that soaring gas prices triggered widespread increases in electricity and heating costs, leading to inflation, fiscal interventions by governments totaling hundreds of billions of euros, and tighter monetary policies. Unlike industrial inputs such as iron or ammonia, whose price shocks affect specific sectors, energy prices propagate rapidly and broadly through wholesale markets, consumer tariffs, and industrial contracts, impacting the entire economy. The crisis demonstrated that physical supply shortages were managed through demand reduction, storage withdrawals, and alternative supplies, but the economic damage stemmed from price spikes. Governments had to implement price caps and subsidies to prevent social and industrial collapse because energy prices simultaneously affect all economic actors. This dynamic has implications for hydrogen's role

    energyenergy-pricesgas-crisisenergy-marketseconomic-impactenergy-import-dependencyenergy-policy
  • Trump Goes Zero for Five Against Offshore Wind - CleanTechnica

    The Trump administration faced a significant legal setback when all five offshore wind projects it attempted to halt through stop-work orders successfully challenged these actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. These projects, which were over 40 percent complete—most notably Vineyard Wind off Massachusetts, nearly 95 percent finished and already supplying power—were abruptly stopped by the Department of the Interior in December. The halts disrupted billion-dollar projects, paused construction jobs during a critical time, and impeded progress toward clean energy goals. However, the courts consistently ruled in favor of the offshore wind initiatives, underscoring judicial resistance to the administration’s efforts to impede renewable energy development. Environmental advocates, including the Sierra Club, condemned the administration’s actions as attempts to favor fossil fuels over clean energy and emphasized the importance of offshore wind for a sustainable, affordable, and reliable energy future. They highlighted the economic and environmental benefits of projects like Sunrise Wind, which employs hundreds of local workers and is expected to power hundreds of

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyclean-energywind-powerenergy-policysustainable-energy
  • Deutschlands Wasserstoffstrategie verzögerte die Elektrifizierung, indem sie die Arbeitskräfte in die falsche Richtung lenkte - CleanTechnica

    The article critiques Germany's hydrogen strategy, arguing that it has delayed the country's electrification efforts by misdirecting workforce development and training priorities. Germany's decision to establish a regulated hydrogen pipeline infrastructure—framed as a long-term, central national asset—sent strong signals to regulators, industry, and educational institutions. This led to significant investments in hydrogen-related vocational training, certifications, and organizational restructuring within transmission system operators (TSOs) and other stakeholders. For example, a major German gas TSO invested around €10 million in a hydrogen training center focused on pipeline operation, maintenance, and safety, reflecting a belief in hydrogen's central role in the energy transition. While hydrogen-related skills largely build on existing technical professions such as electricians and engineers, the article emphasizes that these training efforts come with opportunity costs. Limited training time and institutional focus mean that resources devoted to hydrogen competencies detract from investments in electrification technologies like wind turbines, solar panels, heat pumps, and batteries. The author argues that Germany's

    energyhydrogen-strategyelectrificationrenewable-energy-integrationenergy-policyworkforce-developmentinfrastructure-planning
  • Ontario’s Nuclear Rate Shock Reveals a Deeper Affordability Problem - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses Ontario Power Generation’s (OPG) request to the Ontario Energy Board for a significant increase in regulated nuclear payment amounts, particularly a more than 40% jump in 2027. This increase raises the weighted average regulated payment from about $78/MWh in 2026 to roughly $110/MWh in 2027, driven mainly by the nuclear payment amount nearly doubling from $111/MWh to $207/MWh. However, this does not translate to a 40% increase in typical household electricity bills; OPG estimates an increase of about $8 per month (5.6%) on a typical $142 bill. The difference arises because electricity bills include multiple charges beyond generation, such as transmission and distribution, which do not increase at the same rate. The sharp rise in nuclear payment amounts is primarily due to a planned drop in nuclear output in 2027 caused by refurbishment outages at Darlington and conservative assumptions about Pickering’s availability during life extension. Since nuclear plants

    energynuclear-energyelectricity-ratesOntario-Power-Generationenergy-affordabilitypower-generationenergy-policy
  • How an Influential Energy Book Became a Drag on Decarbonization - CleanTechnica

    The article critiques the continued reliance on David MacKay’s 2008 book *Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air* as a definitive guide for energy policy in 2026, arguing that while the book was influential and valuable in its time, it no longer reflects current realities in energy systems. MacKay’s insistence on rigorous numerical analysis and physical constraints helped clarify the scale of energy challenges and the need for infrastructure to replace fossil fuels. However, his foundational approach, which anchored analysis in primary energy accounting, inadvertently exaggerated the scale of the problem by treating fossil fuel heat content as the baseline, thus underestimating the transformative potential of electrification and efficiency gains from technologies like electric vehicles and heat pumps. The article further highlights that MacKay’s assessment of renewable energy sources like solar and wind was accurate given the technology and costs of the late 2000s, but it failed to anticipate the dramatic cost reductions and performance improvements that have since occurred. By the early 2020s, solar and

    energydecarbonizationsustainable-energynuclear-powerelectrificationrenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Fighting Back: Utilities Challenge Coal Power Plant Emergency

    The article discusses the controversy surrounding the U.S. Department of Energy's emergency orders to keep aging coal power plants operational, despite the declining role of coal in U.S. power generation. Since the early 2000s, coal's share has dropped significantly, with natural gas and renewables like wind and solar gaining prominence. By 2023, coal accounted for only 19% of U.S. power generation, while renewables reached 21%, with projections indicating further growth in renewable energy. Utilities have been planning the retirement of old coal plants, including the Craig Unit 1 plant in Colorado, co-owned by Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and Platte River Power Authority, which was scheduled to retire at the end of 2025. However, just before the planned retirement, the two utilities received an emergency order to keep the coal plant running for an additional 90 days. Both utilities, which are member-owned rural cooperatives, have pushed back, requesting a hearing and relief from the order

    energycoal-powerrenewable-energyutilitiespower-generationenergy-policyenergy-emergency
  • Intersolar & Energy Storage North America Unveils Interactive Programming to Enhance Education and Networking - CleanTechnica

    Intersolar & Energy Storage North America (IESNA), the leading U.S. tradeshow and conference series for solar, energy storage, EV infrastructure, and manufacturing, announced interactive onsite programming for its flagship event scheduled for February 18-20, 2026, at the San Diego Convention Center. The event aims to enhance education, collaboration, and networking among clean energy professionals amid industry challenges such as administrative hurdles and rapid load growth. Key programming includes workshops on reducing construction costs, strategic deployment of distributed energy resources, trade policy and supply chain strategies, and political outlooks on permitting and domestic manufacturing. Additionally, attendees can engage in virtual reality experiences and access half-day training sessions offered by industry certification bodies and experts. IESNA’s flagship event serves as a platform for professionals across the clean energy value chain to build relationships, share insights, and develop progressive frameworks. The event also features keynote presentations and sessions co-hosted with organizations like Clean Coalition, addressing critical topics such as grid constraints and resilience benefits

    energysolar-energyenergy-storageclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-infrastructureenergy-policy
  • US to build ‘integrated’ nuclear sites with advanced reactors, fuel cycle

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) to identify states interested in hosting Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses. These campuses aim to modernize the domestic nuclear fuel cycle by creating integrated regional hubs that encompass the entire nuclear energy value chain—from fuel fabrication and enrichment to reprocessing used fuel and waste management. The initiative seeks to establish voluntary federal-state partnerships that align with regional economic goals and support long-term energy infrastructure, enhancing national energy security and fostering economic growth. Beyond fuel cycle activities, the campuses are planned to host advanced nuclear reactors and power generation facilities, providing reliable baseload energy to support advanced manufacturing and data centers. The DOE invites states to submit detailed proposals outlining their strategic priorities, scope of activities, funding models, and risk-sharing approaches. The financial framework emphasizes leveraging private and state capital, with federal support being targeted, conditional, and time-limited to protect taxpayers and ensure economic viability. Energy Secretary Chris Wright highlighted that this initiative could drive innovation,

    energynuclear-energyadvanced-reactorsfuel-cycleenergy-infrastructureenergy-policynuclear-fuel-management
  • Gutterres Says It's Time To Switch To Clean Energy Goals - CleanTechnica

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres emphasizes the urgent need to accelerate the global transition from fossil fuels to clean energy, highlighting renewables as the most cost-effective and sustainable power source available today. He advocates for tripling global renewable capacity by 2030 through removing barriers, reducing costs, and improving grid infrastructure to connect clean power to communities and industries. Guterres underscores the broad benefits of clean energy, including improved health, education, job creation, energy affordability, and resilience against geopolitical and market disruptions. However, he notes significant challenges remain, such as outdated grid systems and high costs that exclude many countries from the transition. To overcome these obstacles, Guterres calls for coordinated action across regulators, utilities, industry, and finance sectors. This includes adopting policies that incentivize clean power, modernizing and digitizing grids, diversifying supply chains for critical minerals, and lowering capital costs, especially in developing countries. Multilateral development banks are urged to reduce investment risks and mobilize private funding to

    clean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-transitionsolar-powerwind-energygrid-infrastructureenergy-policy
  • Groups Challenge Trump Administration's Illegal Craig Coal Plant Extension - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses a legal challenge by several public interest groups—including Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Earthjustice, GreenLatinos, Vote Solar, and Public Citizen—against the Trump administration’s Department of Energy (DOE) emergency order that extended the operation of Unit 1 at Colorado’s Craig Station coal plant. The unit was scheduled to retire on December 31, 2019, but the DOE’s December 30 order forced it to remain operational for 90 days, potentially longer, under regional grid authority direction. The groups argue that the order is illegal, unnecessary, and harmful, as it was not requested by the plant’s co-owners or state regulators, who support the retirement for economic and environmental reasons. They contend the order will increase utility bills, worsen air quality, and undermine years of careful state planning for a transition away from coal. The challengers emphasize that there is no actual energy emergency justifying the DOE’s action, which they describe as political interference favoring coal

    energycoal-powerDepartment-of-Energypower-plant-extensionenvironmental-impactenergy-policygrid-reliability
  • Europa baute Wasserstoffinfrastruktur statt des benötigten Stromnetzes* - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critiques Europe's approach to decarbonization, highlighting a critical policy failure: prioritizing hydrogen infrastructure over the necessary expansion of the electricity transmission grid. Despite early recognition in the late 2000s that electrification of transport, buildings, and industry would significantly increase electricity demand—by 40% to 70% by mid-century—Europe, particularly Germany, failed to expand its transmission capacity at the required pace. While renewable generation capacity, especially onshore wind, grew rapidly (from 27 GW in 2010 to over 60 GW in the early 2020s), the central north-south transmission corridors lagged by a decade or more. This mismatch caused substantial curtailment of renewable electricity—over 6 TWh in some years—wasting power that was already paid for and could have displaced fossil fuels or met electrification demand. This curtailment undermined investor confidence, increased system costs for consumers, and created a misleading impression of electricity

    energyhydrogen-infrastructureelectricity-gridrenewable-energypower-transmissiondecarbonizationenergy-policy
  • Trump energy department loosens rules on nuclear safety

    The Trump administration has significantly relaxed nuclear safety regulations within the Department of Energy (DOE), cutting about a third of the existing rulebook and revising key sections. These changes reduce mandatory protections related to groundwater and environmental contamination to mere suggestions and allow workers to be exposed to higher radiation levels. Additionally, security protocols for nuclear plants on DOE property have been largely delegated to the operating companies themselves. These new rules were implemented without public notice or comment and apply exclusively to reactors built on DOE land, while reactors elsewhere remain under the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s oversight. This regulatory shift comes amid a surge in funding for nuclear startups, driven in part by the growing electricity demands of data centers. Several companies are racing to develop demonstration reactors on DOE property to meet a Trump administration deadline of July 4, 2026. While the relaxed rules may accelerate reactor development, they raise concerns about potential risks to human health and the environment due to diminished safety and security standards.

    energynuclear-energyDepartment-of-Energynuclear-safetyreactor-developmentenvironmental-impactenergy-policy
  • 100 Gigawatts Of CdTe Thin Film Solar Possible By 2030

    The article discusses a recent study outlining a pathway for the United States to produce 100 gigawatts (DC) of cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin film solar panels annually by 2030. CdTe thin film solar technology differs from traditional silicon solar cells by using a solution-based process to deposit thin layers of cadmium telluride on glass sheets, offering advantages such as lower cost, higher production volume, and a smaller energy footprint. While CdTe solar panels currently make up a significant portion of the US utility-scale solar market, they represent only about 3% of global solar capacity due to their relatively lower conversion efficiency compared to silicon cells. The US Department of Energy, in partnership with industry leaders like First Solar, has been working for decades to improve CdTe technology and supply chains, culminating in a detailed roadmap published in the journal Joule. Two main challenges must be addressed to achieve the 100 GW annual production target: securing a reliable domestic supply of tellurium

    energysolar-energyCdTe-thin-filmrenewable-energyphotovoltaicsenergy-policyclean-technology
  • Hundreds of Thousands of People Across U.S. Voice Opposition to Trump’s Plan to Expand Offshore Drilling - CleanTechnica

    The article reports widespread opposition across the United States to the Trump administration’s proposal to significantly expand offshore oil and gas drilling along the coastlines of Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and California. Nearly 300,000 Americans submitted public comments opposing the plan during the 60-day comment period, which ended on January 23. Communities, local officials, businesses, tourism advocates, and environmental groups organized numerous public events such as town halls and hearings to voice concerns about the environmental, economic, and national security risks posed by the proposed 34 lease sales. Key critics, including the Sierra Club, emphasize the dangers of oil spills, toxic pollution, and long-term damage to fisheries and coastal economies, warning that the plan prioritizes corporate interests over public and ecological welfare. Activists staged high-profile demonstrations, including a banner display at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, to highlight the potential consequences of offshore drilling. Scientific visualizations from oceanographers demonstrate how quickly oil spills could spread via ocean currents and winds, threatening

    energyoffshore-drillingoil-and-gasenvironmental-impactpublic-oppositioncoastal-ecosystemsenergy-policy
  • Energy Affordability & Clean Air on the Line in Washington State - CleanTechnica

    The Washington State Supreme Court heard oral arguments on January 22, 2026, regarding the legality of Initiative 2066 (I-2066), which narrowly passed in the 2024 election with 51.7% of the vote. The initiative’s ballot title was challenged for being misleading, as it purportedly amended existing climate and clean air laws without clear voter awareness. Critics argue that I-2066 falsely claimed the state was banning natural gas access, despite state laws ensuring energy choice and requiring gas utilities to serve customers who want gas appliances. The initiative was supported by groups like the Building Industry of Washington and Let’s Go WA, with significant funding from out-of-state interests. Opponents, including Seattle City Attorney Erika Evans, environmental organizations such as Washington Conservation Action, the Sierra Club, and Front and Centered, contend that I-2066 undermines energy affordability, clean air protections, and the state’s clean energy transition commitments. They describe the initiative as a deceptive effort

    energyclean-energyclimate-changerenewable-energyenergy-policyair-qualityWashington-state
  • Advocates Challenge Georgia Power’s Overbuilt, Flawed Data Center Plan - CleanTechnica

    Environmental groups including the Sierra Club, the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, and the Southern Environmental Law Center have criticized Georgia Power’s plan to build what would be the most expensive gas plants in the U.S., specifically targeting the proposed Plant McIntosh project. They argue that Georgia Power has not provided sufficient justification for this large-scale gas infrastructure, relying instead on vague assurances that fossil fuel generation will be beneficial in the future. The groups contend that this plan will burden Georgia consumers with unnecessary costs and that the company’s load forecasts and strategies to protect customers from rising energy prices are questionable. Michael Hawthorne of the Sierra Club emphasized that the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) and Georgia Power appear to be aligned only in allowing the utility to proceed without adequate accountability or transparent data to support the plan. He called on the PSC to demand rigorous evidence and to reconsider the request for proposals (RFP) associated with the project. The Sierra Club, as America’s largest grassroots environmental organization, continues to advocate for clean

    energyclean-energyfossil-fuelgas-plantsenvironmental-activismenergy-policyenergy-costs
  • From Optimistic Models To Empty Pipelines: The Intellectual History Of Germany’s Hydrogen Backbone - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critically examines Germany’s hydrogen backbone project, emphasizing that its challenges stem not from technical issues alone but from a decade of overly optimistic intellectual assumptions embedded in studies and models. These analyses consistently underestimated the complexities and costs associated with producing, storing, distributing, and using hydrogen as a general energy carrier. Unlike hydrogen’s established industrial uses, extending it broadly into energy systems involved stacking optimistic assumptions—such as low electrolyzer costs, cheap electricity inputs, and minimal infrastructure expenses—that ignored significant energy losses and capital requirements at each stage. This led to distorted projections that portrayed large-scale hydrogen use as both feasible and necessary, despite the harsh realities of energy conversion inefficiencies and infrastructure demands. The article highlights how this optimistic consensus became entrenched within Germany’s energy policy ecosystem through a process described as gruppendenken, where research institutions, industry, and policymakers circulated similar premises without sufficient critical review. As a result, hydrogen’s role in the energy transition was treated as inevitable rather than a hypothesis to

    energyhydrogen-energyenergy-infrastructureenergy-policyhydrogen-pipelineenergy-modelingrenewable-energy
  • SEIA Elects New Board Chair, Board Members to Guide Organizational and Industrial Priorities in 2026 - CleanTechnica

    The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) has elected Scott Moskowitz of Qcells as its new board chair, succeeding Darren Van’t Hof, who stepped down after becoming interim president and CEO. Moskowitz’s leadership highlights SEIA’s focus on maintaining American-made solar and storage as dominant sources of new power. Ingmar Ritzenhofen, chief commercial officer at RWE Clean Energy, was elected vice chair, bringing expertise in large-scale solar project development and grid integration. SEIA’s leadership transition comes as the solar and storage industry faces a pivotal year in 2026 marked by policy uncertainty and regulatory changes. Alongside the chair and vice chair elections, SEIA appointed three at-large board members and a new affiliate representative, as well as division chairs and vice chairs across its six membership divisions, covering distributed generation, utility-scale, energy storage, manufacturing, residential, and solar services. These appointments aim to guide SEIA’s efforts to advance bipartisan policies that accelerate solar deployment, strengthen U.S.

    energysolar-energyenergy-storagerenewable-energyclean-energysolar-manufacturingenergy-policy
  • Environmental, Consumer Groups Challenge Trump’s Unlawful Coal Plant Extensions - CleanTechnica

    Seven environmental and consumer advocacy groups, including the Sierra Club, Environmental Law and Policy Center, and Earthjustice, are challenging the Trump Department of Energy’s recent decision to unlawfully extend the operation of two aging coal power plants in Indiana. The plants—the R.M. Schahfer power plant and a unit at the F.B. Culley generating station—were scheduled for retirement in December 2025 but were forced to remain online under Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act. This move is seen as an attempt to prop up the struggling coal industry at the expense of consumers, as operating these outdated plants is expected to be extremely costly, with Schahfer requiring over $1 billion in expenditures and Culley Unit 2 needing an additional $70 million. The groups argue that these extensions will drive up electricity costs for customers across Indiana and ten other states, exacerbating an already difficult affordability crisis marked by rising utility bills and grocery costs. They contend that the federal government has manufactured a false

    energycoal-power-plantsDepartment-of-Energyelectricity-pricesenvironmental-advocacyutility-billsenergy-policy
  • Japan: World’s largest nuclear plant to restart after nearly 15 years

    Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings (TEPCO) has initiated the partial restart of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata prefecture, marking its first reactor operation since the Fukushima Daiichi disaster nearly 15 years ago. Reactor No. 6, with a capacity of 1.35 gigawatts, began its nuclear reaction following test-use approval from Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority. TEPCO plans to gradually increase the reactor’s output to about 50% over the coming week, conduct safety checks, and aims to commence commercial operations by late February, pending regulatory clearance. The restart of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, once the world’s largest nuclear plant with a total capacity of 8.2 GW, represents a significant step in Japan’s cautious return to nuclear energy amid concerns over electricity supply shortages this summer. The move was supported by the Niigata prefectural assembly’s approval in December, and Reactor No. 7 is expected to

    energynuclear-powerTEPCOelectricity-generationrenewable-energyenergy-policypower-plant-restart
  • 777,000 patents studied to reveal bottleneck in hydrogen tech growth

    Researchers at Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, conducted an extensive analysis of 777,000 patents and 1.3 million citations over 182 years to identify key bottlenecks in hydrogen technology development. Their study revealed that while hydrogen production, storage, and fuel cell technologies have advanced steadily, the distribution infrastructure—comprising pipelines, terminals, and liquefaction plants—is progressing at only half that pace. This lag in distribution infrastructure development poses a critical bottleneck, threatening to undermine billions of dollars in clean energy investments and limiting the broader adoption and climate benefits of hydrogen technologies. The research highlights that distribution costs are becoming the dominant expense in hydrogen systems, driven by the need for massive capital investments in pipeline networks and liquefaction facilities, compounded by complex safety regulations and permitting processes. Additionally, the concentration of distribution infrastructure among a few major companies restricts knowledge sharing and innovation, further slowing sector growth. Experts emphasize that without robust distribution networks, hydrogen use will remain localized to production sites

    energyhydrogen-technologyclean-energyenergy-infrastructurehydrogen-distributionfuel-cellsenergy-policy
  • Trump Sends A Geothermal Energy Love Letter To Fossil Fuels

    The article discusses the Trump administration’s nuanced stance on energy policy, highlighting its support for geothermal energy alongside continued backing of fossil fuels. While President Trump reportedly sought support from fossil fuel executives, his administration also granted special status to domestic energy sources capable of providing reliable, 24/7 power, including fossil fuels, nuclear, biomass, hydropower, and geothermal energy. Notably, wind and solar were excluded from this preferential treatment. Geothermal energy, traditionally limited by geographic constraints in the Western US, is now expanding due to advances in underground mapping and drilling technologies, supported by initiatives from the US Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE’s Geothermal Technologies Office launched a 13-state collaboration called the Geothermal Power Accelerator to promote geothermal development through statewide goal-setting, resource mapping, and policy improvements aimed at reducing costs and regulatory hurdles. Nevada is already advancing projects under expedited federal permitting, with companies like Ormat developing multiple geothermal sites and integrating solar arrays. Additionally, Fervo Energy, an advanced

    energygeothermal-energyrenewable-energyUS-Department-of-Energyfossil-fuelsenergy-policyclean-energy
  • Trump administration’s legal setbacks are good news for offshore wind — and the grid

    The Trump administration faced significant legal setbacks after federal judges allowed construction to resume on three major offshore wind projects on the U.S. East Coast—Revolution Wind (Rhode Island), Empire Wind (New York), and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (Virginia). These projects had been halted by the Department of the Interior in December over national security concerns, specifically the potential interference of wind turbines with radar operations. However, courts found the administration’s reasoning insufficient and arbitrary, with judges questioning the government's failure to adequately address developer arguments and the rationale behind stopping construction when the main concern was operational interference. While two other projects, Sunrise Wind and Vineyard Wind 1, remain in legal limbo, the resumption of these three projects is a positive development for offshore wind energy. The East Coast has the potential to generate up to 110 gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2050, which could significantly benefit densely populated regions with high electricity costs and strained grids. Offshore wind is seen as a key renewable energy source

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-farmsgrid-infrastructureenergy-policylegal-challenges
  • 8 Democratic Governors Urge Big Tech To Pay Their Fair Share - CleanTechnica

    Eight Democratic governors from Pennsylvania, Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Kentucky, North Carolina, and Maryland have jointly urged Big Tech companies to pay their fair share for the significant electricity demand their data centers place on the regional power grid managed by PJM, the nation’s largest grid operator. This call to action coincides with PJM’s upcoming policy update submission to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, addressing the challenges of large load additions from data centers. The governors support extending a price cap on electricity capacity auctions, initially implemented to protect consumers from soaring costs, while discussions continue on other measures such as expedited interconnection for data center generation. Environmental advocates like the Sierra Club commend the governors’ leadership and ongoing negotiations, emphasizing the need for policies that ensure fairness and reliability for the 67 million people served by PJM. They stress the importance of expanding low-cost, clean energy sources—including wind, solar, battery storage, and geothermal—to mitigate rising electricity costs. The Sierra Club also highlights the potential for

    energyelectricity-griddata-centersrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-affordabilityPJM-grid-operator
  • Students & Community Groups Cry Foul As University of Oregon Increases Fossil Fuel Use By Over Fifty Percent - CleanTechnica

    Students and community groups in Eugene, Oregon, have strongly criticized the University of Oregon for initiating a pilot project on January 6th that significantly increases the campus's fossil fuel use. The project involves installing a large methane gas turbine to generate electricity for sale to the local utility, Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB). This move, which was implemented without public announcement or opportunity for community input, contradicts longstanding calls from students and environmental advocates to decarbonize the university’s heating system—the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the city. The new turbine is projected to increase fossil fuel consumption by about 65%, equating to burning over 4 million pounds of coal in an average January, thereby undermining the city’s Climate Recovery Ordinance and the university’s own climate commitments. Critics, including the Sierra Club and the University of Oregon Climate Justice League, condemn the administration for ignoring multiple student resolutions opposing the expansion of natural gas infrastructure. They argue that the pilot project exacerbates the university

    energyfossil-fuelsnatural-gas-turbineuniversity-sustainabilitygreenhouse-gas-emissionsclimate-actionenergy-policy
  • Ireland Tells Data Center Developers To Bring Their Own Clean Energy - CleanTechnica

    Ireland, a major European hub for data centers, faces significant energy supply challenges due to the high electricity demand of these facilities, which consume about a quarter of the country's power—more than all urban households combined. Most new data centers prefer locations near Dublin for workforce and connectivity reasons, but since 2021, the local grid operator has warned that the existing infrastructure cannot support additional demand without risking widespread blackouts. Consequently, no new data centers have been built in the Dublin area for four years. To address this, Ireland’s Commission for Regulation of Utilities introduced a policy requiring new data centers to generate or store enough clean energy on-site to meet their full electricity needs and to supply excess power back to the grid. Additionally, at least 80% of their electricity must come from new renewable sources, while utilities must report regularly on grid capacity, renewable energy use, and carbon emissions. In response to these challenges, the Irish government announced the Large Energy-User Action Plan (LEAP) on January

    energyrenewable-energydata-centersclean-energyIrelandenergy-policygrid-management
  • Comments on World's Potential Response to Trump on UNFCCC Withdrawal - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses global reactions and potential consequences following the United States' withdrawal from the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) under the Trump administration. It highlights a range of insightful comments emphasizing that while the US retreat from international climate commitments is detrimental, it may not significantly hinder global progress on clean energy. Many other regions—including Europe, Asia, and Africa—are expected to accelerate their adoption of zero-emission technologies, such as widespread electrification beyond just electric vehicles, thereby driving down emissions and technology costs independently of US policy. A key point raised is that China stands to benefit substantially from the US withdrawal. The article notes that China has already capitalized on the US's inconsistent climate stance by heavily investing in renewable energy research, development, and deployment, effectively cornering the market on clean technology. The US’s imposition of tariffs and restrictions on solar panels, batteries, and related technologies has slowed its own transition while allowing China and other countries to advance rapidly.

    energyrenewable-energyclean-technologyelectrificationsolar-panelswind-turbinesenergy-policy
  • The Long US Goodbye to New Gas Connections and the Legal Tools States Are Using to Get There - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses the evolving legal and policy landscape surrounding bans on new natural gas hookups in buildings across the United States. Initially treated as local issues related to building codes and environmental planning, these bans have become a national legal battleground, especially after the Trump Administration reframed them as federal preemption disputes. The core objective of these bans is to prevent new long-term fossil fuel infrastructure commitments in new construction, where gas service lines and appliances installed today are expected to last several decades. Importantly, these policies do not affect existing gas customers or mandate retrofits but focus on limiting future expansions of gas infrastructure. A key economic challenge highlighted is the "gas utility death spiral," a feedback loop where fixed infrastructure costs remain constant despite a shrinking customer base due to electrification and gas disconnections. Utilities recover most of their costs through fixed charges tied to infrastructure, not gas volume. As more customers switch to electric alternatives, the fixed costs are spread among fewer users, driving up rates and incentivizing

    energynatural-gaselectrificationutility-infrastructuregas-bansfossil-fuel-declineenergy-policy
  • Trump Is Losing The Renewable Energy War, Part Infinity

    The article "Trump Is Losing The Renewable Energy War, Part Infinity" highlights the ongoing struggle between the Trump administration's fossil-fuel-friendly policies and the growing momentum of renewable energy initiatives at the state level in the United States. While President Trump has attempted to hinder renewable energy development—most notably by targeting the offshore wind industry through federal lease cancellations and regulatory reviews—these efforts have faced legal challenges and resistance. A federal judge ruled against the Interior Department's disruptive review of existing leases, and the industry continues to contest stop-work orders, indicating that Trump's attempts to stall renewables are not fully succeeding. Meanwhile, state governments are actively advancing renewable energy policies that counteract federal obstruction. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) reports significant progress in states like California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Texas, and Virginia. California has passed legislation to foster electricity partnerships and expedite clean energy projects, while Colorado is accelerating grid connections and launching virtual power plant programs. Illinois recently enacted the Clean and Reliable

    renewable-energyclean-energysolar-energyenergy-storagevirtual-power-plantenergy-policygrid-modernization
  • Trump Wants Venezuela's Oil. Getting It Might Not Be So Simple

    The Trump administration has expressed a strong interest in accessing Venezuela’s vast oil reserves, linking the capture of Nicolás Maduro to control over the country’s oil wealth. President Trump envisions major U.S. oil companies investing billions to repair Venezuela’s deteriorated oil infrastructure and significantly boost production. However, experts highlight significant challenges, including Venezuela’s declining oil output since the 1990s, the impact of U.S. sanctions, and the current oversupplied global oil market, which complicate the feasibility and attractiveness of such a venture for American companies. Venezuela, despite holding some of the world’s largest oil reserves, has seen production fall from over 3 million barrels per day in the late 1990s to about 1.3 million barrels per day in 2018, exacerbated by nationalization and sanctions. Trump’s approach, influenced by his “drill, baby, drill” philosophy and a simplistic view of energy geopolitics, assumes that controlling Venezuela’s leadership equates

    energyoil-industryVenezuela-oil-reservesUS-oil-productionoil-geopoliticsfossil-fuelsenergy-policy
  • Donald Trump Illegally Extends Life of the Coal-Fired Craig Unit 1, Driving Up Electricity Bills and Increasing Pollution - CleanTechnica

    The article reports that the Trump administration has controversially used an emergency order under Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act—historically reserved for extreme weather or wartime situations—to extend the operation of aging and costly coal-fired power plants, including Craig Unit 1 in Colorado. This move forces these plants to remain online past their planned retirement dates, resulting in increased electricity bills and higher pollution levels. Similar extensions have been applied to other plants such as the J.H. Campbell plant in Michigan and the Eddystone power plant, with the Campbell extension reportedly costing hundreds of millions of dollars. Environmental groups, notably the Sierra Club, strongly oppose these orders, arguing that they prioritize coal industry profits over public interest and clean energy goals. Sierra Club leaders emphasize that the extensions unfairly burden consumers, especially those already facing financial hardships, by raising utility costs and perpetuating reliance on dirty, expensive coal power. They have taken legal action, including appeals to the D.C. Court of Appeals, challenging the

    energycoal-powerelectricity-billsenergy-policypower-plantsenvironmental-impactclean-energy-advocacy
  • The Case Against Offshore Wind Is Already Crumbling

    The article discusses the Trump administration’s repeated attempts to halt offshore wind projects along the U.S. Atlantic Coast by citing national security concerns, efforts that have largely failed both legally and practically. Beginning with a December 22 stop-work order on five major offshore wind farms—including Vineyard Wind, Revolution Wind, Sunrise Wind, Empire Wind, and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind—the administration claimed a dire national security emergency. However, this claim quickly unraveled as the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management allowed Vineyard Wind to continue partial operations, and state governors (except Virginia’s Glenn Youngkin) challenged the legitimacy of the emergency declaration. Previous stop-work orders earlier in the year similarly faltered, with courts ruling against the administration’s broad halts on projects already permitted or underway. Legal setbacks have significantly undermined the administration’s efforts. Federal judges ruled that stopping work on leases already permitted was arbitrary and illegal, and the administration failed to appeal these decisions effectively. Dominion Energy’s lawsuit to resume work on the Virginia project is pending, with

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-farmsclean-energyenergy-policysustainable-energy
  • Solar Company Spread Across 9 States Shuts Down Shop, Blames Trump's OBBBA - CleanTechnica

    Purelight Power, a solar installation company operating across nine U.S. states, announced its closure and impending Chapter 7 bankruptcy, citing the negative impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) signed by former President Donald Trump. The company attributed its financial struggles primarily to the elimination of consumer tax credits for rooftop solar installations, which had been initially supported by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 but lasted less than three years. This abrupt policy change led to a significant drop in business, reduced revenue, and difficulties in financing projects, compounded by other challenges such as a prior merger, rising interest rates, and increased advertising costs. Despite efforts to restructure, reduce costs, and seek refinancing or a buyer, Purelight Power was unable to secure acceptable offers, resulting in the loss of 109 jobs, including 84 in Oregon. The shutdown reflects broader consequences of the Trump administration's rollback of clean energy incentives, which critics argue favors fossil fuel interests at the expense of renewable energy growth,

    energysolar-energyrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-policybankruptcy
  • So Much Winning For Renewable Energy In The US

    The article discusses the ongoing dominance of renewable energy in the U.S. despite significant opposition from President Donald Trump during his term starting in 2025. Trump aggressively rolled back federal support for clean energy, leading to thousands of lost jobs, canceled projects totaling over $24 billion in 2025 alone, and increased electricity costs. His most notable attack targeted the domestic offshore wind industry by halting new federal offshore leases and issuing emergency orders to stop construction, resulting in legal battles and costly delays. These actions negatively impacted workers and investments across both Republican and Democratic districts. Despite these setbacks, renewable energy—especially solar—continued to lead new electricity capacity additions. Data from the SUN DAY Campaign and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission show that solar power has been the largest source of new generating capacity for 25 consecutive months, with utility-scale solar capacity growing from 91.82 GW to 158.43 GW between September 2023 and September 2025. This growth underscores that, regardless of political opposition and

    renewable-energyclean-energywind-powersolar-powerenergy-policyoffshore-windenergy-jobs
  • The Great Big Power Play

    The article "The Great Big Power Play" outlines the evolving landscape of US energy policy, particularly focusing on coal and nuclear power amid rising energy demands driven by artificial intelligence (AI). In 2017, the administration attempted to support struggling coal and nuclear plants through subsidies, but these efforts largely failed as coal's share of the US power mix declined from 45% in 2010 to 17% today, and several nuclear plants shut down or stalled in construction. However, in 2025, there has been a renewed push to revitalize nuclear energy, with the Trump administration issuing executive orders to build new reactors and streamline regulatory processes. This push is closely tied to AI's growing energy needs, with major tech companies like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft investing in nuclear power to run data centers, including efforts to restart retired reactors such as Three Mile Island. Despite this momentum and rising public support for nuclear power, significant challenges remain. The high costs of nuclear construction, skepticism about valuations of small

    energynuclear-powerrenewable-energyAI-energy-needspower-plantsenergy-policyenergy-subsidies
  • How Mayor Mamdani Could Advance Solar in NYC - CleanTechnica

    The New York Solar Energy Industries Association (NYSEIA) has released a detailed “playbook” outlining ten key policy recommendations for Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani to advance solar power and energy storage in New York City. The proposals aim to lower electricity bills, improve air quality, and enhance the city’s resilience by setting ambitious goals such as raising NYC’s solar capacity target to 2 gigawatts by 2035 and energy storage to 2 gigawatts by 2030. The playbook also emphasizes aligning local fire codes with state regulations to enable safe residential battery installations and supporting legislation to make solar and storage tax abatements refundable for nonprofits and affordable housing. Additional recommendations include allowing covered buildings to purchase credits from local behind-the-meter solar systems for compliance with Local Law 97, clarifying the use of solar and storage for emissions reduction beyond 2029, and expediting electrical inspections through self-certification or expanded special inspections. NYSEIA also calls for greater transparency from Con Edison

    energysolar-energyenergy-storageclean-energybattery-storagerenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Four States Demand Answers On Offshore Wind Work Stoppage

    Last week, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum abruptly halted work on five offshore wind farms along the Atlantic coast, citing new, classified information from the Department of Defense (DoD) as the reason. This unexpected stop-work order has prompted the governors of the affected states—Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New York—to demand a classified briefing from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to understand the nature of the supposed threat. These four Democratic governors jointly signed a letter on December 24 seeking transparency to protect their residents and clarify the emergency that led to the unprecedented halt of significant energy infrastructure projects, all of which had previously been approved by federal agencies. Notably absent from this collective response is Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, a Republican and a known supporter of the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project, which is the largest and closest to completion among the five halted projects. Despite his prior advocacy for CVOW, Youngkin has remained silent and refrained from joining the other governors in demanding

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-farmsclean-energyenergy-policygovernment-regulation
  • “Short-sighted” Pause on Offshore Wind Projects Could Kill Jobs & Increase Electric Bills - CleanTechnica

    The Trump Administration has announced a pause on all offshore wind projects currently under construction, including five fully permitted projects nearing completion. These projects represent nearly 6 gigawatts of energy capacity, enough to power over 2.5 million homes. This decision follows a court ruling and is viewed as part of the administration’s broader opposition to clean energy initiatives, despite claims of an energy emergency. Environmental advocates, such as the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), strongly criticize the pause, calling it “short-sighted” and harmful to the clean energy sector. They highlight that these projects have been in development for over a decade with full federal approval and cooperation with the Department of Defense. The halt threatens tens of thousands of jobs and undermines investments in clean energy infrastructure, potentially leading to higher electricity bills and stalling progress toward climate goals. NRDC warns that the administration’s actions favor fossil fuels at the expense of the economy’s transition to cleaner, more affordable energy sources.

    energyoffshore-windclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policywind-powerenergy-infrastructure
  • Trump Pause on All Offshore Wind Projects an Attack on Our Economy & Public Health - CleanTechnica

    The Trump administration’s Department of the Interior has ordered a halt to construction on all five offshore wind projects currently underway in the United States, including Vineyard Wind 1, Revolution Wind, Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, Sunrise Wind, and Empire Wind 1. This pause directly affects the development of renewable energy infrastructure critical to providing clean, affordable electricity and creating green jobs. The decision has been strongly criticized by environmental advocates, with Sierra Club Legislative Director Melinda Pierce calling it “an attack on our economy and our public health,” accusing the administration of undermining progress in the renewable energy sector. The Sierra Club, America’s largest grassroots environmental organization, emphasizes that offshore wind projects are essential for advancing clean energy, protecting public health, and supporting economic growth through job creation. The organization advocates for continued development of renewable energy to ensure affordable, reliable power that does not compromise environmental or human health. The Interior Department’s move is seen as a significant setback for the U.S. clean energy transition and efforts to combat climate change

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyclean-energywind-powerenergy-policysustainable-energy
  • As Offshore Wind War Heats Up, Trump's Flop Sweat Is Showing

    The article discusses President Donald Trump's recent decision on December 22 to halt construction at the 2.6-gigawatt Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project, marking a significant escalation in his longstanding opposition to the U.S. offshore wind industry. Despite Trump's vocal threats since January, the CVOW project had previously been exempt from federal interference, possibly due to intervention by Virginia's Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, who supported the project despite his alignment with Trump. This protection ended following the November 2025 Virginia gubernatorial election, where a Democrat won, aligning Virginia with other Democratic-led states that host offshore wind projects. Trump's new order also affects four other major offshore wind projects in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New York, citing national security concerns as justification. However, this rationale is questioned because these projects had already passed extensive multi-agency national security reviews prior to approval. The timing and nature of the order suggest political motivations tied to partisan conflicts rather than new security threats.

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-turbinesclean-energyenergy-policyUS-energy-projects
  • Trump admin halts 6 GW of offshore wind leases again

    The Trump administration has again paused offshore wind leases for five major projects totaling nearly 6 gigawatts of generating capacity along the U.S. East Coast, citing national security concerns related to radar interference. Interior Secretary Doug Bergum referenced emerging risks from adversary technologies and vulnerabilities posed by large-scale offshore wind farms near population centers. The affected projects include Revolution Wind (Connecticut and Rhode Island), Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, Vineyard Wind (Massachusetts), and Empire Wind and Sunrise Wind (New York). The Department of the Interior based its decision on unclassified and classified Pentagon reports but did not specify the agencies involved or provide links to these documents. Radar interference from wind turbines is a known issue that has been studied for over a decade, with various mitigation strategies developed and implemented. Wind turbine blades create complex Doppler signatures that can challenge radar detection, but adaptive processing algorithms and careful wind farm siting have allowed radar systems to filter out these interferences effectively. A 2024 Energy Department report noted that while

    energyoffshore-windwind-turbinesrenewable-energyradar-interferenceenergy-policynational-security
  • Georgia Public Service Commission Issues Final Order on Data Center Power Plan - CleanTechnica

    The Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) has unanimously approved Georgia Power’s plan to construct what are projected to be the most expensive gas-fired power plants in the United States. The plan involves at least $15 billion in upfront capital costs, with total expenses potentially exceeding $60 billion over the lifespan of the assets. Although Georgia Power promised that the plan would exert “downward pressure” on energy rates, critics argue that it will instead lead to significantly higher electricity bills for Georgian consumers for many years. The power generated is intended to support data centers that may not even be built, raising concerns about the prudence and necessity of the investment. Environmental advocates, including the Sierra Club, have strongly criticized the PSC’s decision. Michael Hawthorne of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign condemned the plan as serving Georgia Power’s financial interests rather than the public’s, highlighting that the utility benefits financially from building costly fossil fuel infrastructure. The Sierra Club argues that gas plants are not a sound investment for ratepayers and

    energypower-plantsdata-centersGeorgia-Powerfossil-fuelsenergy-policyclean-energy-debate
  • New Jersey Sides With Solar! More State Leadership Needed - CleanTechnica

    The article highlights New Jersey’s recent legislative progress in supporting residential solar energy. The New Jersey Senate passed bill A-5264, which streamlines and modernizes the permitting process for residential solar systems, making it more efficient and affordable. This law aims to reduce costly delays and red tape that previously added up to $7,000 to the cost of an average solar installation, while maintaining safety and reliability standards. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) praised the legislation as beneficial for energy affordability, reliability, and local economies across the state. The article emphasizes the importance of state and local leadership in advancing solar power, especially amid federal challenges such as the SPEED Act and opposition from the Trump administration. New Jersey voters clearly expressed their desire for affordable energy and support for solar and storage solutions in recent elections, prompting lawmakers to act. New Jersey has long been a leader in residential solar policy, ranking sixth in the U.S. with over 209,000 homes equipped with solar systems. The article calls

    energysolar-energyrenewable-energysolar-powerenergy-policyresidential-solarenergy-storage
  • House Passes SPEED Act, Failing to Lower Energy Costs or Speed Clean Energy Deployment - CleanTechnica

    The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act (SPEED Act), which has drawn criticism from environmental groups for failing to effectively lower energy costs or accelerate clean energy deployment. Instead of addressing the true obstacles hindering renewable energy projects, the SPEED Act weakens the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), potentially enabling polluting fossil fuel projects to proceed with less accountability. Over 150 environmental and community organizations have urged Congress to focus on building clean energy infrastructure at scale through proper planning and public engagement, warning that shortcuts lead to delays, conflicts, and increased costs. The Sierra Club, a leading environmental organization, condemned the SPEED Act for prioritizing fossil fuel infrastructure while neglecting barriers faced by wind, solar, and transmission projects. Mahyar Sorour, Sierra Club Beyond Fossil Fuels Policy Director, emphasized that the legislation would lock in pollution and risk costly delays and lawsuits, rather than speeding up the deployment of clean, affordable energy. He called

    energyclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policytransmission-linesfossil-fuelsenergy-infrastructure
  • Sierra Club: Rising Prices Directly Linked to Trump Tariffs, Cuts to Clean Energy - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the Sierra Club’s critique of the Trump administration’s trade and energy policies, linking them directly to rising prices and increased inflation. Recent Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed a 2.7% inflation increase from September to November, with energy prices rising 4.2% over the year. The Sierra Club argues that Trump-era tariffs and trade barriers, combined with cuts to clean energy investments, have harmed American manufacturing competitiveness, driven up costs, and worsened energy affordability. Specifically, reductions in clean energy development and increased methane gas exports have contributed to skyrocketing energy prices, with fuel oil prices up 11.2% as winter approaches. Harry Manin, Sierra Club’s Industrial Transformation Campaign Lead, criticized the administration’s approach as “manic,” asserting that it raises prices and pollution while making it harder for families to afford heating. He advocates for tariffs that encourage environmental standards alongside investments in clean energy sources like solar and wind, which could improve grid reliability, create

    energyclean-energytariffsinflationrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-prices
  • Solar & Wind Attacks Continue With SPEED ACT - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights ongoing political opposition to solar and wind energy in the United States, particularly under the Trump administration and supported by the Republican Party. Despite broad bipartisan voter support for renewable energy, the recently passed Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act in the House of Representatives continues efforts to undermine solar and wind projects. The Act grants the administration authority to cancel previously approved renewable projects while expediting fossil fuel project approvals. It also significantly limits environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), reducing public input, restricting consideration of climate and environmental justice impacts, and making it harder for communities to legally challenge flawed environmental assessments. Critics, including Democratic lawmakers and industry representatives like Abigail Ross Hopper of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), argue that the SPEED Act exacerbates an already hostile regulatory environment for clean energy. They contend the legislation fails to restore canceled renewable projects or address other barriers, effectively giving the Trump administration expansive powers to prioritize fossil fuels over

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-powerenergy-policyclean-energyenvironmental-regulation
  • If It Isn't Discussed By Conservative Groups, Does "Climate Change" Still Exist? - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the persistent denial and downplaying of climate change by conservative groups, particularly under the Trump administration. It notes that conservative coalitions have celebrated regulatory and fiscal victories that favor fossil fuel production, claiming to restore "America’s path toward true energy dominance." This stance contrasts sharply with scientific consensus, as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes nearly all recent warming to human carbon emissions. Despite visible climate impacts, such as unusual flooding linked to warming, conservative groups continue to dismiss or ignore these threats, often fueled by well-funded disinformation campaigns that undermine climate action globally. The piece also discusses how major companies, including tech giants like Meta, are scaling back climate initiatives, reflecting a broader retreat from aggressive climate policies. Climate misinformation is widespread, propagated by social and legacy media, with conservative voices often framing climate advocates as weak or emotional while adopting a masculine, authoritarian tone to reject global warming. This cultural and political resistance persists despite decades of scientific evidence and

    energyclimate-changefossil-fuelscarbon-emissionslow-carbon-investmentclimate-misinformationenergy-policy
  • Electricity Scarcity Meets Aluminum Tariffs, and American Citizens Pick Up the Bill - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the growing conflict between the rising electricity demands of AI data centers and the traditional aluminum smelting industry in the United States. Utilities facing limited generation and transmission capacity prioritize customers who can pay more and accept shorter contracts—typically AI data centers—over aluminum smelters, which require long-term, low-cost electricity contracts to remain viable. Aluminum smelting is highly electricity-intensive, operating continuously with power costs as the primary input, whereas AI data centers have more flexibility to pay higher prices and shift loads geographically. This structural imbalance has contributed to the long-term decline of U.S. primary aluminum production, which has been ongoing for decades due to globalization, aging plants, rising power costs, and environmental regulations. By the early 2020s, only four primary aluminum smelters remained in the U.S., supplying a fraction of national demand, with recycling and imports filling the gap. In 2025, the U.S. government sharply increased tariffs on imported aluminum—up

    energyaluminum-smeltingelectricity-scarcitytariffspower-contractsdata-centersenergy-policy
  • Comments on Federal Judge Vacating Trump’s Unlawful Wind Energy Ban - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses a recent federal court ruling that vacated former President Donald Trump’s executive order banning wind energy projects in the United States. Trump’s opposition to wind farms dates back to a 2006 lawsuit against a Scottish offshore wind project near his golf course, which he lost. As president, he aggressively blocked wind and solar energy initiatives through regulations favoring fossil fuels, hindering the growth of the renewable energy sector and costing the U.S. tens of thousands of jobs, particularly in offshore wind development. The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts found Trump’s wind energy ban unlawful, citing its arbitrary nature, lack of scientific basis, unclear purpose, and threat to U.S. climate goals and public health. Environmental groups and clean energy advocates hailed the decision as a significant victory for affordable, reliable, and clean energy. They emphasized that lifting the ban will help restore job growth in the wind sector, reduce electricity costs, and advance climate and health objectives. The ruling also clears the way

    energyrenewable-energywind-powerclean-energyoffshore-windenergy-policyenvironmental-law
  • ICYMI: Indianapolis Billboard Calls Out Coal for Hoosiers’ High Utility Bills - CleanTechnica

    A new billboard in downtown Indianapolis highlights the connection between Hoosiers’ rising utility bills and the continued reliance on coal-fired power. Indiana has experienced the highest year-over-year increase in electric bills nationally, with prices rising over 16% in the past year. Despite coal becoming the least economical energy source compared to increasingly affordable clean energy options, utilities such as Duke Indiana and CenterPoint Energy have delayed retiring coal plants and scaled back clean energy initiatives, resulting in higher costs for consumers. The Sierra Club, which organized the billboard campaign, criticizes state leaders for not addressing the issue effectively, pointing out that promises from political figures like President Trump and Governor Braun to tackle soaring energy costs have gone unfulfilled. Nicole Chandler, a Sierra Club campaign organizer, emphasized that affordability is a major concern for Indiana residents and that transitioning to clean energy would help lower utility bills. The Sierra Club advocates for policies supporting clean, affordable energy solutions rather than maintaining dependence on monopoly utilities and coal power.

    energycoal-energyclean-energyutility-billsIndiana-energySierra-Clubenergy-policy
  • 143 Solar Companies Urge Congress to Work with DOI to Unleash American Solar Energy; Ensure Certainty, Equal Treatment of All Energy Sources in Permitting Reform - CleanTechnica

    A coalition of 143 solar energy companies has sent a letter to the U.S. Congress urging lawmakers to collaborate with the Department of the Interior (DOI) to address a July 15 DOI memo that has effectively imposed a near-complete moratorium on permitting solar projects. The companies argue that the memo and its implementation have created excessive regulatory barriers, delaying or halting solar project approvals on both federal and private lands. They emphasize the need for permitting reforms that ensure fairness and certainty, without discrimination against solar energy compared to other energy sources. The letter highlights that the DOI memo has impacted multiple permitting processes, including those under DOI agencies for projects on federal lands, consultations involving DOI on private lands, and permits from other federal agencies where DOI has a consultative role. Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), stressed that without addressing this unequal treatment, the solar industry faces significant deployment and investment challenges amid rising energy demand. SEIA also criticized the SPEED Act for

    solar-energyenergy-policypermitting-reformrenewable-energyDepartment-of-Interiorsolar-industryenergy-investment
  • We Are The Simpsons, Or Worse - CleanTechnica

    The article criticizes the recent decision by the Trump administration to rename the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to the National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR), viewing it as a regressive and illogical move. The author highlights that renewable energy, particularly solar power, now dominates new power capacity in the U.S., accounting for 92.5% of new additions, with solar comprising 77.3%. Given that renewable energy is the cheapest, fastest to build, and healthier option compared to fossil fuels, the renaming is seen as a symbolic rejection of progress in clean energy. The article also notes the irony that NREL was established and expanded under Republican presidents, emphasizing a time when bipartisan support existed for energy innovation. The author expresses frustration not only with the renaming itself but also with the poorly executed implementation, such as the lack of a new logo and inconsistent use of the new name across the laboratory’s website. This sloppy rebranding is used as a metaphor for broader governmental incompet

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerNational-Renewable-Energy-Laboratoryclean-energyenergy-policysustainable-energy
  • Solar Power Benefits Public Schools...What's Wrong With That?

    The article highlights the growing role of solar power as a vital economic and educational resource for public K-12 schools in the United States, particularly amid political and funding challenges. While conservative policies, such as President Trump’s “American Energy Dominance,” often emphasize fossil fuels, solar energy has emerged as a bipartisan benefit for public education. Solar projects help school districts by generating tax revenue and reducing electricity costs, which is crucial as many districts face stagnant or declining state and federal funding. Additionally, solar installations provide educational opportunities and workforce training platforms, supporting schools beyond just financial relief. A notable example is the Stoneridge Solar power plant in Milam County, Texas, which includes a large battery storage system and is expected to generate millions in tax revenue for local schools and first responders. Despite recent increases in Texas school funding, much of the new money has focused on teacher pay rather than operational costs, and a new voucher program favors non-public schools. In urban settings, rooftop solar arrays on public schools, such

    energysolar-powerpublic-schoolsrenewable-energybattery-storageenergy-policyeducation-funding
  • Hydropower, Energy Dominance, And Tribal Rights - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the tension between the U.S. government's push for expanded hydropower development and the rights of Native American tribes to veto projects on their lands. In 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) established a rule allowing tribes to reject hydropower projects proposed on their territories, following the rejection of several preliminary permits within Navajo Nation land. This policy aims to respect tribal sovereignty and prevent unwanted projects. However, some industry advocates, like Chris Wright, argue that this veto power hinders the rapid growth of energy infrastructure needed for America to maintain global energy dominance, particularly to support the expansion of data centers powered by non-wind and non-solar sources. Native American tribes and their allies strongly oppose efforts to remove tribal veto authority, viewing such moves as infringements on their rights and sovereignty. Leaders like Amy Trainer of the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community emphasize that eliminating veto power would invite speculative project filings and undermine trust between the government and tribes. Organizations like the Tall

    energyhydropowertribal-rightsrenewable-energyindigenous-sovereigntyenergy-policyenergy-infrastructure
  • Donald Trump’s $100 Million Power Plant Boondoggle is Extended for 3rd Time - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica reports that the Trump administration has extended the operation of an expensive coal-fired power plant in Eddystone, Pennsylvania, for the third time, despite widespread criticism. According to the Sierra Club, these extensions have cost utility customers over $156 million to date, with Consumers Energy confirming more than $115 million in costs since the initial order in May 2025. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation recently issued its 2025–2026 report, which appears to be related to this ongoing situation. The Sierra Club strongly condemns the decision, arguing that keeping these aging, costly coal plants online is unnecessary and exacerbates the current affordability crisis for consumers. Patrick Drupp, the Sierra Club Climate Policy Director, criticized the move as an illegal and fabricated emergency order that forces families in the Midwest and Midatlantic to pay higher utility bills to benefit coal companies. The Sierra Club vows to continue challenging these orders to protect consumers and promote cleaner energy alternatives. The article also provides background

    energypower-plantcoal-energyenergy-policyutility-billsclean-energyenvironmental-activism
  • US House Bill Would Allow Rubber Stamping of Dangerous LNG Gas Exports - CleanTechnica

    The US House of Representatives recently passed a bill that would significantly limit federal review of the impacts associated with expanded liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. This legislation restricts consideration of how increased LNG exports affect the economy, consumer energy costs, climate change, and local communities. Over 150 climate and environmental justice organizations have opposed the bill, arguing that LNG exports worsen climate change, perpetuate environmental injustices, and raise energy prices for households and businesses. These groups emphasize the necessity of thorough Department of Energy (DOE) assessments before approving future LNG export authorizations. In response, the Sierra Club criticized the bill, highlighting that the rapid growth of LNG exports has primarily benefited fossil fuel companies while imposing costs on consumers and communities. Sierra Club’s Director of Beyond Fossil Fuels Policy, Mahyar Sorour, called for greater oversight rather than less, urging the Senate to reject the bill and instead focus on investments in clean energy and reducing energy costs. The Sierra Club, as a leading environmental

    energyLNG-exportsfossil-fuelsclean-energyclimate-changeenvironmental-justiceenergy-policy
  • US Green Hydrogen Startups Are Moving On To Greener Pastures

    The US green hydrogen industry has faced significant setbacks following a sharp reversal in federal energy policy, particularly under the Trump administration, which rescinded billions in funding for initiatives like the $7 billion Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program launched during the Biden administration. This program, funded by the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and managed by the Department of Energy, aimed to reduce green hydrogen costs and diversify the hydrogen supply chain across various regions. Despite some progress, including the selection of seven hubs in 2023 and support for decarbonizing transportation fleets, federal backing for domestic green hydrogen efforts has largely been curtailed. In response to the diminished US support, startups such as Iowa-based SunHydrogen are pivoting toward international opportunities. SunHydrogen is developing innovative green hydrogen production methods based on photoelectrochemistry, which seeks to mimic natural processes to reduce costs compared to traditional electrolysis. The company is actively involved in a pilot project at the University of Texas at Austin’s Hydrogen ProtoHub,

    energygreen-hydrogenrenewable-energyelectrolysisclean-energyhydrogen-productionenergy-policy
  • Making Solar “Policy-Proof” - Building A Smarter, More Sustainable Energy Future - CleanTechnica

    The article "Making Solar ‘Policy-Proof’ - Building A Smarter, More Sustainable Energy Future" by Chris Hopper, co-founder of Aurora Solar, discusses the solar industry's transition as the federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC)—which provided a 30% tax credit for solar installations—begins to phase down after 2025. While the ITC significantly accelerated solar adoption in the U.S., many consumers still lack a clear understanding of its value. With incentives diminishing, the industry must now focus on innovation, efficiency, and reducing costs to sustain growth. This includes making solar easier to understand, faster to deploy, and less expensive to install, effectively making solar "policy-proof." Key challenges include high soft costs—such as permitting, customer acquisition, and overhead—that constitute nearly two-thirds of solar project expenses. The article highlights the potential of digital tools and automation to streamline design and installation processes, lowering costs and improving customer trust. Trust is crucial, as 41% of homeowners find it

    energysolar-energyclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-efficiencysolar-technology
  • Trump Energy department drops renewables, promotes fusion in office reshuffle

    The Trump administration has implemented a significant reshuffle within the Department of Energy (DOE), notably eliminating several offices focused on renewable energy and energy efficiency. These include the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED), the Office of Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains, the Office of State and Community Energy Programs, the Grid Deployment Office, and the Office of Federal Energy Management programs. In contrast, the DOE has established a new Office of Fusion to promote the commercialization of fusion energy technology, which was previously managed under the Office of Science with a research focus. Additionally, geothermal energy has been merged with fossil fuels under a newly created Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office. These organizational changes have raised concerns about their legality, as some of the affected offices, such as the OCED, were created and funded by Congress under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Experts highlight that Cabinet secretaries have limited authority to reorganize offices established through congressional action without obtaining congressional

    energyrenewable-energyfusion-energyDepartment-of-Energyenergy-policyclean-energyenergy-infrastructure
  • US DOE to Loan West Virginia Utilities $1.44B to Extend Life of 6 High-Cost Coal Plants - CleanTechnica

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has approved a $1.44 billion loan to West Virginia utility companies to refurbish six coal-fired power plants, extending their operational lives by up to 20 years. This funding, part of a broader initiative that includes expanding fossil fuel infrastructure with new and upgraded gas plants, will ultimately be paid for by West Virginia residents through increased electric bills over decades. The refurbishment aims to sustain coal power despite its declining competitiveness and significant public health impacts. Critics, including the West Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club, argue that these investments are short-sighted and financially burdensome for ratepayers, as many of the coal plants operate less than half the time due to competition from cheaper energy sources. The Sierra Club highlights the health consequences of coal plants, which currently cause hundreds of hospital visits and dozens of deaths annually within West Virginia, as well as hundreds of deaths in neighboring states. They advocate for a transition to cleaner, safer, and more cost-effective energy

    energycoal-power-plantsUS-Department-of-Energyutility-loansfossil-fuelsenergy-policyclean-energy-transition
  • Someone Is Losing The War On Renewable Energy, Part Infinity

    The article discusses the challenges and developments in the US renewable energy sector amid restrictive federal policies under the Trump administration, particularly targeting wind and solar power. The “American Energy Dominance” policy has curtailed offshore wind projects by limiting federal offshore lease areas, causing several projects, including Invenergy’s 2.4-gigawatt Leading Light Wind project off New Jersey, to be abandoned. Onshore wind faces similar hurdles, with federal land closures and increasing state and local restrictions. Despite these obstacles, the commissioning of Arkansas’s first utility-scale wind farm, the 135-megawatt Crossover Wind project by Canadian developer Cordelio Power, marks a significant breakthrough and suggests potential growth in renewable energy within the state. Cordelio Power highlighted strong local collaboration in Cross County, Arkansas, where the project is expected to generate substantial economic benefits. Landowners will receive over $50 million in lease payments over the project’s lifespan, and local taxpayers will gain nearly $950,000 annually. This infusion of

    energyrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powerenergy-policyutility-scale-wind-farmclean-energy
  • The Data Center Resistance Has Arrived

    A recent report from Data Center Watch, a project by AI security firm 10a Labs, reveals a sharp rise in local opposition to data center developments across the United States, particularly in red states like Georgia and Indiana. This surge in resistance coincides with a boom in data center construction, fueled partly by generous tax incentives, making Georgia one of the fastest-growing markets for these facilities. The report highlights that between March and June 2025 alone, opposition blocked or delayed $98 billion worth of data center projects, including a notable $17 billion development near Atlanta that was halted after a local moratorium was imposed due to community pushback. The increase in opposition reflects growing concerns among residents about data centers consuming large amounts of water, electricity, and land while contributing little in taxes. This issue emerged as a significant campaign topic for Peter Hubbard, who won a seat on the Georgia Public Service Commission, signaling a political shift influenced by these local concerns. Although the report acknowledges some methodological limitations—such as increased

    energydata-centerselectricity-consumptionutility-regulationinfrastructure-developmentcommunity-oppositionenergy-policy
  • New projects will build up Canada’s clean economy, but LNG exposure invites unnecessary risk - Clean Energy Canada

    Rachel Doran, executive director of Clean Energy Canada, responded to the federal government’s announcement on national interest projects by highlighting a positive shift toward clean economy initiatives. Of the 11 projects designated, eight focus on clean economy sectors—five in critical minerals and three in clean energy and transmission—while only two involve fossil fuels. Doran emphasized that global energy employment growth is driven almost entirely by clean energy, with many countries adopting net-zero commitments, carbon pricing, and policies favoring electrification, such as domestic EV requirements and carbon border adjustments. However, Doran cautioned against the government’s support for new liquefied natural gas (LNG) production, citing the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) outlook that LNG supply is outpacing demand, which is expected to lead to falling prices and potential stranded assets by 2030. She warned that investing in LNG could burden Canadian taxpayers with subsidies for unprofitable projects, lost jobs, and unrealized revenues. Instead, Doran

    clean-energyLNGcritical-mineralselectrificationenergy-policyclean-economynatural-gas
  • US President Caught Napping By US Solar Industry

    The article discusses the resilience and ongoing growth of the US solar industry despite challenges posed during President Donald Trump’s administration. Although investment in solar and wind energy slowed in the first half of 2025, the industry has maintained enough momentum to continue expanding into the coming years. A Deloitte report highlights that renewable energy projects accounted for 93% of new power generation capacity additions in early 2025, with solar and storage making up 83% of that growth. The report also notes that new regulations targeting foreign entities from countries like China and Russia could reduce overseas competition, potentially boosting domestic solar deployment in 2026. Deloitte further emphasizes that solar power remains cost-competitive with natural gas even without tax credits, which are still available for projects initiated before certain deadlines. However, the firm projects a decline in annual solar, wind, and storage capacity additions between 2026 and 2030 compared to previous estimates, partly due to legislative and regulatory factors. Despite this slowdown, the industry’s projected growth

    energysolar-powerrenewable-energyUS-solar-industryenergy-policyclean-energyenergy-storage
  • Are Clean Tech Stocks Really On The Rise? Or Are Bubbles Artificially Boosting Valuations? - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica examines the recent surge in clean tech stocks, highlighting a complex interplay of factors behind investor optimism. Despite political resistance in the U.S., notably from former President Trump’s dismissive stance on renewables, renewable energy is expanding globally faster than fossil fuels, with projections suggesting oil demand may peak around 2030. This growth fuels enthusiasm in clean energy indices, yet the article questions whether this rise is fully justified or artificially inflated by speculative bubbles. Regulatory challenges also complicate the landscape, as some argue that easing regulations could accelerate innovation, while others warn that insufficient oversight risks safety and effectiveness, potentially undermining long-term climate goals. The article also explores how the booming AI sector intersects with clean tech, noting that massive investments in data centers and chips are driving electricity demand, often still met by fossil fuels. This raises concerns about the sustainability of AI-driven growth and its impact on energy markets. Additionally, regulatory hurdles are slowing the deployment of promising technologies like robotaxis, with contrasting

    energyclean-energyrenewable-energyAI-energy-demandelectric-vehiclesenergy-stocksenergy-policy
  • Crocodile Economics Comes to Africa: Trade, Solar, and the New Energy Map - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses a significant shift in the global energy and economic landscape, highlighting Africa as the emerging focal point for growth and energy transition. The concept of "crocodile economics"—where GDP grows while emissions decline—is already evident in much of the world, including Europe, North America, and increasingly China. The author argues that Africa, through the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), is poised to become a major unified economic bloc, with 54 of 55 countries signed on and 48 ratified, representing 1.4 billion people and a $4.3 trillion combined GDP. This integration fosters predictable cross-border trade and continental supply chains, mirroring the European Coal and Steel Community’s role in Europe’s economic development. Simultaneously, Africa is experiencing a rapid increase in solar energy adoption, importing approximately 15 GW of solar panels in the year leading to mid-2025—a 60% increase from the previous year—with South Africa alone accounting for 3

    energysolar-energyAfricaclean-energyenergy-traderenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • The People’s Solar: How Plug-In Solar Could Bring Affordable Energy To 60 Million Americans - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the transformative potential of plug-in solar systems to bring affordable clean energy to millions of Americans currently excluded from traditional rooftop solar adoption. Traditional solar installations, while effective for many homeowners, remain inaccessible to about 70% of households due to factors like renting, shared roofs, high upfront costs, and financing barriers. Plug-in solar systems—small, modular panels that plug directly into household outlets—offer a low-cost, self-installed alternative that requires no contractors, permits, or complex utility approvals. These systems can generate up to 1,200 watts, offsetting a significant portion of daytime energy use, and can be paired with batteries for backup power. With modest state-level regulatory reforms, plug-in solar could reach 60 million Americans by 2035 and substantially reduce household electricity expenses without public subsidies. The article cites Utah’s 2025 legislation (H.B. 340) as a pioneering example, where exempting small systems from stringent interconnection rules led to a

    energysolar-energyplug-in-solarclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-affordability
  • Big News: 3 Free Hours of Power - CleanTechnica

    The Australian government is introducing the Solar Sharer energy reform, starting next July, which will provide the public with three hours of free electricity daily in South East Queensland, South Australia, and New South Wales, with other states joining by 2027. This initiative aims to reduce electricity bills by approximately AU$800 annually for consumers who adjust their usage accordingly. The reform addresses the issue of excess solar energy generated during midday, which currently leads to grid curtailment and wasted power. By offering free electricity during peak solar production hours, the government hopes to encourage better energy use and reduce waste, benefiting households without solar installations, such as renters and apartment dwellers. The reform particularly benefits those who can shift high-energy activities—like running electric hot water systems, air conditioning, washing machines, and dryers—to the free power window. While retirees and those at home during the day can easily adapt, workers might use appliance timers or negotiate with employers to take advantage of free electricity at workplaces. The policy also encourages

    energysolar-powerelectricityrenewable-energybattery-storageelectric-appliancesenergy-policy
  • Millions to receive free electricity in 2026 thanks to Australia’s solar boom

    Australia is set to provide millions of electricity customers in New South Wales, South Australia, and southeastern Queensland with up to three hours of free electricity daily starting in July 2026, thanks to the country’s rapid expansion of rooftop solar power. Over a third of Australian homes now have solar panels, driven by significant cost reductions in solar installations. The new Solar Sharer plan will allow all households with smart meters to benefit from excess solar energy, even if they do not have solar panels themselves, enabling residents in apartments or unsuitable rooftops to access free solar power generated by their neighbors. The initiative encourages shifting electricity use to peak solar production hours, likely between 11 am and 2 pm, to better align demand with renewable supply. This demand shift will reduce reliance on coal and gas power during nighttime and decrease the need for grid-scale batteries to store excess solar energy. Customers must opt into the plan, and smart appliances can optimize usage during free electricity periods, such as timing electric vehicle charging or laundry loads

    energysolar-powerrenewable-energysmart-meterselectricity-gridenergy-policyAustralia-energy-initiatives
  • American Voters To MAGA - YOU'RE FIRED! - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights a significant electoral rebuke of Republican candidates, particularly those aligned with the MAGA movement, in recent American elections. Voters decisively rejected many Republican contenders across various races, from high-profile gubernatorial contests to local positions like the Georgia Public Service Commission. Notable victories for Democrats included Mamdani’s win over Andrew Cuomo in New York City by 9 points, Mikie Sherrill’s 13% margin in New Jersey’s governor race, and Abigail Spanberger becoming Virginia’s first female governor with a 57-42% victory. These outcomes reflect widespread voter dissatisfaction with the policies and rhetoric associated with the MAGA faction. The article places special emphasis on the Georgia Public Service Commission elections, which, while typically low-profile, carry national significance due to their impact on utility regulation and energy policy. Democrats Peter Hubbard and Alicia Johnson won seats on the commission, marking a potential turning point in a body that had been Republican-controlled since 2007. This

    energypublic-service-commissionutility-ratesGeorgia-Powerelectionsenergy-policypolitical-impact
  • SEIA Says Solar Still Cheapest Source Of Electricity, Australia Unveils Free Solar Plan - CleanTechnica

    The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) emphasizes that solar power remains the cheapest source of electricity in the United States, despite ongoing political and regulatory challenges. SEIA criticizes the current U.S. administration, particularly Energy Secretary Chris Wright, for favoring fossil fuels through substantial subsidies and policies that hinder renewable energy development. The association highlights that fossil fuels have historically benefited from massive, often hidden, government subsidies—over $16 billion in 2023 and $30 billion projected in 2024—while clean energy tax credits have been reduced. SEIA argues this creates an uneven playing field, contradicting claims of fair competition and free market principles. SEIA points out that fossil fuel subsidies include tax deductions for drilling costs and recent legislative actions that support coal, such as new tax credits for metallurgical coal and grants to extend the life of aging coal-fired plants. In contrast, solar energy continues to grow rapidly due to significant cost declines since the early 2010s, making it the most cost

    energysolar-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyfossil-fuelssubsidieselectricity-generation
  • Aussies to enjoy 3 hours of free solar power every day under new plan

    Australia will introduce the Solar Sharer program in July 2026, providing households in New South Wales, South Australia, and south-east Queensland with at least three hours of free solar power daily during sunny periods. This initiative applies to homes equipped with smart meters, enabling residents to run appliances like washing machines, air conditioners, and charge electric vehicles without electricity costs during the designated free power window. The program aims to encourage energy use when solar generation is highest, helping to reduce peak electricity prices, stabilize the grid, and minimize infrastructure expenses. The government plans to potentially expand the scheme nationally by 2027. The Solar Sharer program addresses the issue of excess rooftop solar generation in Australia, which often leads to negative electricity prices during the day but high demand at night. By incentivizing midday electricity consumption, the scheme benefits all users—whether they have solar panels or not—and supports the country’s renewable energy goals, targeting 82% renewable electricity by 2030. While clean energy advocates have praised the

    energysolar-powerrenewable-energysmart-meterselectricity-gridenergy-policyAustralia-energy-plan
  • Battery Factories Show Trump Can’t Stop Clean Energy — He Can Only Slow It - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica argues that despite the Trump administration's efforts to roll back clean energy policies in 2025, the broader transition to clean energy in the United States and globally remains unstoppable. While Trump has sought to dismantle federal incentives, withdraw from the Paris Agreement, and revive fossil fuel industries, the fundamental drivers of the energy transition—innovation, economies of scale, and technological learning—continue to push costs down and deployment forward. Solar, wind, and lithium-ion battery technologies have become increasingly affordable and efficient, making clean energy investments financially attractive regardless of political shifts. A key example of this momentum is the rapid expansion of battery manufacturing in the U.S., particularly across the Midwest and Southeast, where over 800 GWh of battery cell capacity projects have been announced or are under construction. These large-scale, multibillion-dollar projects are bound by long-term contracts and local incentives, making them resilient to policy reversals. Although Trump’s policies have slowed deployment by cutting subsidies and canceling

    energyclean-energybattery-factorieslithium-ion-batteriesrenewable-energyenergy-transitionenergy-policy
  • Dystopian Denials Of Climate Change Don't Change The Facts - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the troubling state of U.S. climate policy and democracy under the Trump administration and its allies, particularly in the context of the 2024 election. It criticizes the federal government’s shutdowns and partisan politics for disrupting critical systems and weakening government infrastructure, including climate research and policy efforts. The Department of Energy, under Trump’s leadership, has downplayed the severity of climate change and censored key terminology related to climate action, such as “decarbonization,” “sustainability,” and “carbon footprint,” effectively stifling discourse and transparency on environmental issues. The piece underscores the broader consequences of these actions, including the erosion of democratic norms and the suppression of scientific and policy communication. It stresses the importance of federal and state powers working transparently to address climate challenges, while also calling on Democrats to more forcefully advocate for economic policies that enjoy broad public support, such as raising the minimum wage and taxing the wealthy. The article warns against forgetting the ongoing

    energyclimate-changerenewable-energyenergy-policysustainabilitycarbon-emissionsclean-energy
  • Carney’s Nuclear Detour: Darlington’s SMRs Will Raise Prices, Emissions, & Political Risks - CleanTechnica

    The article critiques the Canadian federal government's decision to invest heavily in building four small modular reactors (SMRs) at Ontario Power Generation’s Darlington site, marking it as a “Major Project” with $3 billion in combined federal and provincial funding. This initiative, championed by Prime Minister Mark Carney, is positioned as a cornerstone of Canada’s clean energy and industrial strategy. However, the article argues that this move represents a strategic misstep, as it shifts Ontario away from its historically successful CANDU nuclear technology—known for reliability, domestic supply chains, and high-skilled jobs—toward an unproven, American-owned GE Hitachi SMR design. This new technology, the BWRX-300, differs significantly from CANDU reactors, requiring enriched uranium and fixed refueling cycles, and depends on U.S. supply chains and regulatory frameworks, introducing technical, economic, and political risks. The article emphasizes that Darlington’s existing nuclear operations already provide stable, well-paying employment for

    energynuclear-energysmall-modular-reactorsclean-powerOntario-Power-Generationenergy-policynuclear-engineering
  • CenterPoint Energy Announces Costly Intention to Backtrack on Coal Retirements, Keeping Expensive Culley Plant Online Past 2027 - CleanTechnica

    CenterPoint Energy has announced plans to reverse its previous commitment to retire all coal plants by 2027, specifically intending to keep the aging Culley Unit 3 coal plant operational beyond that date. The utility acknowledged that coal plants, including Culley, struggle to compete with renewable and gas energy on short-term costs and suffer from increased maintenance and frequent outages due to their outdated design. Despite studies indicating that retiring Culley Unit 3 would be the lowest-cost option, CenterPoint did not consider retirement before 2032, raising concerns about higher costs and reliability risks for customers. Environmental advocates, including Nicole Chandler of Southwest Indiana Beyond Coal, criticized CenterPoint’s decision, highlighting the plant’s age, unreliability, and high maintenance costs. They argue that extending Culley’s operation contradicts the promise to transition to cleaner, more affordable energy sources like solar and wind. The Sierra Club, a prominent environmental organization, supports efforts to move away from coal to protect community health and promote sustainable energy solutions.

    energycoal-powerrenewable-energypower-plant-maintenanceenergy-policyclean-energy-transitionutility-bills
  • "Energy Dominance" Means Forcing Other Countries To Buy Your LNG - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critiques the U.S. administration’s concept of “energy dominance,” characterizing it as a coercive strategy to compel other countries to purchase U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG), even at the expense of global climate goals. It highlights tensions surrounding the European Commission’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which mandates large companies to identify and address human rights and environmental impacts in their operations and supply chains, and to implement climate transition plans aligned with the Paris Agreement’s 2050 neutrality target. While the directive aims to enforce corporate accountability for climate action, it faces strong opposition from affected corporations and foreign governments. Specifically, the article details a joint letter from U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Qatari Minister Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi to the European Commission, expressing serious concerns about the CSDDD’s impact on LNG export competitiveness and energy affordability in the EU. They warn that the directive’s provisions—especially

    energyLNGenergy-policyclimate-changeEuropean-CommissionCorporate-Sustainability-Due-Diligence-Directiveenergy-exports
  • Solar Energy Industries Association President & CEO to Step Down After Transformative 9 Years of Leadership - CleanTechnica

    Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), is set to step down effective January 30, 2026, after a transformative nine-year leadership period. During her tenure, Hopper significantly expanded the U.S. solar and storage industry, overseeing growth from 36 gigawatts (GW) to over 255 GW of installed capacity and increasing annual investment from $16 billion to more than $70 billion. Under her guidance, the U.S. rose from 14th to 3rd globally in solar manufacturing, and the industry became a major economic force and leading source of new power in the country. Hopper’s leadership was marked by major policy victories and initiatives that enhanced the industry's maturity, inclusivity, and professionalism. She launched programs such as the Solar Sisters network and the Solar and Storage Industries Institute (SI2), and advanced efforts on supply chain traceability, recycling, land use, and consumer protection. SEIA’s board praised her visionary and

    energysolar-energyclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-storagesolar-industryenergy-policy
  • An Open Letter to the Solar and Storage Industry - CleanTechnica

    Abigail Ross Hopper, President and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), announced her decision to step down effective January 30, 2026, after nearly nine years leading the organization. In her open letter, Hopper reflects on the significant growth and transformation of the U.S. solar industry during her tenure. When she began in 2017, the industry was emerging with 36 gigawatts (GW) of capacity and just over 1 million residential solar customers. Today, the industry boasts over 255 GW of capacity and more than 5.5 million residential customers, with the U.S. rising to the third largest solar manufacturing economy globally. Hopper credits this progress to collective determination, successful navigation of policy challenges, and historic policy victories that have laid a strong foundation for future growth. Beyond market expansion, Hopper emphasizes the industry's commitment to sustainability, inclusivity, and accountability. Initiatives such as Solar Sisters, the Solar and Storage Industries Institute, and Solar Uncommon Dialogue

    energysolar-energyenergy-storagerenewable-energysolar-industryclean-energyenergy-policy
  • The US Wind Industry Is Still Alive And Kicking, Despite Headwinds

    The article discusses the resilience of the US wind industry despite significant challenges, including targeted federal policies under President Donald Trump and opposition from fossil fuel interests and local communities. Although wind installations declined by 15% in the first half of 2025 compared to 2024, projections indicate a strong rebound in the latter half of the year, with an expected total installation of 7.7 gigawatts for 2025. This suggests that the industry remains viable and poised for growth despite recent setbacks. Looking ahead, a report by Wood Mackenzie and American Clean Power forecasts an average annual addition of 9.1 gigawatts of new wind capacity through 2029, totaling approximately 46 gigawatts. Most of this growth will come from onshore wind farms, with offshore projects contributing a smaller portion amid regulatory uncertainties and federal stop-work orders. The anticipated total wind capacity of 196.5 gigawatts by 2029 is expected to surpass the current US coal power capacity of

    energywind-powerrenewable-energyUS-wind-industryoffshore-windclean-energyenergy-policy
  • Bill Gates’s old climate lobbyists launch a new firm

    In March 2025, Bill Gates’s Breakthrough Energy organization disbanded its energy policy team, resulting in the loss of dozens of staffers, after Gates concluded that the lobbying group would struggle to make progress under the Trump administration. Subsequently, some former members of this team have launched a new nonprofit called CleanEcon, which shares a similar mission of promoting clean energy by focusing on its potential to become more cost-competitive with fossil fuels in the near future. CleanEcon is supported by over ten undisclosed funders, including philanthropists and venture capitalists, and is led by Aliya Haq, former vice president of U.S. policy and advocacy at Breakthrough Energy. The organization’s three primary goals are to accelerate the construction of energy projects, drive innovation to reduce costs, and reduce investment risks in clean energy industries. This new effort reflects a continued commitment to advancing clean energy solutions despite previous setbacks in policy advocacy.

    energyclean-energyclimate-changerenewable-energyenergy-innovationsustainable-energyenergy-policy
  • Courts Step In To Protect Citizens When Government Refuses To Do Its Job - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the ongoing conflict between certain U.S. states and the federal government regarding the cancellation of the $7 billion Solar For All program. This initiative aimed to expand access to solar energy for low- and moderate-income households, particularly benefiting those who cannot install solar panels themselves, such as renters or residents of disadvantaged communities. The program was projected to help 900,000 households reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, lower utility bills by over $350 million annually, and promote environmental justice. However, the Biden administration, under EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, terminated the program in August 2025, labeling it a "boondoggle," despite its broad support and Congressional approval. In response, nearly two dozen states, including California and Arizona, have filed lawsuits to reinstate the program, arguing that its cancellation disproportionately harms disadvantaged communities and undermines efforts to combat pollution and high energy costs. California’s Attorney General Rob Bonta criticized the administration for favoring fossil fuel interests over

    energysolar-energyrenewable-energysolar-powerenergy-policycommunity-solarenergy-grants
  • Tesla's Mission Has Been Completely Assaulted By Current US Policy - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses how Tesla’s original mission—to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and sustainable energy—has been severely undermined by current U.S. policies, particularly under the Trump administration. Initially, Tesla aimed to push the auto industry toward electrification and later expanded its mission to include solar energy after acquiring SolarCity. However, political shifts and Elon Musk’s involvement in supporting Donald Trump, whose administration and Republican allies have largely opposed renewable energy initiatives, have coincided with a significant rollback of clean energy progress in the U.S. The article highlights numerous setbacks: automakers have scaled back EV production plans; major solar projects like Esmeralda 7 have been stalled by regulatory red tape; offshore wind projects have been delayed despite prior approvals and investments; and the U.S. government has retreated from clean energy and climate goals. These actions contrast sharply with the administration’s support for fossil fuel industries, which face fewer regulatory hurdles. The cumulative effect is described as a

    energyrenewable-energyelectric-vehiclesTeslasolar-powerclean-technologyenergy-policy
  • Renewables In America Will Continue To Rise Despite The Loss Of Incentives - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights that despite the Biden administration’s recent cancellation of wind and solar projects and the impending expiration of federal tax incentives on July 1, 2026, renewable energy development in the U.S. will continue to grow significantly over the next two years. This surge is driven by a large pipeline of projects already underway, with developers rushing to "start" projects before the deadline to qualify for tax credits. The definition of "started" remains unclear and will be determined by the IRS, creating uncertainty. Large companies are front-loading investments, such as ordering expensive equipment early, to meet the criteria, while smaller developers may sell projects to better-funded firms. Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm confirmed this rush, predicting a spike in renewable capacity additions followed by a decline unless political control shifts in Congress. The momentum behind renewables is fueled not only by subsidies but also by strong market demand and the relative speed and cost-effectiveness of solar and battery installations compared to natural gas or nuclear plants

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerbatteriesenergy-policyclean-energyUS-energy-market
  • Anti-Solar Actions In USA Are Restricting Energy Supply; Right When The Grid Can Least Afford It - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights how the Trump Administration's policies are significantly restricting the growth of solar energy in the United States at a critical time when electricity demand is surging. Despite solar energy being the fastest-growing source of new generation capacity—adding more new capacity in 2024 than any other technology in two decades—the administration has implemented a series of measures that undermine this progress. These include changes to tax policy (notably HR 1), cancellation of key grid improvements and solar grants by the Department of Energy, bureaucratic delays and cancellations of large solar projects by the Department of the Interior, and upcoming guidance that could further restrict financing. These actions have slowed solar deployment, created investor uncertainty, caused job losses, and led to project cancellations. The consequences of these anti-solar policies are stark. Forecasts from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie show that new solar capacity additions could decline by 27% from 2026 to 2030, translating to

    energysolar-energyclean-energyenergy-policyelectricity-gridrenewable-energyenergy-regulation
  • Local Florida Governments Sue DeSantis Over Laws That Block Climate Action - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses a significant legal battle unfolding in Florida, where 25 local governments, including Manatee County, have sued Governor Ron DeSantis and his administration over the recently enacted SB 180 law. This legislation, effective July 1, 2024, restricts local governments from implementing climate resilience and sustainability measures in their planning and zoning regulations. The law freezes local land development policies retroactively to August 2024 and prohibits any local restrictions that are “more restrictive or burdensome” than state standards. It also blocks state support for renewable energy initiatives, bans offshore wind turbine construction in state waters, and limits local authority over fuel use in appliances. These measures undermine local efforts to address climate change and disaster resilience, particularly in vulnerable coastal areas. Manatee County’s proposed comprehensive plan amendments, which included protecting wetlands by restricting development near marshes and controlling urban sprawl, were deemed violations of SB 180. The county faces threats of funding cuts and removal of officials for pursuing these climate-focused

    energyclimate-changerenewable-energyoffshore-wind-turbinesenergy-policysustainabilitydisaster-resilience
  • Nevada’s Lost Sunlight: What Esmeralda 7 Tells Us About America’s Energy Future - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the quiet cancellation of Esmeralda 7, a massive 6.2 GW solar and battery project in Nevada, following a subtle change by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Esmeralda 7, backed by major developers like NextEra and Invenergy, was poised to supply clean energy to millions and had progressed through significant environmental reviews. However, under Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the Trump administration replaced the decade-old renewable development framework with more restrictive policies that fragmented project approvals, increased political oversight, and imposed new barriers such as a “capacity density” test and higher land leasing fees. These changes disrupted the shared environmental and permitting processes essential for Esmeralda 7’s economic viability, effectively dooming the project. This policy shift reflects a broader trend within the Interior Department favoring oil and gas extraction over large-scale renewable projects on public lands, despite rhetoric promoting “energy abundance.” The cancellation of Esmeralda 7 has significant implications for Nevada’s energy future,

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerbattery-storageclean-energy-projectsenergy-policyUnited-States-energy
  • The Economics Of Renewables — The Bottom Line Is Often Hidden By Hyperbole - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica addresses the widespread misinformation and political opposition surrounding renewable energy, particularly from right-wing governments and fossil fuel interests. Critics often rely on outdated data or political motivations to claim that renewables are too expensive compared to fossil fuels, despite evidence to the contrary. The piece highlights former President Trump’s vocal anti-renewables stance, including efforts to dismantle renewable subsidies and infrastructure, which contrasts with data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) showing a more balanced and reliable energy mix. It also notes that clean energy investments offer better long-term returns, as renewable hardware generates electricity over decades, unlike fossil fuels which are consumed immediately. The article further counters common myths about renewable energy reliability, citing advances in battery storage technology that allow surplus solar power to be stored and used when needed, enhancing grid stability. This progress is not limited to the U.S.; for example, in France, serious economic analyses have debunked exaggerated cost claims about renewable development, showing more reasonable

    energyrenewable-energyclean-energyenergy-policyfossil-fuelsenergy-subsidiesenergy-transition
  • The Automakers That Completely Dropped The Ball On End Of US EV Tax Credit - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights a notable disparity in U.S. electric vehicle (EV) sales growth among automakers in the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. While some companies experienced significant EV sales increases, several major automakers saw declines, indicating missed opportunities amid favorable market conditions and the end of the U.S. EV tax credit. Specifically, models like the Acura ZDX, BMW iX, Lexus RZ, Nissan EV lineup (ARIYA and LEAF), Subaru Solterra, and Toyota BZ4X all reported year-over-year sales drops ranging from about 7.5% to as much as 61%. The article criticizes these automakers for failing to capitalize on the growing EV market and the momentum generated by positive industry headlines. It suggests that despite overall market growth, these companies either lacked effective strategies or execution to maintain or grow their EV sales during this critical period. The piece also notes that some companies have yet to report

    electric-vehiclesEV-tax-creditautomotive-industryelectric-mobilityrenewable-energyclean-technologyenergy-policy
  • Why US Power Bills Are Surging

    The article explains the recent surge in U.S. electricity bills, which have risen by more than 30 percent on average since 2020, causing widespread financial strain for consumers and economic disruption across multiple sectors. Several factors contribute to this increase, including rising electricity demand, volatile fuel prices, inflation, tariffs, delays in building new transmission lines, and slow additions of new power generators. These combined pressures suggest that high electricity prices may persist for the foreseeable future. The impact is particularly severe on lower- and moderate-income households, many of whom are already struggling to pay bills and face increasing risks of power shutoffs. Despite the current spike in electricity costs, the article provides broader context by highlighting that overall household energy spending—covering electricity, natural gas, and gasoline—has remained relatively stable since 2000 when adjusted for inflation. This stability is partly due to a growing trend of electrification in homes, such as switching from gas furnaces to heat pumps and from gasoline vehicles to electric motors,

    energyelectricity-pricespower-billsenergy-policyenergy-crisisutility-rateselectricity-demand
  • Department of Energy cancels $7.5B of clean energy projects in mostly blue states

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the cancellation of 321 clean energy awards totaling approximately $7.56 billion. These cuts predominantly affected projects in states that supported Kamala Harris in the last presidential election, many of which are governed by Democrats, though some projects in Republican-leaning states were also canceled. Notably, significant funding was withdrawn from California’s $1.2 billion hydrogen hub project and at least 10 direct air capture (DAC) projects worth $47.3 million, although some DAC projects in Alaska, Kentucky, Louisiana, and North Dakota remain intact. The canceled awards spanned various DOE offices, including Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy and Clean Energy Demonstrations, with 26% of the awards having been granted between Election Day and Inauguration Day. These cancellations reflect the Trump administration’s broader effort to slow the transition away from fossil fuels, as evidenced by previous DOE and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contract cancellations totaling billions of dollars. Many affected

    energyclean-energyDepartment-of-Energyhydrogen-hubdirect-air-capturerenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Department of Energy cancels $7.5B of clean energy projects in Harris-voting states

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the cancellation of 321 clean energy awards totaling $7.56 billion, affecting projects primarily in 16 states that all voted for Kamala Harris in the last presidential election. Among the canceled initiatives was California’s $1.2 billion hydrogen hub project, the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems. Other impacted states include Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. These awards were originally granted across various DOE offices focused on advanced energy research, clean energy demonstrations, energy efficiency, fossil energy, grid deployment, and manufacturing supply chains. Notably, 26% of these awards were issued between Election Day and Inauguration Day, a period during which presidential authority remains active. The cancellations reflect the Trump administration’s broader effort to slow the transition away from fossil fuels, following previous DOE and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    energyclean-energyDepartment-of-Energyrenewable-energyhydrogen-hubenergy-projectsenergy-policy
  • Signs Of A Renewable Energy Comeback Appear In The US

    The article highlights emerging signs of a renewable energy resurgence in the United States despite federal policy setbacks under President Donald Trump's administration. While the current administration has imposed restrictions on wind energy development, including halting offshore wind leases and attempting to stop ongoing projects, some wind initiatives continue progressing. Notably, Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission recently approved a new 118-megawatt wind farm, signaling a potential shift in state-level energy policy. Offshore wind projects in New York, Massachusetts, and Virginia are also advancing despite federal challenges, with Virginia’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project notably avoiding interference. Texas remains a hub for renewable energy innovation, expanding beyond wind and solar into renewable natural gas (RNG) and hydrogen technologies. The University of Texas at Austin’s Hydrogen ProtoHub facility is fostering research and development of clean energy systems, including hydrogen production from sunlight and water. Collaborations with organizations like GTI Energy are exploring repurposing natural gas infrastructure for RNG and synthetic natural gas applications. Additionally

    renewable-energywind-energyoffshore-windenergy-policyclean-energyhydrogen-energyrenewable-natural-gas
  • US Government Shills For Big Coal - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica criticizes recent U.S. government actions that favor the coal industry despite environmental and economic concerns. The Interior Department plans to open 13.1 million acres of federal land for coal mining and reduce royalty rates for coal companies. The Energy Department is allocating $625 million to upgrade coal plants to extend their operational life, while the EPA intends to repeal numerous Biden-era regulations aimed at limiting coal plant emissions of carbon dioxide, mercury, and other pollutants. These moves are framed as efforts to maintain coal’s role in the U.S. energy mix, even though coal is a major contributor to climate change and often more expensive than alternatives like natural gas or solar power. The article also highlights the growing electricity demand driven by massive data centers supporting artificial intelligence advancements, such as Meta’s planned data center larger than Manhattan. This surge in demand has led to significant utility bill increases for residents near data centers, with some areas experiencing up to a 267% rise in electricity costs over five years

    energycoal-miningelectricity-generationdata-centersartificial-intelligenceenergy-policyenvironmental-regulation
  • Trump’s Energy Department forbids staff from saying ‘climate change’ or ‘green’

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), under a Trump administration appointee, has issued a directive banning staff from using a list of words and phrases related to climate and renewable energy, including “climate change,” “green,” “decarbonization,” “energy transition,” “sustainability,” and “carbon footprint.” This memo, sent to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), reflects the administration’s stance against framing energy policies in terms of environmental sustainability or emissions reduction. The ban extends even to terms like “emissions,” despite their neutral scientific meaning and legal recognition by the U.S. Supreme Court as air pollutants subject to regulation. The EERE, created in response to the 1973 energy crisis to promote renewable energy and energy efficiency, faces a shift in priorities under Trump, who favors expanding fossil fuel use and dismisses renewable energy efforts as a “green energy scam.” Trump’s rhetoric, including a recent UN speech criticizing countries investing in solar, wind

    energyrenewable-energyenergy-efficiencyclimate-changegreen-energyenergy-policysustainable-energy
  • King Trump The Fool Railed At The UNiverse, While Clean Energy Stood Waiting In The Wings - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critically examines former President Donald Trump’s address at the United Nations General Assembly on September 23, where he vehemently opposed the global green energy agenda. Trump extended his speech well beyond the allotted time, using the platform to attack renewable energy initiatives and climate science, labeling climate change concerns as falsehoods propagated by “stupid people.” His rhetoric was described as egotistical, regressive, and damaging, especially given the global consensus on the urgency of climate action. The article portrays Trump’s behavior as immature and counterproductive, highlighting how his stance isolates the U.S. from international climate collaboration and undermines progress on clean energy. In contrast, the article underscores the growing momentum of renewable energy worldwide, citing data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) and BloombergNEF that emphasize the economic and environmental benefits of wind and solar power. Despite Trump’s dismissive comments about large-scale renewable projects, the U.S. has seen significant growth in solar and wind

    energyclean-energyrenewable-energyclimate-changeUN-climate-summitgreenhouse-gas-emissionsenergy-policy
  • Ending The Solar Tax Credit May Have Hidden Benefits - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the impending expiration of the 30 percent federal tax credit for residential solar installations at the end of 2025 and explores the counterintuitive argument that ending this subsidy may actually benefit the solar industry. While the tax credit has supported growth, some industry insiders argue that rooftop solar is now a mature technology that should no longer rely on subsidies. They point out that the U.S. solar market suffers from disproportionately high "soft costs"—including installation, permitting, sales, marketing, and financing—that make residential solar two to three times more expensive than in countries like Australia. These inflated costs are partly perpetuated by subsidies, which obscure inefficiencies and enable excessive dealer fees and sales commissions. Experts cited in the article suggest that eliminating the tax credit could pressure the industry to streamline operations, reduce costs, and eliminate bad practices, ultimately leading to a more efficient and affordable solar market. However, the transition may cause short-term challenges such as slower adoption and financial strain on some companies. A

    energysolar-energysolar-tax-creditrenewable-energyresidential-solarenergy-policyclean-energy
  • 704-MW Offshore Wind Project Back On Track As Judge Slams Trump Admin - CleanTechnica

    The 704-megawatt Revolution Wind offshore project off Rhode Island, developed by Danish company Ørsted, has resumed after a federal judge ruled against the Trump administration’s stop-work order. The project, which had nearly completed foundation installation and turbine placement, was halted by former Interior Secretary Doug Burgum citing vague national security concerns despite extensive prior reviews under multiple administrations confirming its safety and compliance. Ørsted successfully sued to overturn the halt, highlighting that the project supports hundreds of jobs and aligns with the Energy Department’s goals for increased power generation capacity. The article criticizes the Trump administration’s broader stance on offshore wind, noting that it blocked new leases and used legal and administrative measures to impede approved projects and related infrastructure upgrades. This opposition contrasts with the Biden administration’s support, under which 11 new offshore wind farms have entered the pipeline. The Energy Department’s recent initiative to boost power generation notably excludes wind and solar, favoring traditional “reliable” energy sources like coal, natural gas,

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-policyclean-energypower-generation
  • California Passes Legislation to Support Solar & Lower Energy Costs - CleanTechnica

    California has recently passed two significant pieces of legislation—Assembly Bill 825 and Senate Bill 302—aimed at advancing solar energy development and creating a more integrated clean energy grid in the Western United States. AB 825 initiates the establishment of a regional electricity partnership across Western states, a move long advocated by renewable energy supporters, which is expected to enhance energy production efficiency, grid reliability, and ultimately reduce electricity costs for Californians. Senate Bill 302 aligns California’s tax code with the federal Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) by exempting solar developers from state taxes on federal renewable energy tax benefits, a step that brings California in line with most other states and helps lower project costs. These legislative efforts come amid ongoing challenges from federal policies that have hindered solar development and increased energy prices. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) praised the bills, emphasizing their potential to expand market access for California’s solar and storage resources and to ensure that energy developers can fully benefit from federal incentives. Governor

    energysolar-energyclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-legislationCalifornia-energy
  • Young Environmentalists Sue Over Executive Orders That Benefit Fossil Fuels - CleanTechnica

    A group of young environmentalists, previously successful in suing the state of Montana for violating its constitutional guarantee of a safe and clean environment, have now joined forces with other youth activists to sue the federal government. They seek to block several presidential executive orders issued this year that promote fossil fuel production under the guise of a national energy emergency. The lawsuit, supported by the nonprofit legal organization Our Children’s Trust, argues that these executive orders are unlawful and violate the state-created danger doctrine, which prohibits government actions that harm citizens. The case, heard in a federal courtroom in Missoula, Montana, marks the first time a youth-led constitutional climate lawsuit has included live testimony at the federal level. Plaintiffs and expert witnesses, including prominent academics and former White House advisor John Podesta, testified that the executive orders will exacerbate the climate crisis and jeopardize the health and future of young people and their communities. The federal government, however, did not present any witnesses and has moved to dismiss the case, following a

    energyfossil-fuelsclimate-changeenvironmental-lawrenewable-energyenergy-policylegal-activism
  • Capitalism at a Crossroads: Profit & Public Purpose in Clean Energy - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses Brett Christophers’ analysis of the challenges facing the clean energy transition, as presented in his book. Despite renewable energy often being cheaper to produce than fossil fuels, investment levels remain insufficient to meet climate goals. Christophers attributes this to the profit-driven nature of private capital, which finds renewables less attractive due to their low marginal costs and resulting thin profit margins. In contrast, fossil fuels maintain profitability through controlled scarcity and market structures favoring incumbents. Consequently, relying solely on private investment will not accelerate the transition fast enough, and the state must play a much larger role by owning infrastructure or guaranteeing returns through subsidies and long-term contracts. Christophers argues that electricity should be treated as a public good, better managed through planned, coordinated investment rather than volatile spot markets. He calls for a significant expansion of public ownership and leadership in renewable energy, effectively socializing electrical generation to bypass profit motives that hinder progress. However, critics note that the situation is more nuanced: renewable profitability varies by

    energyrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-powerwind-energyenergy-investmentenergy-policy
  • A Huge Floating Offshore Wind Opportunity Floats Away

    The article discusses the significant setbacks faced by the U.S. offshore wind industry under the Trump administration, particularly during his second term. Offshore wind, especially floating offshore wind technology, represents a major opportunity for the U.S. given its extensive coastal resources, including shallow Atlantic waters suitable for monopile turbines and deeper waters along the Pacific coast ideal for floating platforms. These floating platforms offer advantages such as avoiding conflicts with fishing, shipping, and naval operations, as well as preserving coastal views. Despite this potential, the Trump administration has aggressively targeted and dismantled much of the domestic offshore wind sector, resulting in job losses and lost economic opportunities. A key example highlighted is the Department of Justice’s September 2023 reversal of approval for the Maryland Offshore Wind Project, which had previously been fully permitted by state and federal agencies. This move has drawn sharp criticism from industry groups like the Oceanic Network, which warn that such actions will raise electricity costs, deter private investment, delay economic growth, and weaken the power grid

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyfloating-wind-platformswind-turbinesclean-energyenergy-policy
  • From Ørsted to Ontario: How Populist Conservatives Undermine Contract Sanctity - CleanTechnica

    The article highlights a troubling pattern in conservative-led jurisdictions where populist governments undermine the sanctity of contracts in the renewable energy sector, creating significant risks for investors and developers. It begins with the Trump administration’s abrupt stop-work order on Ørsted’s nearly completed Revolution Wind project, justified vaguely by “national security” concerns despite all permits being secured and billions already invested. This move, now challenged in court, signals that even fully permitted and financed projects can be halted arbitrarily under populist conservative administrations in the U.S. The article situates this case within a broader trend seen in places like Ontario, Texas, and Alberta. In Ontario, Doug Ford’s government canceled 758 renewable energy contracts in 2018, including operational wind farms, and retroactively blocked legal recourse, causing massive financial losses and sending a clear political message that contracts are not guaranteed if the government disapproves. Texas saw a legislative attempt (SB 715) to retroactively impose new requirements on existing renewable projects,

    energyrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-policycontract-lawoffshore-windenergy-investment
  • Trump Promised Abundant Energy But Has Only Delivered Deficits - CleanTechnica

    The article critiques the Trump administration’s energy policies, highlighting a gap between promises of abundant, affordable energy and the reality of growing deficits and reliance on fossil fuels. While Energy Secretary Chris Wright praised the administration’s approach during a visit to Europe, European leaders prioritize renewable energy to achieve energy independence and aggressively reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050. The U.S. approach, labeled by Wright as “climate ideology,” contrasts sharply with Europe’s forward-looking stance. Despite efforts by the Trump administration to undermine climate science—such as disbanding a controversial research group and promoting climate skepticism—renewable energy use in the U.S. has grown significantly, reaching nearly 25% of power generation by June, driven largely by investments made before Trump’s presidency. The article also points out that many of Trump’s economic and energy promises, including halving energy prices and reducing gasoline costs below $2 per gallon, have not materialized. Instead,

    energyrenewable-energyclimate-changefossil-fuelspower-generationclean-energyenergy-policy
  • Small Modular Reactors and the Big Questions of Cost & Waste - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critically examines the claims surrounding Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) as a transformative technology for nuclear energy and decarbonization. While SMRs are promoted as cheaper, safer, faster to build, and easier to finance than traditional large reactors, a recent study published in Progress in Nuclear Energy challenges these assertions. Authored by experts Philseo Kim and Allison Macfarlane, the study analyzes both economic and waste management aspects of SMRs. It finds significant uncertainties and structural challenges, particularly highlighting that SMRs may have higher levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) than anticipated, often exceeding $100 per MWh, due largely to the loss of economies of scale inherent in smaller reactors. Real-world projects, such as NuScale’s canceled flagship plant, underscore these cost overruns. On the waste front, the study reveals even more concerning issues. SMRs could produce two to thirty times more spent fuel per unit of energy compared to conventional reactors, with smaller

    energynuclear-energysmall-modular-reactorsSMRsnuclear-wastedecarbonizationenergy-policy
  • Oklo to open first private nuclear fuel recycling facility in the US

    Oklo Inc., a nuclear technology company, is set to open the United States’ first privately funded nuclear fuel recycling facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, with an investment of up to $1.68 billion. This facility will recycle used nuclear fuel, recovering usable materials to produce new fuel for advanced reactors such as Oklo’s Aurora powerhouse. The project is expected to create over 800 jobs and aims to reduce nuclear waste while establishing a secure domestic supply chain for clean, reliable, and affordable energy. Oklo is also exploring a partnership with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to recycle TVA’s used nuclear fuel, marking the first time a U.S. utility has considered converting its spent fuel into clean electricity. The United States currently stores over 94,000 metric tons of used nuclear fuel, which contains energy equivalent to about 1.3 trillion barrels of oil—five times the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. By unlocking this energy through modern recycling processes, Oklo’s initiative could significantly contribute

    energynuclear-energyfuel-recyclingadvanced-reactorsclean-energyenergy-policynuclear-technology
  • The Labor Day Legacy Of Offshore Wind Workers - CleanTechnica

    The article commemorates Labor Day by highlighting the historical significance of workers' contributions to the U.S. economy and society, focusing particularly on offshore wind workers and the clean energy sector. It contrasts the current clean energy job growth under President Biden’s administration—with over 400,000 new jobs created and widespread investments in renewable energy projects—with the Trump administration’s policies that have hindered offshore wind development. Specifically, the Trump administration halted construction of the nearly completed Revolution Wind farm off Connecticut and Rhode Island, canceled $679 million in offshore wind funding, and withdrew a $716 million loan guarantee for a New Jersey offshore wind project. These actions jeopardize approximately 1,000 jobs and threaten the renewable energy goals of those states. Union leaders and clean energy advocates emphasize that clean energy jobs provide good wages, healthcare, and pensions, representing dignity for American workers. The article notes that clean energy investments and unionization rates have grown significantly, with the energy sector employment increasing by 3% in 2023,

    energyoffshore-windclean-energyrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-jobsenergy-policy
  • MAGA Using Laws Passed By Democrats To Upend Renewable Energy Projects - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses how laws and environmental protections originally established by progressive lawmakers to safeguard wildlife and public lands are now being exploited by MAGA-aligned officials and fossil fuel interests to hinder renewable energy projects. These laws, such as the Federal Land Policy and Management Act’s prohibition against “unnecessary or undue degradation,” are being weaponized to block wind and solar developments. Critics argue this is an abuse of environmental regulations, turning tools meant to protect nature into obstacles for clean energy expansion. A key example highlighted is the Interior Department’s recent capacity density order, which sets strict limits on how much energy can be generated per unit of land. This metric, focusing narrowly on energy density, is criticized for ignoring the broader environmental and economic benefits of renewables. Experts point out that renewable installations can be removed and land restored relatively quickly, unlike fossil fuel infrastructure that causes long-term contamination. The article suggests that this approach by the Department of the Interior effectively acts as a ban on renewable projects on federal lands

    renewable-energysolar-powerwind-energyenergy-policyenvironmental-lawfossil-fuelssustainable-energy
  • The Offshore Wind Industry Is Forever (Wind Jobs, Not So Much)

    The article discusses recent setbacks to the U.S. offshore wind industry under the Trump administration, highlighting the cancellation and defunding of key projects that have resulted in significant job losses, particularly among unionized construction workers. Specifically, it notes that an 80% complete offshore wind project in New England was abruptly halted by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, sending hundreds of workers home and undermining job stability. Additionally, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy rescinded funding for 12 port improvement projects critical to supporting offshore wind infrastructure, further exacerbating job losses in the sector. These actions reflect a broader pattern of the administration’s opposition to offshore wind development, despite the industry's technological viability and global growth prospects. The article also explores the political dynamics surrounding these job losses, pointing out the irony that some workers affected by the shutdowns may have voted for Trump, who has long campaigned against offshore wind projects. While union leaders express frustration over the disruption to workers’ livelihoods, the article notes that political support among working-class

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-powerclean-energyenergy-policyjob-impact
  • US Pressuring Other Countries To Abandon Clean Energy And Climate Goals - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the U.S. government's current efforts to undermine global clean energy and climate initiatives in favor of expanding fossil fuel use. It criticizes the administration for prioritizing fossil fuel interests by promoting “energy dominance” and opposing international agreements aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in sectors like shipping. The U.S. has reportedly threatened punitive measures such as tariffs and visa restrictions against countries supporting climate action, and has allied with oil-producing nations like Saudi Arabia to block production limits on fossil fuels. Key figures in the U.S. Energy Department have framed the choice as one between “freedom and sovereignty” through fossil fuels versus economic decline due to “climate alarmism.” European officials and climate experts express alarm over this U.S. pressure, especially given recent severe heat waves and the scientific consensus on the urgent need to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal. The article underscores the tension between the U.S. administration’s fossil fuel agenda and

    energyclean-energyfossil-fuelsclimate-goalsenergy-policyinternational-energygreenhouse-gas-emissions
  • US Flexes Its Marine Energy Muscles For 24/7 Baseload Power

    The article discusses the evolving US energy policy under the “American Energy Dominance” framework, which prioritizes traditional 24/7 baseload power sources such as coal, oil, and gas, while reducing support for wind and solar industries, especially offshore wind. However, the policy also embraces certain renewable energy sources with baseload capabilities, notably hydropower, geothermal energy, biomass, and now marine energy. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has highlighted geothermal energy’s potential, and marine energy—harnessing kinetic energy from tides, currents, and waves—is gaining recognition as a reliable, weather-independent power source with significant untapped potential. Concrete support for marine energy is evident through initiatives like the Department of Energy’s inclusion of marine energy in its collaboration with Norway and the TEAMER (Testing Expertise and Access to Marine Energy Research) program. TEAMER facilitates research and development by providing access to testing facilities and expertise, having recently awarded support to 18 new marine energy projects. These projects span tidal, hydrokin

    energymarine-energyrenewable-energybaseload-powergeothermal-energyhydropowerenergy-policy
  • Amidst Energy Prices Rise, Trump Kills Jobs, Cuts Off Renewable Energy - CleanTechnica

    The Trump Administration has issued a stop work order on the Revolution Wind offshore wind project in Rhode Island, halting progress despite the project being approximately 80% complete with 45 of 65 turbines installed. This project was designed to provide renewable energy to Rhode Island and Connecticut, supporting regional job creation and offering a clean energy alternative. The decision comes amid rising energy prices, drawing criticism for undermining efforts to expand affordable and sustainable energy sources. Environmental advocates, including the Sierra Club, have strongly condemned the administration's move. Sierra Club Climate Policy Director Patrick Drupp highlighted that offshore wind represents one of the cheapest and most reliable energy options available, and accused the Trump Administration of prioritizing fossil fuel interests over clean energy solutions. The Sierra Club, a leading grassroots environmental organization, continues to advocate for clean energy development, community health, and environmental protection through activism and policy engagement.

    energyrenewable-energyoffshore-windwind-turbinesclean-energyenergy-policyenvironmental-activism
  • Offshore Wind Vs. Natural Gas Pipeline Slugfest Emerging In US

    The article discusses recent conflicts between the US offshore wind industry and natural gas pipeline projects, highlighting government actions that have stalled key renewable energy developments. Specifically, the Interior Department has issued a stop-work order on the Revolution Wind offshore wind project off Rhode Island’s coast, despite it being 80% complete. This halt also affects Connecticut, a project partner. The official reason cited involves unspecified security concerns, which the article suggests may be a pretext. A similar freeze occurred earlier this year on New York’s Empire Wind project, which was temporarily halted but later resumed after political negotiations involving state and federal officials and the energy company Equinor. Underlying these renewable energy setbacks is the resurgence of natural gas pipeline proposals, notably the Constitution pipeline and Project Maple. The Constitution pipeline, initially proposed in 2014 to transport gas from Pennsylvania to New England, was previously rejected but has recently re-emerged and is reportedly fast-tracked for approval. Project Maple, linked to Canadian firm Enbridge, aims to expand the

    energyoffshore-windnatural-gas-pipelinerenewable-energyenergy-policyinfrastructureenvironmental-impact
  • Trump Works To Sabotage Offshore Wind Alliances - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the Trump administration’s efforts to undermine offshore wind energy projects, focusing on the nearly completed $4 billion Revolution Wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island. Despite having all necessary permits, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) halted all activities citing unspecified “concerns,” threatening the project and broader alliances among commercial fishers, environmentalists, clean energy advocates, and investors. The move has sparked legal challenges, with Connecticut and Rhode Island attorneys general condemning the freeze as harmful to renewable energy development, economic interests, and consumers who may face higher energy costs as a result. The article contrasts the Trump administration’s aggressive support for fossil fuels—including oil, gas, and coal—with its obstruction of clean energy initiatives. It notes that policies under this administration have rolled back environmental regulations, frozen federal clean energy funding, and targeted wind energy, the largest renewable power source in the U.S. The administration’s rhetoric, exemplified by DOI statements dismissing wind energy

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyclean-energywind-farmsenergy-policyfossil-fuels
  • AI & Electricity: Two Perspectives - CleanTechnica

    The article "AI & Electricity: Two Perspectives" from CleanTechnica discusses the growing concern over the substantial electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence (AI) data centers. Analyses suggest that within a few years, AI data centers could consume up to 12% of the United States' total electrical demand. This surge in power consumption comes at a time when about 90% of new electricity generation is from renewable sources like wind and solar. However, current U.S. government policies are criticized for favoring expensive and polluting energy sources such as coal and methane, which could exacerbate electricity costs for consumers and manufacturers alike. Economist Paul Krugman highlights the economic implications of rising electricity costs linked to AI infrastructure. He points out that utilities typically pass the cost of expanding capacity to support data centers onto ordinary customers, contributing to a recent spike in retail electricity prices that outpaces overall inflation. The largest U.S. grid operator has recommended that large data centers generate their own power to alleviate grid strain

    energyAI-energy-consumptiondata-centersrenewable-energyelectricity-pricesenergy-policypower-grid
  • New US Solar Power Plant features soil and habitat restoration.

    The article highlights a new 100-megawatt solar power plant project in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, which exemplifies the convergence of renewable energy demand, local cooperative involvement, and sustainable land management. The project is tied to Meta’s data center development at Sage Mill Industrial Park, with Silicon Ranch as the solar developer. This initiative is part of Meta’s broader strategy, marking its 18th solar project with Silicon Ranch across four states, totaling over 1,500 megawatts of capacity. The plant aims to address growing energy needs while supporting a potential solar resurgence in South Carolina, a state that has seen fluctuating solar development in recent years. A key aspect of the project is its connection to the rural electric cooperative network, specifically the Central Electric Power Cooperative and its 19 local member cooperatives. These cooperatives play a crucial role in delivering electricity to rural areas, continuing a legacy from the Great Depression era when rural communities organized their own power providers. The collaboration between Silicon Ranch

    energysolar-powerrenewable-energysolar-power-plantdata-centersenergy-policyrural-electric-cooperatives
  • US Energy Secretary Calls For An End To All Subsidies For Solar & Wind - CleanTechnica

    US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, during a visit to Ames National Laboratory in Iowa, called for an end to all federal subsidies for wind power, arguing that after 33 years of incentives, the wind industry has matured and should now compete fairly in the marketplace alongside other energy sources. Wright emphasized the need for the US to mine and refine its own critical raw materials, highlighting national security and economic concerns tied to reliance on foreign sources, particularly China. He praised Ames Laboratory’s efforts to revitalize domestic capabilities in rare earth minerals essential for technologies like electric vehicles, storage batteries, and artificial intelligence. The article critiques Wright’s stance by pointing out the irony that his personal wealth stems from fossil fuel industries that have benefited from government subsidies and lax regulations, including the externalized environmental and health costs often ignored in economic calculations. It underscores that untaxed externalities—such as pollution and climate damage—are effectively subsidies for fossil fuels, with the International Monetary Fund estimating these costs in the trillions. While Wright acknowledged climate

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-powerenergy-subsidiesfossil-fuelsenergy-policy
  • Solar & Storage Industry Statement on Treasury Department Changes to Tax Credit Guidance - CleanTechnica

    The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), led by president and CEO Abigail Ross Hopper, issued a strong statement condemning recent Treasury Department guidance that narrows the “Commence Construction” rules for energy tax credits. SEIA views this move as a politically motivated “side deal” by the administration with anti-clean energy groups, undermining Congressional intent as established in H.R. 1. The guidance is criticized for threatening thousands of small businesses in the solar industry and potentially delaying the expansion of affordable, reliable clean energy in the U.S. SEIA warns that these restrictions will increase electricity costs for American families and businesses while allowing China to gain a competitive edge in powering emerging technologies like AI. The association is actively reviewing the guidance and considering next steps to defend the industry and national interests. SEIA urges the administration to cease political interference and focus on practical solutions to meet growing energy demand and maintain U.S. competitiveness in clean energy development. Founded in 1974, SEIA represents over 1,

    energysolar-energyclean-energyenergy-tax-creditssolar-industryrenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Make America Gaslit Again - CleanTechnica

    The article "Make America Gaslit Again" from CleanTechnica discusses the looming energy shortfall in the United States due to declining fossil fuel power plants and slow development of new nuclear facilities. It highlights that no new traditional nuclear plants are currently planned, with small modular reactors unlikely to appear before 2030. Coal power is rapidly declining, with significant retirements expected, and while some new gas plants are planned, the net fossil fuel capacity is decreasing by nearly 18,608 MW over the next three years. Although substantial wind and solar capacity additions are projected, political opposition, particularly from the Trump administration, threatens to curtail renewable energy growth. The article warns that rising energy demand combined with this shortfall could lead to power reliability issues, especially impacting rural and low-income urban areas. Drawing from personal experience with resilient, non-electric home systems, the author advises individuals to prepare for potential outages by installing solar power systems with battery backups. This preparation not only offers financial benefits but could also provide critical

    energyrenewable-energynuclear-powerfossil-fuelswind-powersolar-powerenergy-policy
  • US abandons solar project to restart 615MWe nuclear plant

    The Duane Arnold Energy Center, a 615 MWe boiling water nuclear reactor in Iowa, ceased operations in 2020 after more than 45 years of service. Originally shut down due to economic reasons and damage from a 2020 derecho storm, the plant was never fully dismantled and has been maintained in a SAFSTOR state, preserving its core infrastructure. NextEra Energy, the plant’s majority owner, had initially planned to develop a solar project on the site, transferring the plant’s grid interconnection rights to this new venture. However, in 2025, NextEra formally requested the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to restore the original interconnection rights to prioritize restarting the nuclear facility instead. This shift reflects a broader national trend of reconsidering previously closed nuclear plants as part of efforts to expand carbon-free energy sources. NextEra is currently conducting a comprehensive engineering evaluation to assess the feasibility of recommissioning Duane Arnold, with initial assessments indicating the reactor remains in good condition and could potentially

    energynuclear-powersolar-energypower-plant-restartenergy-infrastructurerenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Failed US Government Wants To Dismantle Solar For All Program - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the Biden administration's Solar For All program, funded with up to $7 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act, aimed at helping low- and moderate-income households install solar energy systems and expand community solar projects. The initiative was projected to benefit 900,000 households—many in conservative "red states"—by reducing fossil fuel dependence and saving over $350 million annually in utility costs. However, the program is now facing termination efforts led by the EPA under leadership aligned with former Trump administration policies, with plans to rescind grants to 60 state agencies, nonprofits, and Native American tribes. This move is seen as prioritizing funding for tech billionaires and defense spending over support for disadvantaged communities. Despite the program's early successes, including completed solar and battery installations for Native American tribes by Indigenized Energy, the potential rollback threatens ongoing and future projects. Advocates argue that dismantling Solar For All contradicts the stated national interest in addressing the energy crisis and expanding clean energy access.

    energysolar-energyrenewable-energysolar-powerclean-energyenergy-policycommunity-solar
  • What Makes Geothermal Energy So Special?

    The article discusses the rising prominence of geothermal energy within the context of the recent “American Energy Dominance” policy, which primarily supports fossil fuels and nuclear power while limiting federal backing for wind and solar energy. Geothermal energy stands out because it can provide reliable baseload power—continuous electricity generation regardless of weather—putting it in direct competition with coal and natural gas. Unlike biomass and hydropower, which have geographic and resource limitations, geothermal energy’s potential is expanding due to innovative technologies such as enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) and advanced closed-loop systems (ACLs). These advances, combined with improved drilling techniques and data analytics, are unlocking vast geothermal resources beyond traditional Western US sites, with estimates suggesting up to 90 gigawatts of geothermal power could be harnessed nationwide by 2050. Despite the policy support, the geothermal industry has faced challenges in securing favorable tax treatment and navigating regulatory hurdles. Early versions of tax legislation threatened to impose restrictive deadlines and reduce incentives, but industry advocacy

    energygeothermal-energyrenewable-energybaseload-powerenhanced-geothermal-systemsenergy-policyUS-energy
  • Republicans Put Pressure On Trump To Salvage Funding For Renewables - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses growing pressure from several Republican Senators on the Trump administration to preserve funding for renewable energy projects, particularly those supported by the Inflation Reduction Act under the Biden administration. Despite Trump’s public stance favoring an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy, his administration has actively sought to impede solar and wind energy development. Republican concerns stem from the risk that insufficient energy production could lead to consumer dissatisfaction and electoral repercussions in 2026. Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota highlights the necessity of including wind energy to meet rising power demands, noting that over half of clean energy projects initiated since the Inflation Reduction Act face jeopardy, threatening jobs and investments in communities that traditionally favor limited government intervention. Complicating the energy landscape, the oil and gas industry itself shows limited enthusiasm for expanding fossil fuel production, as market factors like oil prices and global supply-demand dynamics outweigh political incentives. Meanwhile, renewable energy’s appeal continues to grow, with 96% of new global electricity demand met by renewables last

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-energyclean-energyenergy-policyenergy-storage
  • Trump Promised to ‘Drill, Baby, Drill.’ The New Rigs Are Nowhere to Be Found

    The article examines the gap between former President Donald Trump’s campaign promise to “drill, baby, drill” and the current realities of U.S. oil and gas production under his administration. Despite efforts to roll back regulations, open more public lands for drilling at reduced royalty rates, and cut incentives for renewable energy, the increase in oil output has been modest and slower than under the previous Biden administration. Gasoline prices have remained relatively stable, and crude oil exports have actually declined compared to the previous year. The article highlights that energy markets are largely driven by global supply and demand dynamics rather than domestic policy alone. A key indicator of drilling activity, the weekly rig count published by Baker Hughes, shows a decline from 580 rigs at the start of Trump’s term to 542 recently, near a four-year low. This stagnation is largely attributed to crude oil prices hovering near the break-even point for new drilling (around $60 per barrel), combined with increased costs due to tariffs on steel and other

    energyoil-drillingfossil-fuelsoil-pricesenergy-policyoil-rigscrude-oil
  • Europe’s $750 Billion Energy Pledge To Trump Is Pure Political Theater - CleanTechnica

    In July 2025, the European Union and the United States announced a trade agreement in which Europe pledged to purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy products over three years, alongside significant investments in American infrastructure and manufacturing. This deal was hailed as a major diplomatic and economic victory for President Trump. However, analysts have criticized the energy commitment as largely symbolic political theater rather than a feasible economic plan, given the enormous scale and logistical challenges involved. Currently, the EU imports about $76 billion annually in U.S. energy, mainly LNG, petroleum, and nuclear fuels. Meeting the agreement's target would require tripling these imports almost immediately, which faces significant barriers. U.S. and European LNG infrastructure is already near capacity, and expanding export and import facilities would take years and substantial investment. Shipping constraints and long-term contracts with other suppliers further limit Europe's ability to increase U.S. energy imports rapidly. Additionally, European energy companies operate in competitive global markets and are unlikely to prioritize U.S. supplies

    energyEuropean-UnionUnited-StatesLNGenergy-infrastructureenergy-tradeenergy-policy
  • Philippine President Reconfirms Commitment To Renewable Energy, Wants "Sleeping" Projects To Wake Up - CleanTechnica

    In his July 28 State of the Nation Address, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. reaffirmed his administration’s strong commitment to expanding renewable energy in the country’s energy mix, targeting 35% renewable utilization by 2030 and 50% by 2040. Currently, renewables account for only 22% of electricity generation. He emphasized the need to “wake up” numerous stalled or “sleeping” renewable energy projects, which face challenges such as difficulties in securing land rights, delays in completing critical System Impact Studies for grid connection, bureaucratic hurdles, and lack of developer commitment. Offshore wind projects face additional obstacles due to the absence of specialized port infrastructure and a local supply chain, leading to reliance on imports and increased costs. The President urged government agencies to address these systemic issues to accelerate project development. He also highlighted ongoing efforts to diversify clean energy sources, including solar, wind, and natural gas—considered a lower-emission “bridge fuel.” Marcos announced plans to complete nearly

    energyrenewable-energyPhilippinesoffshore-windenergy-policyenergy-projectssustainable-energy
  • Wyoming Wants Renewables — Why Isn't The Trump Administration Listening? - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the conflicting dynamics in Wyoming regarding energy policy under the Trump administration. While Wyoming politicians support the “Big Beautiful Bill” that provides tax breaks to the struggling fossil fuel industry, they are simultaneously concerned about the negative impact of the Trump administration’s executive order terminating clean electricity production and investment tax credits for wind and solar projects. Wyoming generates about 10,200 megawatts of electricity, with nearly one-third coming from wind and solar, which are the fastest-growing and cheapest energy sources in the state. The loss of these tax credits threatens hundreds of renewable energy projects, potentially leading to higher electricity costs for residents and economic setbacks for the state. The Trump administration’s executive order enforces stricter deadlines for renewable projects to qualify for tax credits, requiring construction to begin before July 4, 2026, and operation by the end of 2027. This timeline is challenging given the lengthy permitting processes, especially under an administration less favorable to renewables. The order also criticizes wind and

    energyrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powerelectricity-generationenergy-policyclean-energy
  • Maine Focuses On Renewables Even As Trump Revokes Climate Policies - CleanTechnica

    Maine is advancing its clean energy agenda despite federal rollbacks under the Trump administration. Governor Janet Mills signed legislation accelerating the state's transition to 100% clean energy, setting a target of 90% renewable and 10% low or zero-carbon energy sources by 2040—moving previous goals up by a decade. The state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) has already driven significant economic benefits, including over $100 million in direct investments, nearly $900 million in operations spending, and more than 1,000 full-time jobs between 2008 and 2022. In 2023, approximately 65% of Maine’s energy came from renewable sources. Regional collaboration is a cornerstone of Maine’s strategy, with the Maine Public Utilities Commission directed to work with other New England states to negotiate competitively priced energy contracts and jointly procure clean energy, transmission, and storage projects. This cooperative approach is vital given the interconnected nature of power systems and the need to manage costs and reliability effectively.

    energyrenewable-energyclean-energyenergy-policyenergy-transitionclimate-goalsenergy-storage
  • Fortescue Cancels Flagship Hydrogen Projects: UK Should Take Notice - CleanTechnica

    Fortescue’s recent cancellation of two flagship green hydrogen projects—one in Gladstone, Australia, and another in Arizona, USA—signals significant economic challenges facing hydrogen as a mainstream energy source beyond industrial feedstock use. Despite substantial financial backing, government grants, and initial optimism, both projects proved financially unviable amid shifting policy landscapes and market realities. The Arizona project, an 80 MW facility, was undermined by the removal of US hydrogen subsidies, leading to a $150 million pre-tax loss write-off. Similarly, the Gladstone plant, partially operational and supported by about A$60 million in government grants, was shut down due to high costs and competitiveness issues, with potential grant repayments under evaluation. These setbacks underscore hydrogen’s struggle to compete economically without extensive subsidies, a pattern echoed globally as major firms like BP, Shell, and Iberdrola scale back or abandon hydrogen energy projects. The broader hydrogen industry faces mounting practical and financial hurdles, including infrastructure challenges related to storage, distribution,

    energyhydrogen-energygreen-hydrogenenergy-policyrenewable-energyenergy-infrastructureenergy-subsidies
  • The Truth About The "One Big Beautiful Bill" - CleanTechnica

    The article "The Truth About The 'One Big Beautiful Bill'" by Luke Singer and Gautam Wadhwa critically examines the implications of the recent tax and spending reconciliation bill (OBBB) on healthcare, the job market, and clean energy in the United States. A major concern highlighted is the bill’s historic rollback of Medicaid funding by over $1 trillion over the next decade, which threatens healthcare accessibility and affordability for millions, particularly seniors. Although Medicare funding remains intact, the Congressional Budget Office warns that the bill could endanger the lives of up to twelve million Americans by the end of the next decade due to increased healthcare costs and reduced access. On the economic front, the OBBB introduces tax cuts and enhanced deductions aimed at stimulating small businesses, especially in retail and hospitality, potentially boosting near-term job creation. However, many of these tax benefits are temporary and set to expire by 2028–29. The bill also negatively impacts clean energy investments by ending most federal tax credits for residential solar and

    energyrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-policyenergy-jobsclimate-crisis
  • Sizewell’s Exploding Budget Exposes Europe’s Nuclear Blindspot - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the dramatic cost escalation of the UK’s Sizewell C nuclear power project, whose budget has nearly doubled from £20 billion in 2020 to almost £38 billion today. This surge is framed not as an isolated incident but as symptomatic of broader, systemic issues within Europe’s nuclear power development efforts. Despite Europe’s ambitions to expand nuclear energy to meet climate goals, the article argues that governments and utilities have repeatedly underestimated the complexity and scale required for successful nuclear deployment. Drawing on historical evidence and expert analysis, the article outlines seven critical factors for successful nuclear programs: a strategic national priority with consistent government oversight; integration with military nuclear objectives; use of a single, fully proven standardized reactor design; deployment of large-scale gigawatt reactors; comprehensive government-supported training programs; rapid and sustained deployment over decades; and construction of numerous reactors to realize economies of scale. When applied to Europe’s European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) program, these criteria reveal significant shortcomings. European nuclear efforts lack consistent

    energynuclear-powerEuropeenergy-policynuclear-reactorsclean-energyenergy-infrastructure
  • Secretary Burgum Must Personally Approve All Renewable Energy Projects On Federal Lands - CleanTechnica

    The US Department of the Interior (DOI) has issued a directive requiring Secretary Doug Burgum’s personal approval for all wind and solar energy projects on federal lands and waters, significantly increasing scrutiny over renewable energy development. This policy shift aligns with the Trump administration’s broader agenda to reduce federal support for renewables and bolster conventional energy sources like coal, natural gas, and nuclear. The directive follows President Trump’s executive order aimed at ending subsidies for what are deemed “unreliable” and foreign-controlled energy sources, as well as the recent “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which phases out tax credits for wind and solar energy. DOI officials argue that these changes will promote grid reliability, national security, and American job creation by leveling the playing field for dispatchable energy sources. Industry and environmental groups have strongly opposed the directive, warning that the additional approval requirements could delay or derail renewable projects already vulnerable due to expiring tax incentives. They emphasize that such delays would increase costs, create uncertainty, and hinder the deployment

    energyrenewable-energyfederal-landswind-powersolar-powerenergy-policyclean-energy
  • A Zombie US Offshore Wind Project Fights For Life

    The Maryland Offshore Wind Project, a 2-gigawatt initiative led by US Wind—a Baltimore-based subsidiary of the Italian firm Renexia SpA in partnership with US asset manager Apollo Global Management—continues to advance through the federal permitting process despite significant political and regulatory challenges. Although US President Donald Trump pledged to curtail the US offshore wind industry and has taken actions to halt or delay projects, the Maryland project has persisted, reflecting the long-term nature of such developments. US Wind and Maryland Governor Wes Moore remain committed to moving forward, even as legal battles and appeals complicate progress. The project has faced criticism due to its foreign ownership, but foreign involvement in US energy projects is historically common. The permitting process has been lengthy and complex, with US Wind waiting over 13 years since its formation in 2011 to develop the offshore lease awarded by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in 2014. Key milestones were reached in late 2023, including approvals for

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyUS-WindMaryland-wind-projectwind-powerenergy-policy
  • Elon Musk Tricked Into Doing The Bidding Of The Oil Industry - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses Elon Musk’s recent political maneuvers, highlighting his departure from both the Democratic and Republican parties and his intention to start a new political party. The author critiques Musk’s political naivety, noting that attempts to break the two-party dominance in the U.S. have repeatedly failed. A key point is that Musk was effectively "tricked" into supporting the Republican Party, which aligns closely with fossil fuel interests that ultimately undermine Tesla’s business. While Democrats had enacted several pro-EV policies benefiting Tesla—such as tax credits, funding for charging infrastructure, and stricter vehicle efficiency standards—the GOP, once in full power, moved to dismantle many of these supports. The article also notes that Musk’s support for Republicans may have contributed to Donald Trump’s electoral success, despite Musk’s own companies facing investigations that were later dropped during his brief influence. Regarding Musk’s plan to launch a new political party, the author is skeptical about its viability in winning major elections, citing historical precedents

    energyelectric-vehiclesTeslaEV-batteryrenewable-energyfossil-fuel-industryenergy-policy
  • Energy Independence From The USA Is Coming For Much Of The World - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses the evolving concept of energy independence, particularly in relation to the United States and the global reliance on oil. While energy independence in the U.S. is often narrowly defined as producing enough oil domestically to meet its own needs, this perspective overlooks the complexities of oil markets and the broader global desire to reduce dependence on U.S. oil and other petrostate-controlled resources. Many countries are currently in imbalanced relationships with the U.S. due to their reliance on oil for transportation and economic stability, and they are increasingly motivated to achieve their own energy independence. A key example highlighted is Ethiopia, which has taken proactive steps toward energy independence by implementing bans on oil imports and investing in alternative energy sources. The article suggests that such moves will likely spread to dozens or even hundreds of countries, signaling a significant shift away from the century-long dominance of oil and petrostate influence. This transition toward distributed energy independence is expected to reshape global economic and political dynamics in the coming century, marking

    energyenergy-independenceoilrenewable-energydistributed-energyenergy-policyclean-energy
  • Will We Increase Coal Production To Make America Great Again? - CleanTechnica

    The article argues that despite former President Donald Trump’s promises to revive the coal industry, his policies have not and likely will not lead to a meaningful increase in coal production or coal mining jobs. During Trump’s first term, about 20% of coal mining jobs were lost, and many coal companies went bankrupt, causing the Dow Jones Coal Index to cease operations. Although Trump publicly supported coal, his administration’s promotion of fracking and natural gas created stiff competition for coal, undermining the industry’s recovery. Furthermore, the coal industry currently faces significant structural challenges, including no new coal power plants planned or under construction, and a shrinking domestic market as coal-burning capacity is expected to decline by 12-13% between 2025 and 2028. The article also highlights that coal exports, which had helped the industry recover somewhat after Trump’s first term, are now hindered by tariffs and trade tensions, limiting international demand for U.S. coal. Meanwhile, renewable energy sources like wind and solar

    energycoal-productionrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powerenergy-policypower-generation
  • Some Early Responses to Big Bad Budget Bill - CleanTechnica

    The recently passed 2025 reconciliation budget bill, controversially labeled the “One Big Beautiful Bill” by Donald Trump and Republicans, has drawn significant criticism from cleantech industry groups and environmental advocates. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), led by Abigail Ross Hopper, condemned the bill as a major setback for the U.S. energy economy, particularly at a time of rising energy costs and global instability. SEIA highlighted that the bill threatens the burgeoning solar and storage manufacturing sector, risking factory closures and job losses that would undermine rural industrial revival and cede strategic advantage to China. Despite avoiding some harmful provisions, the bill was criticized for prioritizing partisan politics over practical, growth-oriented energy solutions that promote American energy independence. Similarly, the BlueGreen Alliance criticized the bill for repealing clean energy investments that would have created millions of manufacturing and construction jobs nationwide. Their statement emphasized that the bill’s passage would shutter projects, cost jobs, weaken U.S. competitiveness in the global clean technology market, and

    energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-storageenergy-policyrenewable-energyenergy-manufacturing
  • Final GOP bill kneecaps renewables and hydrogen, but lifts nuclear and geothermal

    The recently passed Republican reconciliation act, approved by a narrow 218-214 vote and awaiting President Donald Trump’s expected signature, significantly rolls back key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) related to clean energy incentives. The bill reduces or eliminates tax credits for solar, wind, and clean hydrogen projects, while preserving some benefits for nuclear, geothermal, and battery storage technologies through 2033. Solar and wind developers must now either connect projects to the grid by the end of 2027 or begin construction within 12 months of the bill’s passage to qualify for tax credits, tightening timelines compared to previous legislation. This shift is likely to impact sectors reliant on rapid deployment of renewable energy, such as data centers and climate tech startups, with green hydrogen companies facing particularly steep challenges as their tax credits are set to expire by 2027—five years earlier than under the IRA. While geothermal, nuclear, and battery storage incentives remain largely intact, new restrictions related to “foreign entities of concern” could

    energyrenewable-energyclean-energynuclear-powergeothermal-energyhydrogen-fuelenergy-policy
  • Big Horrible Budget Bill Still Going To Kill Countless American Jobs - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica criticizes a recent large budget bill passed by Senate Republicans, arguing that it will significantly increase the US deficit by providing substantial tax cuts to billionaires and large corporations while eliminating key tax credits for the electric vehicle (EV) and solar industries. The author contends that these cuts will cost the country numerous jobs and harm the economy, particularly in Republican-controlled states, as the fossil fuel industry seeks to reduce competition from clean energy sectors to prolong profits from oil, coal, and gas. The bill is portrayed as favoring fossil fuel interests, which have strong influence over the Republican Party, and undermining America’s manufacturing resurgence and global energy leadership. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) strongly opposes the bill, warning that it will lead to higher electric bills, factory closures, job losses, and a weaker electric grid. SEIA’s president, Abigail Ross Hopper, emphasizes that the legislation would damage America’s competitiveness, destabilize its energy future, and cede technological

    energysolar-energyfossil-fuelsenergy-policyclean-energyelectric-gridenergy-jobs
  • This Reconciliation Bill Proposal Isn’t Just Misguided ... - CleanTechnica

    The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), led by president and CEO Abigail Ross Hopper, strongly criticizes the U.S. Senate's recently unveiled reconciliation bill proposal, calling it a direct attack on American energy, workers, and consumers. Hopper argues that the bill would severely harm industries that currently help lower electricity costs, boost U.S. manufacturing, and lead in new power capacity development. She warns that if the bill passes, it will result in higher power bills, job losses in factories, increased household energy expenses, greater reliance on foreign energy, and heightened risks of blackouts. SEIA emphasizes that the bill does not reform the energy system but instead sabotages it, urging lawmakers to consider the negative consequences for the economy, energy security, and everyday Americans. The association, which represents over 1,200 companies in the solar and solar-plus-storage sectors, advocates for policies that promote job creation, fair market competition, and the growth of affordable, reliable solar power. Founded in 1974,

    energysolar-energyclean-energyenergy-policyrenewable-energyenergy-industryenergy-bills
  • Cutting US Energy Credits Doesn’t Save Money. It Steals It From Ratepayers & Local Governments. - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses the ongoing Congressional debate over cutting federal clean energy tax credits, particularly those supporting solar energy. While some lawmakers view these credits as a way to reduce federal deficits, the article argues that eliminating them would be counterproductive. Solar tax credits have driven a significant industrial revival in the U.S., generating billions in GDP, federal and state tax revenues, and millions of jobs. In 2023 alone, the solar industry contributed over $75.5 billion to the U.S. economy and paid $15.7 billion in combined federal and state/local taxes. Studies show that for every dollar spent on solar tax credits, Americans save $2.67, partly due to lower electricity costs; removing these credits could increase electricity bills by $51 billion nationally, with some states facing increases over $110 per year. The article highlights the critical role of solar energy in state economies, including traditionally conservative states like Texas, Utah, Indiana, North Carolina, and Georgia, where solar contributes

    energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-tax-creditsrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-industry
  • Luján Reintroduces Community Solar Bill To Counter GOP Attacks On Clean Energy - CleanTechnica

    Senator Ben Ray Luján has reintroduced the Community Solar Consumer Choice Act in response to Republican efforts to repeal clean energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. This legislation aims to expand access to community solar projects for families and businesses historically excluded from the clean energy transition, particularly low-income households. The bill mandates electric utilities to offer community solar options to all customers, requires affordable subscription models, and prioritizes equity. It also authorizes the Department of Energy to provide financial assistance through grants, loans, and technical support to accelerate deployment of shared solar projects nationwide. Representative Kathy Castor (D-FL) introduced a matching bill in the House, emphasizing that many Americans are locked out of rooftop solar due to renting, living in multi-family buildings, or upfront costs. The legislation seeks to break down these barriers by enabling more Americans to benefit from clean energy, save on electric bills, and create good-paying clean energy jobs. While the bill does not reinvent the community solar model,

    energyclean-energysolar-powercommunity-solarrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-legislation
  • Global Offshore Wind Market Sails Away From US

    The global offshore wind market is poised for another strong year in 2025, with 8 gigawatts of new capacity added in 2024, marking the fourth-highest annual installation on record. The total installed offshore wind capacity now powers approximately 73 million households worldwide. Additionally, offshore wind farms under construction reached a record 48 gigawatts, and governments globally set a new record for offshore lease auctions at 56 gigawatts. However, despite this robust pipeline, the industry faces significant challenges, particularly due to policy instability and supply chain constraints. The United States, despite its vast offshore wind potential—estimated by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 4 terawatts combining fixed-bottom and floating turbines—has notably lagged, dragging down the global market’s short-term outlook. The Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) highlights that the US’s negative policy environment, alongside failed auctions in the UK and Denmark, has led to a 24% downgrade in the short-term growth forecast

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-policyglobal-energy-marketwind-turbines
  • NREL Welcomes 30 Participants To Join Energy to Communities Peer-Learning Cohorts on Utility Engagement and Load Growth - CleanTechnica

    The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), has selected 30 local leaders from 25 states, territories, and Tribes to participate in two new Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohorts. These cohorts, running from July to December 2025, will convene monthly to address critical energy challenges related to electricity load growth and utility engagement. One cohort focuses on "Navigating Electricity Load Growth and Associated Utility Grid Impacts," aiming to help communities adapt to rising electricity demand driven by emerging industries like AI and data centers, while maintaining grid reliability and resilience. The other cohort, "Engaging With Electric Utilities for Successful Local Partnerships," will provide participants with knowledge about electric utility regulation, business models, and collaborative strategies to foster innovation and support local energy needs. These cohorts build on E2C’s existing work, which has engaged over 200 communities through educational resources, case studies, tools, and facilitated collaboration. The

    energyelectricity-load-growthutility-engagementgrid-infrastructurerenewable-energyenergy-policycommunity-energy-programs
  • New York to build first nuclear plant in decades to power factories

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced plans to build the state’s first new nuclear power plant in nearly four decades, aiming to develop a zero-emission facility with at least 1 gigawatt (GW) capacity. The New York Power Authority (NYPA), in coordination with the Department of Public Service (DPS), will immediately begin evaluating technologies, business models, and potential sites for the plant, focusing on factors such as public safety, community support, infrastructure compatibility, skilled labor availability, and financing options. This initiative supports New York’s broader goals of electrifying its economy, retiring fossil fuel plants, and attracting manufacturing jobs, while ensuring a reliable, affordable, and clean energy grid. Currently, New York’s existing nuclear capacity of 3.4 GW—generated by three plants operated by Constellation on Lake Ontario—provides about 20% of the state’s electricity and 42% of its carbon-free power. The new plant would increase total nuclear capacity to approximately

    energynuclear-powerclean-energypower-gridNew-Yorkzero-emissionenergy-policy
  • Bill C-5 has potential to accelerate a stronger, future-ready Canada, but only if we get the details right - Clean Energy Canada

    Bill C-5, recently passed by the House of Commons, aims to accelerate Canada’s clean economy by enabling the government to fast-track projects that contribute to national interests, including clean growth and climate objectives. Rachel Doran, executive director of Clean Energy Canada, supports the bill’s inclusion of climate goals as a factor in project approval and the removal of federal barriers to interprovincial trade and labour mobility. She highlights the potential for the bill to enhance energy security by expediting transmission projects and prioritizing skilled workers essential to clean economy sectors, such as EV mechanics and wind turbine technicians. However, Doran emphasizes the need for certain improvements to ensure the bill’s effectiveness. She argues that contributing to Canada’s climate goals should be a mandatory criterion rather than one of many considerations. Additionally, she recommends limiting the extraordinary powers granted by the bill to a shorter timeframe, such as three years, to maintain oversight. The bill’s implementation must also align with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

    energyclean-energyenergy-transitionclimate-changeclean-economyrenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • New York State wants more nuclear power in a big way

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced plans for the state to develop a large new nuclear power facility designed to generate at least 1 gigawatt of electricity. Emphasizing the importance of nuclear energy in reducing fossil fuel dependence, Hochul directed the New York Power Authority (NYPA) to spearhead the project, though specific site and design choices remain undecided. The state intends to collaborate with private partners for development, finance construction, and purchase the plant’s output. Potential locations include existing nuclear plants in upstate New York. This initiative aligns with a broader trend of tech companies like Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon investing in nuclear power to secure clean energy for their operations. Despite renewed interest, the nuclear industry faces significant challenges, including the absence of new nuclear plant construction in the U.S. for over 15 years and historical issues with cost overruns and delays. Hochul highlighted the need for federal regulatory and permitting reforms to expedite project timelines, noting that current barriers reside primarily in Washington

    energynuclear-powerrenewable-energypower-plantsclean-energyenergy-policysmall-modular-reactors
  • Ember Claims Battery Storage And Solar Can (Almost) Do It All - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights a recent Ember report that emphasizes the growing capability and cost-effectiveness of combining solar power with battery storage to provide nearly continuous electricity supply. In the sunniest regions, such as Las Vegas, pairing 5 kW of solar panels with a 17 kWh battery can deliver a stable 1 kW of power 24/7 throughout the year, covering about 97% of constant electricity needs cost-effectively. While this example is based on a modest power demand, the key takeaway is that the levelized cost of solar-plus-storage electricity has become the lowest among energy sources, making solar increasingly dispatchable and reliable beyond daylight hours. This development marks a significant shift in the energy landscape, enabling solar power to support continuous power contracts for industries requiring 24/7 electricity, especially in emerging economies and remote areas lacking grid infrastructure. Solar-plus-storage can also reduce grid expansion costs by maximizing existing grid connections and deferring upgrades. With battery storage capacity in the US

    energysolar-powerbattery-storageclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-energy-storage
  • There Could Be A Huge Surge In US EV Sales In Rest Of 2025, And Then Big Crash - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses a proposed Republican plan to eliminate key U.S. electric vehicle (EV) tax incentives, which could significantly impact the EV market starting in 2026. Specifically, the $7,500 tax credit for new EVs would end 180 days after the budget bill's passage, the tax credit for leased EVs produced outside the U.S. would be removed immediately, and the $4,000 tax credit for used EVs would expire 90 days after the bill is signed. This removal of incentives is expected to cause a sharp decline in EV sales after an initial surge in late 2025, as consumers rush to buy EVs before the credits disappear, followed by a steep market crash due to reduced demand. The article highlights that this policy shift will not only disrupt sales but also undermine long-term business confidence and investment in the U.S. EV and solar sectors. The unpredictability of incentives creates challenges for manufacturers who rely on stable, long-term planning and capital investment. Consequently

    electric-vehiclesEV-tax-creditUS-EV-marketrenewable-energysolar-energyelectric-car-salesenergy-policy
  • US fast-tracks nuclear reactor testing to catch up with China’s boom

    The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has launched a pilot program to accelerate the testing and commercial licensing of advanced nuclear reactors, aiming to catch up with China’s rapid nuclear energy expansion. This initiative, authorized under President Donald Trump’s executive order on reforming nuclear reactor testing, allows private companies to construct and operate test reactors outside national laboratories. The program seeks to streamline development by requiring applicants to demonstrate technological readiness, financial viability, and a plan to achieve reactor criticality by July 4, 2026. Selected companies will bear all costs related to design, construction, operation, and decommissioning, with applications due by July 21, 2025. This move is part of a broader effort to boost American innovation in nuclear technology, enhance economic growth, and strengthen national security. It builds on existing DOE and Department of Defense projects involving microreactors and advanced reactor demonstrations. The urgency stems from China’s aggressive nuclear expansion, which includes 102 reactors operating, under construction, or approved

    energynuclear-energyadvanced-reactorsDOEnuclear-reactor-testingenergy-policyclean-energy
  • Big Oil Has A Plan - Waste As Much Energy As Possible - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses recent actions by the U.S. government, specifically the elimination and de-prioritization of the Energy Star program by the EPA under the Trump administration. Energy Star, a bipartisan initiative started by Republicans, has been highly effective in saving consumers money—$14 billion in 2024 alone—and significantly reducing carbon emissions since 1992. The program’s termination is seen as a deliberate move to slow the transition to renewable energy and prolong fossil fuel dependence, benefiting incumbent energy producers like Big Oil. Environmentalist Bill McKibben highlights that such policies appear designed to waste energy, aligning with fossil fuel industry interests that historically favor energy inefficiency to maintain market dominance. The article also contrasts this approach with the preferences of businesses globally, where 97% reportedly favor switching to renewable energy due to its efficiency, cost stability, and reduced geopolitical risks. McKibben criticizes the U.S. government’s contradictory stance, citing a Department of Energy goal to increase fossil fuel exports and foreign

    energyfossil-fuelsrenewable-energyEnergy-Star-programemissions-reductionenergy-policyclimate-change
  • State vs. Local Control Over Energy Siting Sparks Debate In Pennsylvania - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the longstanding controversy over who should control the siting of new electrical generating facilities, focusing on recent debates in Pennsylvania. Historically, energy siting decisions have been contentious due to the trade-offs between proximity to demand centers and local community impacts, especially with thermal plants and now renewable projects like solar farms and wind turbines. Local communities, particularly in rural areas, often oppose such developments due to concerns about aesthetics and quality of life, fueling political tensions between rural and urban interests. In Pennsylvania, lawmakers are considering establishing a state-level board called the Reliable Energy Siting and Electric Transition Board (RESET) to centralize authority over energy siting decisions, replacing the current patchwork of local regulations. Proponents argue that localities lack the expertise to handle complex, costly energy projects and that local opposition causes delays and increased costs. However, opponents fear the board could favor thermal generation projects, increasing carbon and methane emissions contrary to climate goals. Clean energy advocates emphasize the need to streamline approvals for renewable projects,

    energyenergy-sitingrenewable-energypower-generationenergy-policysolar-farmswind-turbines
  • Senate GOP bill spares nuclear and geothermal energy while hammering wind and solar

    Senate Republicans have introduced a budget reconciliation bill that significantly scales back renewable energy incentives established under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), particularly targeting solar, wind, and hydrogen energy. The bill proposes ending residential solar tax credits within 180 days of enactment and disqualifying solar leasing companies from receiving credits, which would severely impact the residential solar market. Commercial wind and solar projects would face a shortened timeline for tax credits, with full credits only available for projects starting within six months of the bill’s signing and phased reductions thereafter, disappearing entirely after 2027. Hydrogen tax credits would also end this year, creating additional challenges for hydrogen startups. In contrast, the bill largely spares geothermal, nuclear, hydropower, and long-duration energy storage technologies, with only slight extensions to their tax credit phase-outs. Carbon capture incentives would be modified to eliminate distinctions based on the use of captured carbon, making all projects eligible for the same credit level. Notably, the inclusion of long-duration energy storage could

    energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-energynuclear-energygeothermal-energyenergy-policy
  • The Unbelievably Big Bad Bill Hurts IRA Incentives And Red States - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the significant negative impact of the proposed "One BIG Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA) on the clean energy incentives established by the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The OBBBA, supported by former President Trump and the House Ways and Means Committee, aims to end tax credits for cleaner vehicles by 2025 and gradually eliminate incentives for wind, solar, and nuclear energy projects by 2032. This rollback threatens to derail the rapid growth of clean energy in the U.S., which saw a 47% increase in capacity in 2024, with solar and battery technologies leading the expansion. The article highlights that clean energy investments have created over 240,000 manufacturing jobs, with 78% of spending benefiting Republican-held suburban and rural districts. The rollback is linked to the Trump administration’s preferential treatment of oil and gas exploration and its suspension of clean energy development on federal lands. Since January, businesses have canceled or delayed more than $20 billion in clean energy

    energyclean-energyrenewable-energyelectric-vehiclessolar-powerbattery-manufacturingenergy-policy
  • Republican Budget Bill to Raise People's Energy Prices - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses the potential negative impacts of a Republican budget bill that aims to repeal clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act. According to a report by NERA Economic Consulting, commissioned by the Clean Buyers Energy Association, removing these technology-neutral tax incentives—such as the §45Y production tax credit and §48E investment tax credit—would lead to higher energy prices across 19 states. The analysis highlights that without these credits, energy systems would rely more heavily on traditional, costlier energy sources, resulting in significant electricity price increases, with seven states facing double-digit percentage hikes between 2026 and 2032. The broader economic consequences of repealing clean energy tax credits are severe. The report warns that inflated energy costs would suppress commercial and industrial activity, reduce labor and capital demand, and cause wage losses and declining household incomes. This combination would constrain consumer spending and economic resilience, leading to shrinking economies, increased financial strain on households, and potential job losses in key

    energyclean-energytax-creditselectricity-priceseconomic-impactrenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Republicans in House Who Don't Want Clean Energy Tax Credits Cut Look to Senators to Save Them - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the political dynamics surrounding clean energy and electric vehicle tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Although these incentives disproportionately benefit districts represented by Republican lawmakers, many Republicans initially voted to cut these tax credits to align with party and oil and gas industry interests. However, 13 Republican House members from vulnerable districts, led by Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA), have recently expressed strong concerns about provisions that would phase down these incentives and impose strict new supply chain requirements, warning that such measures could threaten billions in investments and thousands of jobs. These lawmakers have appealed to Senate leaders, urging them to restore the tax credits in the final bill to support U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers, emphasizing the need for a "pro-energy growth" approach that balances taxpayer protection with economic opportunity. Notably, while tax credits for renewables face cuts, incentives for nuclear power and biofuels remain intact, reflecting political preferences that may not align with maximizing competitiveness against

    energyclean-energytax-creditsrenewable-energyInflation-Reduction-Actenergy-policyenergy-investment
  • Alberta's Renewable Energy Sabotage: Time For Federal Intervention - CleanTechnica

    The article highlights Alberta’s newly introduced reclamation security requirements for renewable energy projects, set to take effect by May 31, 2025, which are described as unprecedentedly severe and punitive. Developers must post securities equal to 30% of anticipated decommissioning costs at project start, increasing to 60% after 15 years, with these rules applied retroactively to existing projects by 2027. The exclusion of salvage value from these calculations inflates financial burdens well beyond international norms, making Alberta’s requirements the highest globally. This regulatory shift contrasts sharply with Alberta’s historically lax reclamation policies for fossil fuel industries, which have accumulated tens of billions in unfunded cleanup liabilities with minimal upfront financial assurances, effectively shifting cleanup costs to taxpayers. The article argues that this move represents a politically motivated, ideologically driven attack on the renewable energy sector, undermining investor confidence by breaking contractual norms through retroactive application of harsh financial obligations. Such instability threatens to halt billions in investments and push companies to relocate

    energyrenewable-energyAlbertaenergy-policyenvironmental-regulationfossil-fuelsinvestment-risks
  • 3 Ridiculous Things About Donald Trump Forcing A Coal Power Plant To Stay Open - CleanTechnica

    The article by Steve Hanley criticizes the Trump administration, specifically the Department of Energy led by a fossil fuel billionaire, for forcing a Michigan utility company to keep an outdated and polluting coal power plant operational despite having a newer natural gas plant built to replace it. This mandate is described as absurd and counterproductive, especially given the administration’s contradictory stance on climate change: denying global warming publicly while invoking emergency powers due to expected extreme heat to justify keeping the coal plant running. Hanley highlights this as a hypocritical and environmentally harmful approach that exacerbates global heating rather than addressing it responsibly. Additionally, the article points out the irony of a Republican-led government, which typically advocates for limited government intervention, imposing a heavy-handed federal order that disrupts market efficiency and forces Consumers Energy to maintain an uneconomical power source. This intervention leads to higher electricity costs for ratepayers across Michigan and 14 other states, with no prior consultation from state regulators or grid operators. The author condemns this as unnecessary government overreach that increases financial burdens on consumers while undermining clean energy progress, labeling the policy as “brilliant idiocy” for its counterproductive and costly consequences.

    energycoal-power-plantfossil-fuelselectricity-gridenergy-policyclimate-changeutility-costs
  • High Energy Bills? Blame A Republican! - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the impending rise in energy bills this summer, largely due to increasing natural gas prices and higher temperatures driving up air conditioning use. It emphasizes the role of the US solar industry as a sustainable solution to these challenges, but criticizes Republican lawmakers for advancing policies that threaten this progress. Specifically, the article points to a recently passed House budget bill—dubbed the “Big Beautiful Bill” by Trump and House Republicans—that includes provisions undermining domestic solar manufacturing and installation, particularly harming states that supported Trump in the 2024 election. The piece details how the Biden administration had invested federal grants and loans into solar manufacturing facilities in Trump-voting states, aiming to create jobs and economic growth. However, the new budget bill threatens to eliminate these programs, which the Solar Market Insight report warns will disproportionately impact solar jobs and factories in these regions. With Republicans controlling both the House and Senate, the article argues that they hold the power—and responsibility—to reverse these damaging changes but are unlikely to do so. Instead, the article suggests that Republicans favor building more gas power plants, a less sustainable approach that could further exacerbate high energy costs. Overall, the article assigns significant blame to Republican congressional actions for the rising energy bills and job losses in the renewable energy sector, while acknowledging other factors also contribute to energy cost increases. It underscores the political dynamics at play, where Republican control of Congress and the administration’s policies are at odds, with the future of clean energy incentives and programs hanging in the balance.

    energysolar-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-billssolar-manufacturingUS-energy-industry
  • Energy Department Orders Michigan Coal Generating Station To Remain Open - CleanTechnica

    The U.S. Energy Department, led by Chris Wright, issued an emergency order mandating that the 63-year-old J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant in Michigan remain operational for at least 90 days, overriding a previously approved decommissioning plan set by the Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) in 2022. The plant was scheduled to close as part of a transition plan that included replacing its capacity with a methane-fired power plant already purchased by Consumers Energy, the utility owner. Wright justified the order by citing concerns over potential electricity shortages in the Midwest during the summer due to insufficient baseload power from coal, gas, and nuclear plants. However, the Michigan PSC and the utility company stated they neither requested nor were consulted about the emergency order, highlighting a lack of coordination and transparency. The decision has drawn criticism for bypassing the usual regulatory process, which typically involves public comment and agency review, and for imposing significant financial burdens on consumers. Dan Scripps, chair of the Michigan PSC, estimated that keeping the coal plant running could cost ratepayers across 15 states tens of millions of dollars, potentially nearing $100 million. The Energy Department defended the order by referencing longstanding warnings from grid operators about the risks of decommissioning baseload power sources but did not provide evidence of a cost-benefit analysis or acknowledge the existing replacement plan. Emergency orders of this nature are described as highly unusual, underscoring the controversial and unprecedented nature of this intervention.

    energycoal-powerenergy-policypower-gridelectricity-generationfossil-fuelsenergy-department
  • Why Clean Equals Competitive When Building Canada’s Trade Alliances Beyond the US - Clean Energy Canada

    The article from Clean Energy Canada highlights the urgent need for Canada to diversify its trade alliances beyond the United States in response to deteriorating trust and unpredictable trade policies under the Trump administration. Canada is well-positioned to pivot towards global markets, as it holds trade agreements covering 60% of the global economy. Importantly, Canada’s top non-US trade partners have committed to net-zero emissions, implemented carbon pricing, and are adopting carbon border adjustments and electric vehicle (EV) requirements. These policies signal a global shift away from fossil fuels toward clean energy, creating growing demand for low-carbon products and technologies. Canada’s competitive advantage lies in its abundant clean energy resources, low electricity costs, and rich deposits of critical minerals essential for clean technology, such as cobalt, lithium, nickel, and copper. The country’s renewable energy capacity has expanded significantly and continues to attract substantial investment, with Indigenous partnerships playing a key role. The global market for clean energy technologies is projected to nearly triple by 2035, offering Canada an opportunity to grow its clean economy, support domestic demand, and increase exports. To capitalize on this, the article recommends a coordinated industrial policy focused on industries that align with net-zero goals, trade diversification, and building domestic clean supply chains using Canadian resources and expertise. In summary, Canada’s future economic competitiveness hinges on embracing clean energy and leveraging its natural and technological assets to meet the evolving demands of global trade partners committed to sustainability. This strategic shift will help Canada reduce reliance on the US market, enhance energy security, and position the country as a leader in the global clean economy.

    clean-energyrenewable-energycarbon-pricingelectric-vehiclesclean-technologyenergy-policylow-carbon-economy
  • Transforming Canada: Mapping A 100% Electrified Energy Economy - CleanTechnica

    The article "Transforming Canada: Mapping A 100% Electrified Energy Economy" explores Canada’s critical juncture in transitioning its energy system toward full electrification and renewable integration. Drawing on the author's experience with Ireland’s 2050 energy roadmap and collaboration with Canadian energy leaders, the piece highlights the opportunity for Canada to adopt a similarly ambitious, clean, secure, and affordable energy framework. Despite differences in scale, Canada and Ireland share challenges like decarbonization, energy independence, and affordability. Canada’s abundant renewable resources and technological capacity position it well for this transformation. Currently, Canada’s energy system is heavily reliant on fossil fuels, primarily oil and natural gas exports to the U.S. and increasingly Asia, which creates economic vulnerabilities amid global market and geopolitical uncertainties. Domestically, fossil fuels dominate heating, transportation, and industry, resulting in significant inefficiencies and energy waste—about 1,500 TWh of the roughly 2,500 TWh primary energy consumed annually is lost, mainly as waste heat from combustion processes. The author presents Sankey diagrams illustrating current energy flows and envisions a fully decarbonized, electrified Canadian energy economy. While the diagrams are preliminary, they underscore the scale of inefficiency in the current system and the potential gains from electrification and renewable integration. The article serves as an initial reflection and call to action for inclusive, forward-looking energy planning in Canada.

    energyrenewable-energyelectrificationdecarbonizationenergy-policyclean-energyenergy-transformation
  • Want to Claim the Solar Tax Credit? Get Installing Now

    energysolartax-creditphotovoltaicinstallationrenewable-energyenergy-policy
  • Repugnican Budget Bill Could Decimate US Solar Industry - CleanTechnica

    solar-energyrenewable-energysolar-industryenergy-policyclean-energymanufacturingenergy-incentives
  • SEIA: Solar & Storage Industry Statement on U.S. International Trade Commission Injury Determination - CleanTechnica

    solar-energysolar-manufacturingclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-industryenergy-storage
  • Trump Loses Big Game Of Offshore Wind Chicken, Bigly

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyconstructionEquinorTrump-administrationenergy-policy
  • New Texas Bill Threatens Growth Of Wind & Solar Industry - CleanTechnica

    energyrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powergrid-reliabilityTexas-legislationenergy-policy
  • Solar & Storage Industry Statement on Proposed Reconciliation Legislation in U.S. House Committee Markups

    energysolar-powerclean-energyenergy-policyenergy-securityrenewable-energysolar-industry
  • Chuyên gia hạt nhân Dubna làm việc với Viện Năng lượng Nguyên tử Việt Nam

    energynuclear-energyVietnamcollaborationatomic-energysustainable-developmentenergy-policy
  • Kinh nghiệm quốc tế chuyển từ FIT sang đấu thầu và cơ chế khác cho năng lượng tái tạo Gợi ý với Việt Nam

    energyrenewable-energyFITauction-mechanismenergy-policyclimate-changeenergy-transition
  • Thủ tướng Phạm Minh Chính tiếp Chủ tịch Tập đoàn Hoa Điện Trung Quốc

    energyrenewable-energyclean-energyhydropowerenergy-storageenergy-policysustainable-development
  • Job posting: Policy Analyst

    clean-energyrenewable-energyclimate-actionenergy-policyclean-technologyenergy-transitionsustainability
  • 'Việt Nam tiến tới làm chủ công nghệ năng lượng hạt nhân'

    energynuclear-energygreen-energyenergy-technologyenergy-policyVietnam-energyatomic-energy
  • Thúc đẩy chuyển dịch năng lượng tái tạo Việt Nam chủ động tìm lời giải công nghệ và chính sách

    energyrenewable-energyVietnamenergy-policysustainable-developmentenergy-transitionclean-technology
  • Tình hình đàm phán giá năng lượng tái tạo chuyển tiếp cập nhật 14 5 2025

    energyrenewable-energyenergy-transitionpower-purchase-agreementsenergy-policyelectricity-marketenergy-projects
  • Tham khảo một số Luật Năng lượng Nguyên tử trên thế giới

    energynuclear-energyenergy-policyenergy-regulationclean-energyenergy-securityatomic-energy
  • Trump Should Be Held Accountable For Defunding Renewable Energy Projects

    renewable-energyclimate-changesolar-powerwind-energyenergy-policyclean-energygreenhouse-gas-emissions
  • Solar Power Has Surged in “Trump States” in 2020s

    energysolar-powerrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-capacityenergy-policyenergy-investment
  • Trao đổi của EVN về điều chỉnh giá điện tháng 5 2025 và các tác động đến từng nhóm khách hàng

    energyelectricity-pricingnuclear-energyEVNenergy-policyconsumer-impactenergy-regulation
  • Cơ chế cho nguồn điện sử dụng khí trong nước và LNG nhập khẩu Nghị định 100 2025

    energynatural-gaselectricity-generationrenewable-energypower-systemsenergy-policythermal-power
  • Quy định chi tiết về cơ chế cho các dự án điện sử dụng khí trong nước và LNG nhập khẩu

    energynatural-gaselectricity-generationrenewable-energyenergy-policythermal-powerenergy-regulation
  • Bàn về Dự thảo Luật Năng lượng Nguyên tử Việt Nam sửa đổi

    energynuclear-energyenergy-policyVietnamsafety-regulationsenergy-lawatomic-energy
  • Tầm nhìn chính sách năng lượng Việt Nam Tham khảo gợi ý của chuyên gia quốc tế

    energyrenewable-energyenergy-policysustainable-developmentVietnam-energynuclear-energyclimate-change
  • Những điểm mới quan trọng tại Dự thảo Luật Năng lượng nguyên tử sửa đổi

    energynuclear-energyenergy-policysafety-regulationssustainable-energyenergy-strategyatomic-energy
  • Phê duyệt khung giá phát điện cho loại hình nhà máy thủy điện tích năng năm 2025

    energyhydropowerelectricity-pricingrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-generationenergy-market
  • Kế hoạch giảm lệ thuộc nước ngoài về nhiên liệu hạt nhân của Hoa Kỳ

    energynuclear-energyuranium-enrichmentrenewable-energyenergy-supply-chainsustainable-developmentenergy-policy
  • Blue States Sue Feds Over Halt To Wind Energy Projects

    energywind-energyrenewable-energyclean-energyfederal-regulationsenergy-policyjob-creation
  • US Offshore Wind Industry Lives To Fight Another Day

    energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyclean-energyenergy-policywind-powerenergy-industry
  • Trump’s Policies Are Creating Uncertainty for Fossil Fuel Companies

    Trump-policiesfossil-fuel-industryenvironmental-regulationsproject-approvalenergy-policyuncertaintypipeline-development
  • Finland Could Be the First Country in the World to Bury Nuclear Waste Permanently

    nuclear-wasteFinlandpermanent-disposalnuclear-powerspent-fuelenergy-policyenvironmental-sustainability