Articles tagged with "energy-policy"
Tesla's Mission Has Been Completely Assaulted By Current US Policy - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica discusses how Tesla’s original mission—to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and sustainable energy—has been severely undermined by current U.S. policies, particularly under the Trump administration. Initially, Tesla aimed to push the auto industry toward electrification and later expanded its mission to include solar energy after acquiring SolarCity. However, political shifts and Elon Musk’s involvement in supporting Donald Trump, whose administration and Republican allies have largely opposed renewable energy initiatives, have coincided with a significant rollback of clean energy progress in the U.S. The article highlights numerous setbacks: automakers have scaled back EV production plans; major solar projects like Esmeralda 7 have been stalled by regulatory red tape; offshore wind projects have been delayed despite prior approvals and investments; and the U.S. government has retreated from clean energy and climate goals. These actions contrast sharply with the administration’s support for fossil fuel industries, which face fewer regulatory hurdles. The cumulative effect is described as a
energyrenewable-energyelectric-vehiclesTeslasolar-powerclean-technologyenergy-policyRenewables In America Will Continue To Rise Despite The Loss Of Incentives - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights that despite the Biden administration’s recent cancellation of wind and solar projects and the impending expiration of federal tax incentives on July 1, 2026, renewable energy development in the U.S. will continue to grow significantly over the next two years. This surge is driven by a large pipeline of projects already underway, with developers rushing to "start" projects before the deadline to qualify for tax credits. The definition of "started" remains unclear and will be determined by the IRS, creating uncertainty. Large companies are front-loading investments, such as ordering expensive equipment early, to meet the criteria, while smaller developers may sell projects to better-funded firms. Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm confirmed this rush, predicting a spike in renewable capacity additions followed by a decline unless political control shifts in Congress. The momentum behind renewables is fueled not only by subsidies but also by strong market demand and the relative speed and cost-effectiveness of solar and battery installations compared to natural gas or nuclear plants
energyrenewable-energysolar-powerbatteriesenergy-policyclean-energyUS-energy-marketAnti-Solar Actions In USA Are Restricting Energy Supply; Right When The Grid Can Least Afford It - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights how the Trump Administration's policies are significantly restricting the growth of solar energy in the United States at a critical time when electricity demand is surging. Despite solar energy being the fastest-growing source of new generation capacity—adding more new capacity in 2024 than any other technology in two decades—the administration has implemented a series of measures that undermine this progress. These include changes to tax policy (notably HR 1), cancellation of key grid improvements and solar grants by the Department of Energy, bureaucratic delays and cancellations of large solar projects by the Department of the Interior, and upcoming guidance that could further restrict financing. These actions have slowed solar deployment, created investor uncertainty, caused job losses, and led to project cancellations. The consequences of these anti-solar policies are stark. Forecasts from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie show that new solar capacity additions could decline by 27% from 2026 to 2030, translating to
energysolar-energyclean-energyenergy-policyelectricity-gridrenewable-energyenergy-regulationLocal Florida Governments Sue DeSantis Over Laws That Block Climate Action - CleanTechnica
The article discusses a significant legal battle unfolding in Florida, where 25 local governments, including Manatee County, have sued Governor Ron DeSantis and his administration over the recently enacted SB 180 law. This legislation, effective July 1, 2024, restricts local governments from implementing climate resilience and sustainability measures in their planning and zoning regulations. The law freezes local land development policies retroactively to August 2024 and prohibits any local restrictions that are “more restrictive or burdensome” than state standards. It also blocks state support for renewable energy initiatives, bans offshore wind turbine construction in state waters, and limits local authority over fuel use in appliances. These measures undermine local efforts to address climate change and disaster resilience, particularly in vulnerable coastal areas. Manatee County’s proposed comprehensive plan amendments, which included protecting wetlands by restricting development near marshes and controlling urban sprawl, were deemed violations of SB 180. The county faces threats of funding cuts and removal of officials for pursuing these climate-focused
energyclimate-changerenewable-energyoffshore-wind-turbinesenergy-policysustainabilitydisaster-resilienceNevada’s Lost Sunlight: What Esmeralda 7 Tells Us About America’s Energy Future - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the quiet cancellation of Esmeralda 7, a massive 6.2 GW solar and battery project in Nevada, following a subtle change by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Esmeralda 7, backed by major developers like NextEra and Invenergy, was poised to supply clean energy to millions and had progressed through significant environmental reviews. However, under Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the Trump administration replaced the decade-old renewable development framework with more restrictive policies that fragmented project approvals, increased political oversight, and imposed new barriers such as a “capacity density” test and higher land leasing fees. These changes disrupted the shared environmental and permitting processes essential for Esmeralda 7’s economic viability, effectively dooming the project. This policy shift reflects a broader trend within the Interior Department favoring oil and gas extraction over large-scale renewable projects on public lands, despite rhetoric promoting “energy abundance.” The cancellation of Esmeralda 7 has significant implications for Nevada’s energy future,
energyrenewable-energysolar-powerbattery-storageclean-energy-projectsenergy-policyUnited-States-energyThe Economics Of Renewables — The Bottom Line Is Often Hidden By Hyperbole - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica addresses the widespread misinformation and political opposition surrounding renewable energy, particularly from right-wing governments and fossil fuel interests. Critics often rely on outdated data or political motivations to claim that renewables are too expensive compared to fossil fuels, despite evidence to the contrary. The piece highlights former President Trump’s vocal anti-renewables stance, including efforts to dismantle renewable subsidies and infrastructure, which contrasts with data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) showing a more balanced and reliable energy mix. It also notes that clean energy investments offer better long-term returns, as renewable hardware generates electricity over decades, unlike fossil fuels which are consumed immediately. The article further counters common myths about renewable energy reliability, citing advances in battery storage technology that allow surplus solar power to be stored and used when needed, enhancing grid stability. This progress is not limited to the U.S.; for example, in France, serious economic analyses have debunked exaggerated cost claims about renewable development, showing more reasonable
energyrenewable-energyclean-energyenergy-policyfossil-fuelsenergy-subsidiesenergy-transitionThe Automakers That Completely Dropped The Ball On End Of US EV Tax Credit - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights a notable disparity in U.S. electric vehicle (EV) sales growth among automakers in the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. While some companies experienced significant EV sales increases, several major automakers saw declines, indicating missed opportunities amid favorable market conditions and the end of the U.S. EV tax credit. Specifically, models like the Acura ZDX, BMW iX, Lexus RZ, Nissan EV lineup (ARIYA and LEAF), Subaru Solterra, and Toyota BZ4X all reported year-over-year sales drops ranging from about 7.5% to as much as 61%. The article criticizes these automakers for failing to capitalize on the growing EV market and the momentum generated by positive industry headlines. It suggests that despite overall market growth, these companies either lacked effective strategies or execution to maintain or grow their EV sales during this critical period. The piece also notes that some companies have yet to report
electric-vehiclesEV-tax-creditautomotive-industryelectric-mobilityrenewable-energyclean-technologyenergy-policyWhy US Power Bills Are Surging
The article explains the recent surge in U.S. electricity bills, which have risen by more than 30 percent on average since 2020, causing widespread financial strain for consumers and economic disruption across multiple sectors. Several factors contribute to this increase, including rising electricity demand, volatile fuel prices, inflation, tariffs, delays in building new transmission lines, and slow additions of new power generators. These combined pressures suggest that high electricity prices may persist for the foreseeable future. The impact is particularly severe on lower- and moderate-income households, many of whom are already struggling to pay bills and face increasing risks of power shutoffs. Despite the current spike in electricity costs, the article provides broader context by highlighting that overall household energy spending—covering electricity, natural gas, and gasoline—has remained relatively stable since 2000 when adjusted for inflation. This stability is partly due to a growing trend of electrification in homes, such as switching from gas furnaces to heat pumps and from gasoline vehicles to electric motors,
energyelectricity-pricespower-billsenergy-policyenergy-crisisutility-rateselectricity-demandDepartment of Energy cancels $7.5B of clean energy projects in mostly blue states
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the cancellation of 321 clean energy awards totaling approximately $7.56 billion. These cuts predominantly affected projects in states that supported Kamala Harris in the last presidential election, many of which are governed by Democrats, though some projects in Republican-leaning states were also canceled. Notably, significant funding was withdrawn from California’s $1.2 billion hydrogen hub project and at least 10 direct air capture (DAC) projects worth $47.3 million, although some DAC projects in Alaska, Kentucky, Louisiana, and North Dakota remain intact. The canceled awards spanned various DOE offices, including Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy and Clean Energy Demonstrations, with 26% of the awards having been granted between Election Day and Inauguration Day. These cancellations reflect the Trump administration’s broader effort to slow the transition away from fossil fuels, as evidenced by previous DOE and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contract cancellations totaling billions of dollars. Many affected
energyclean-energyDepartment-of-Energyhydrogen-hubdirect-air-capturerenewable-energyenergy-policyDepartment of Energy cancels $7.5B of clean energy projects in Harris-voting states
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the cancellation of 321 clean energy awards totaling $7.56 billion, affecting projects primarily in 16 states that all voted for Kamala Harris in the last presidential election. Among the canceled initiatives was California’s $1.2 billion hydrogen hub project, the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems. Other impacted states include Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. These awards were originally granted across various DOE offices focused on advanced energy research, clean energy demonstrations, energy efficiency, fossil energy, grid deployment, and manufacturing supply chains. Notably, 26% of these awards were issued between Election Day and Inauguration Day, a period during which presidential authority remains active. The cancellations reflect the Trump administration’s broader effort to slow the transition away from fossil fuels, following previous DOE and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
energyclean-energyDepartment-of-Energyrenewable-energyhydrogen-hubenergy-projectsenergy-policySigns Of A Renewable Energy Comeback Appear In The US
The article highlights emerging signs of a renewable energy resurgence in the United States despite federal policy setbacks under President Donald Trump's administration. While the current administration has imposed restrictions on wind energy development, including halting offshore wind leases and attempting to stop ongoing projects, some wind initiatives continue progressing. Notably, Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission recently approved a new 118-megawatt wind farm, signaling a potential shift in state-level energy policy. Offshore wind projects in New York, Massachusetts, and Virginia are also advancing despite federal challenges, with Virginia’s Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project notably avoiding interference. Texas remains a hub for renewable energy innovation, expanding beyond wind and solar into renewable natural gas (RNG) and hydrogen technologies. The University of Texas at Austin’s Hydrogen ProtoHub facility is fostering research and development of clean energy systems, including hydrogen production from sunlight and water. Collaborations with organizations like GTI Energy are exploring repurposing natural gas infrastructure for RNG and synthetic natural gas applications. Additionally
renewable-energywind-energyoffshore-windenergy-policyclean-energyhydrogen-energyrenewable-natural-gasUS Government Shills For Big Coal - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica criticizes recent U.S. government actions that favor the coal industry despite environmental and economic concerns. The Interior Department plans to open 13.1 million acres of federal land for coal mining and reduce royalty rates for coal companies. The Energy Department is allocating $625 million to upgrade coal plants to extend their operational life, while the EPA intends to repeal numerous Biden-era regulations aimed at limiting coal plant emissions of carbon dioxide, mercury, and other pollutants. These moves are framed as efforts to maintain coal’s role in the U.S. energy mix, even though coal is a major contributor to climate change and often more expensive than alternatives like natural gas or solar power. The article also highlights the growing electricity demand driven by massive data centers supporting artificial intelligence advancements, such as Meta’s planned data center larger than Manhattan. This surge in demand has led to significant utility bill increases for residents near data centers, with some areas experiencing up to a 267% rise in electricity costs over five years
energycoal-miningelectricity-generationdata-centersartificial-intelligenceenergy-policyenvironmental-regulationTrump’s Energy Department forbids staff from saying ‘climate change’ or ‘green’
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), under a Trump administration appointee, has issued a directive banning staff from using a list of words and phrases related to climate and renewable energy, including “climate change,” “green,” “decarbonization,” “energy transition,” “sustainability,” and “carbon footprint.” This memo, sent to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), reflects the administration’s stance against framing energy policies in terms of environmental sustainability or emissions reduction. The ban extends even to terms like “emissions,” despite their neutral scientific meaning and legal recognition by the U.S. Supreme Court as air pollutants subject to regulation. The EERE, created in response to the 1973 energy crisis to promote renewable energy and energy efficiency, faces a shift in priorities under Trump, who favors expanding fossil fuel use and dismisses renewable energy efforts as a “green energy scam.” Trump’s rhetoric, including a recent UN speech criticizing countries investing in solar, wind
energyrenewable-energyenergy-efficiencyclimate-changegreen-energyenergy-policysustainable-energyKing Trump The Fool Railed At The UNiverse, While Clean Energy Stood Waiting In The Wings - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica critically examines former President Donald Trump’s address at the United Nations General Assembly on September 23, where he vehemently opposed the global green energy agenda. Trump extended his speech well beyond the allotted time, using the platform to attack renewable energy initiatives and climate science, labeling climate change concerns as falsehoods propagated by “stupid people.” His rhetoric was described as egotistical, regressive, and damaging, especially given the global consensus on the urgency of climate action. The article portrays Trump’s behavior as immature and counterproductive, highlighting how his stance isolates the U.S. from international climate collaboration and undermines progress on clean energy. In contrast, the article underscores the growing momentum of renewable energy worldwide, citing data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) and BloombergNEF that emphasize the economic and environmental benefits of wind and solar power. Despite Trump’s dismissive comments about large-scale renewable projects, the U.S. has seen significant growth in solar and wind
energyclean-energyrenewable-energyclimate-changeUN-climate-summitgreenhouse-gas-emissionsenergy-policyEnding The Solar Tax Credit May Have Hidden Benefits - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the impending expiration of the 30 percent federal tax credit for residential solar installations at the end of 2025 and explores the counterintuitive argument that ending this subsidy may actually benefit the solar industry. While the tax credit has supported growth, some industry insiders argue that rooftop solar is now a mature technology that should no longer rely on subsidies. They point out that the U.S. solar market suffers from disproportionately high "soft costs"—including installation, permitting, sales, marketing, and financing—that make residential solar two to three times more expensive than in countries like Australia. These inflated costs are partly perpetuated by subsidies, which obscure inefficiencies and enable excessive dealer fees and sales commissions. Experts cited in the article suggest that eliminating the tax credit could pressure the industry to streamline operations, reduce costs, and eliminate bad practices, ultimately leading to a more efficient and affordable solar market. However, the transition may cause short-term challenges such as slower adoption and financial strain on some companies. A
energysolar-energysolar-tax-creditrenewable-energyresidential-solarenergy-policyclean-energy704-MW Offshore Wind Project Back On Track As Judge Slams Trump Admin - CleanTechnica
The 704-megawatt Revolution Wind offshore project off Rhode Island, developed by Danish company Ørsted, has resumed after a federal judge ruled against the Trump administration’s stop-work order. The project, which had nearly completed foundation installation and turbine placement, was halted by former Interior Secretary Doug Burgum citing vague national security concerns despite extensive prior reviews under multiple administrations confirming its safety and compliance. Ørsted successfully sued to overturn the halt, highlighting that the project supports hundreds of jobs and aligns with the Energy Department’s goals for increased power generation capacity. The article criticizes the Trump administration’s broader stance on offshore wind, noting that it blocked new leases and used legal and administrative measures to impede approved projects and related infrastructure upgrades. This opposition contrasts with the Biden administration’s support, under which 11 new offshore wind farms have entered the pipeline. The Energy Department’s recent initiative to boost power generation notably excludes wind and solar, favoring traditional “reliable” energy sources like coal, natural gas,
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-policyclean-energypower-generationCalifornia Passes Legislation to Support Solar & Lower Energy Costs - CleanTechnica
California has recently passed two significant pieces of legislation—Assembly Bill 825 and Senate Bill 302—aimed at advancing solar energy development and creating a more integrated clean energy grid in the Western United States. AB 825 initiates the establishment of a regional electricity partnership across Western states, a move long advocated by renewable energy supporters, which is expected to enhance energy production efficiency, grid reliability, and ultimately reduce electricity costs for Californians. Senate Bill 302 aligns California’s tax code with the federal Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) by exempting solar developers from state taxes on federal renewable energy tax benefits, a step that brings California in line with most other states and helps lower project costs. These legislative efforts come amid ongoing challenges from federal policies that have hindered solar development and increased energy prices. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) praised the bills, emphasizing their potential to expand market access for California’s solar and storage resources and to ensure that energy developers can fully benefit from federal incentives. Governor
energysolar-energyclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-legislationCalifornia-energyYoung Environmentalists Sue Over Executive Orders That Benefit Fossil Fuels - CleanTechnica
A group of young environmentalists, previously successful in suing the state of Montana for violating its constitutional guarantee of a safe and clean environment, have now joined forces with other youth activists to sue the federal government. They seek to block several presidential executive orders issued this year that promote fossil fuel production under the guise of a national energy emergency. The lawsuit, supported by the nonprofit legal organization Our Children’s Trust, argues that these executive orders are unlawful and violate the state-created danger doctrine, which prohibits government actions that harm citizens. The case, heard in a federal courtroom in Missoula, Montana, marks the first time a youth-led constitutional climate lawsuit has included live testimony at the federal level. Plaintiffs and expert witnesses, including prominent academics and former White House advisor John Podesta, testified that the executive orders will exacerbate the climate crisis and jeopardize the health and future of young people and their communities. The federal government, however, did not present any witnesses and has moved to dismiss the case, following a
energyfossil-fuelsclimate-changeenvironmental-lawrenewable-energyenergy-policylegal-activismCapitalism at a Crossroads: Profit & Public Purpose in Clean Energy - CleanTechnica
The article discusses Brett Christophers’ analysis of the challenges facing the clean energy transition, as presented in his book. Despite renewable energy often being cheaper to produce than fossil fuels, investment levels remain insufficient to meet climate goals. Christophers attributes this to the profit-driven nature of private capital, which finds renewables less attractive due to their low marginal costs and resulting thin profit margins. In contrast, fossil fuels maintain profitability through controlled scarcity and market structures favoring incumbents. Consequently, relying solely on private investment will not accelerate the transition fast enough, and the state must play a much larger role by owning infrastructure or guaranteeing returns through subsidies and long-term contracts. Christophers argues that electricity should be treated as a public good, better managed through planned, coordinated investment rather than volatile spot markets. He calls for a significant expansion of public ownership and leadership in renewable energy, effectively socializing electrical generation to bypass profit motives that hinder progress. However, critics note that the situation is more nuanced: renewable profitability varies by
energyrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-powerwind-energyenergy-investmentenergy-policyA Huge Floating Offshore Wind Opportunity Floats Away
The article discusses the significant setbacks faced by the U.S. offshore wind industry under the Trump administration, particularly during his second term. Offshore wind, especially floating offshore wind technology, represents a major opportunity for the U.S. given its extensive coastal resources, including shallow Atlantic waters suitable for monopile turbines and deeper waters along the Pacific coast ideal for floating platforms. These floating platforms offer advantages such as avoiding conflicts with fishing, shipping, and naval operations, as well as preserving coastal views. Despite this potential, the Trump administration has aggressively targeted and dismantled much of the domestic offshore wind sector, resulting in job losses and lost economic opportunities. A key example highlighted is the Department of Justice’s September 2023 reversal of approval for the Maryland Offshore Wind Project, which had previously been fully permitted by state and federal agencies. This move has drawn sharp criticism from industry groups like the Oceanic Network, which warn that such actions will raise electricity costs, deter private investment, delay economic growth, and weaken the power grid
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyfloating-wind-platformswind-turbinesclean-energyenergy-policyFrom Ørsted to Ontario: How Populist Conservatives Undermine Contract Sanctity - CleanTechnica
The article highlights a troubling pattern in conservative-led jurisdictions where populist governments undermine the sanctity of contracts in the renewable energy sector, creating significant risks for investors and developers. It begins with the Trump administration’s abrupt stop-work order on Ørsted’s nearly completed Revolution Wind project, justified vaguely by “national security” concerns despite all permits being secured and billions already invested. This move, now challenged in court, signals that even fully permitted and financed projects can be halted arbitrarily under populist conservative administrations in the U.S. The article situates this case within a broader trend seen in places like Ontario, Texas, and Alberta. In Ontario, Doug Ford’s government canceled 758 renewable energy contracts in 2018, including operational wind farms, and retroactively blocked legal recourse, causing massive financial losses and sending a clear political message that contracts are not guaranteed if the government disapproves. Texas saw a legislative attempt (SB 715) to retroactively impose new requirements on existing renewable projects,
energyrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-policycontract-lawoffshore-windenergy-investmentTrump Promised Abundant Energy But Has Only Delivered Deficits - CleanTechnica
The article critiques the Trump administration’s energy policies, highlighting a gap between promises of abundant, affordable energy and the reality of growing deficits and reliance on fossil fuels. While Energy Secretary Chris Wright praised the administration’s approach during a visit to Europe, European leaders prioritize renewable energy to achieve energy independence and aggressively reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050. The U.S. approach, labeled by Wright as “climate ideology,” contrasts sharply with Europe’s forward-looking stance. Despite efforts by the Trump administration to undermine climate science—such as disbanding a controversial research group and promoting climate skepticism—renewable energy use in the U.S. has grown significantly, reaching nearly 25% of power generation by June, driven largely by investments made before Trump’s presidency. The article also points out that many of Trump’s economic and energy promises, including halving energy prices and reducing gasoline costs below $2 per gallon, have not materialized. Instead,
energyrenewable-energyclimate-changefossil-fuelspower-generationclean-energyenergy-policySmall Modular Reactors and the Big Questions of Cost & Waste - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica critically examines the claims surrounding Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) as a transformative technology for nuclear energy and decarbonization. While SMRs are promoted as cheaper, safer, faster to build, and easier to finance than traditional large reactors, a recent study published in Progress in Nuclear Energy challenges these assertions. Authored by experts Philseo Kim and Allison Macfarlane, the study analyzes both economic and waste management aspects of SMRs. It finds significant uncertainties and structural challenges, particularly highlighting that SMRs may have higher levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) than anticipated, often exceeding $100 per MWh, due largely to the loss of economies of scale inherent in smaller reactors. Real-world projects, such as NuScale’s canceled flagship plant, underscore these cost overruns. On the waste front, the study reveals even more concerning issues. SMRs could produce two to thirty times more spent fuel per unit of energy compared to conventional reactors, with smaller
energynuclear-energysmall-modular-reactorsSMRsnuclear-wastedecarbonizationenergy-policyOklo to open first private nuclear fuel recycling facility in the US
Oklo Inc., a nuclear technology company, is set to open the United States’ first privately funded nuclear fuel recycling facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, with an investment of up to $1.68 billion. This facility will recycle used nuclear fuel, recovering usable materials to produce new fuel for advanced reactors such as Oklo’s Aurora powerhouse. The project is expected to create over 800 jobs and aims to reduce nuclear waste while establishing a secure domestic supply chain for clean, reliable, and affordable energy. Oklo is also exploring a partnership with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to recycle TVA’s used nuclear fuel, marking the first time a U.S. utility has considered converting its spent fuel into clean electricity. The United States currently stores over 94,000 metric tons of used nuclear fuel, which contains energy equivalent to about 1.3 trillion barrels of oil—five times the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. By unlocking this energy through modern recycling processes, Oklo’s initiative could significantly contribute
energynuclear-energyfuel-recyclingadvanced-reactorsclean-energyenergy-policynuclear-technologyThe Labor Day Legacy Of Offshore Wind Workers - CleanTechnica
The article commemorates Labor Day by highlighting the historical significance of workers' contributions to the U.S. economy and society, focusing particularly on offshore wind workers and the clean energy sector. It contrasts the current clean energy job growth under President Biden’s administration—with over 400,000 new jobs created and widespread investments in renewable energy projects—with the Trump administration’s policies that have hindered offshore wind development. Specifically, the Trump administration halted construction of the nearly completed Revolution Wind farm off Connecticut and Rhode Island, canceled $679 million in offshore wind funding, and withdrew a $716 million loan guarantee for a New Jersey offshore wind project. These actions jeopardize approximately 1,000 jobs and threaten the renewable energy goals of those states. Union leaders and clean energy advocates emphasize that clean energy jobs provide good wages, healthcare, and pensions, representing dignity for American workers. The article notes that clean energy investments and unionization rates have grown significantly, with the energy sector employment increasing by 3% in 2023,
energyoffshore-windclean-energyrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-jobsenergy-policyMAGA Using Laws Passed By Democrats To Upend Renewable Energy Projects - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica discusses how laws and environmental protections originally established by progressive lawmakers to safeguard wildlife and public lands are now being exploited by MAGA-aligned officials and fossil fuel interests to hinder renewable energy projects. These laws, such as the Federal Land Policy and Management Act’s prohibition against “unnecessary or undue degradation,” are being weaponized to block wind and solar developments. Critics argue this is an abuse of environmental regulations, turning tools meant to protect nature into obstacles for clean energy expansion. A key example highlighted is the Interior Department’s recent capacity density order, which sets strict limits on how much energy can be generated per unit of land. This metric, focusing narrowly on energy density, is criticized for ignoring the broader environmental and economic benefits of renewables. Experts point out that renewable installations can be removed and land restored relatively quickly, unlike fossil fuel infrastructure that causes long-term contamination. The article suggests that this approach by the Department of the Interior effectively acts as a ban on renewable projects on federal lands
renewable-energysolar-powerwind-energyenergy-policyenvironmental-lawfossil-fuelssustainable-energyThe Offshore Wind Industry Is Forever (Wind Jobs, Not So Much)
The article discusses recent setbacks to the U.S. offshore wind industry under the Trump administration, highlighting the cancellation and defunding of key projects that have resulted in significant job losses, particularly among unionized construction workers. Specifically, it notes that an 80% complete offshore wind project in New England was abruptly halted by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, sending hundreds of workers home and undermining job stability. Additionally, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy rescinded funding for 12 port improvement projects critical to supporting offshore wind infrastructure, further exacerbating job losses in the sector. These actions reflect a broader pattern of the administration’s opposition to offshore wind development, despite the industry's technological viability and global growth prospects. The article also explores the political dynamics surrounding these job losses, pointing out the irony that some workers affected by the shutdowns may have voted for Trump, who has long campaigned against offshore wind projects. While union leaders express frustration over the disruption to workers’ livelihoods, the article notes that political support among working-class
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-powerclean-energyenergy-policyjob-impactUS Pressuring Other Countries To Abandon Clean Energy And Climate Goals - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights the U.S. government's current efforts to undermine global clean energy and climate initiatives in favor of expanding fossil fuel use. It criticizes the administration for prioritizing fossil fuel interests by promoting “energy dominance” and opposing international agreements aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in sectors like shipping. The U.S. has reportedly threatened punitive measures such as tariffs and visa restrictions against countries supporting climate action, and has allied with oil-producing nations like Saudi Arabia to block production limits on fossil fuels. Key figures in the U.S. Energy Department have framed the choice as one between “freedom and sovereignty” through fossil fuels versus economic decline due to “climate alarmism.” European officials and climate experts express alarm over this U.S. pressure, especially given recent severe heat waves and the scientific consensus on the urgent need to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal. The article underscores the tension between the U.S. administration’s fossil fuel agenda and
energyclean-energyfossil-fuelsclimate-goalsenergy-policyinternational-energygreenhouse-gas-emissionsUS Flexes Its Marine Energy Muscles For 24/7 Baseload Power
The article discusses the evolving US energy policy under the “American Energy Dominance” framework, which prioritizes traditional 24/7 baseload power sources such as coal, oil, and gas, while reducing support for wind and solar industries, especially offshore wind. However, the policy also embraces certain renewable energy sources with baseload capabilities, notably hydropower, geothermal energy, biomass, and now marine energy. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has highlighted geothermal energy’s potential, and marine energy—harnessing kinetic energy from tides, currents, and waves—is gaining recognition as a reliable, weather-independent power source with significant untapped potential. Concrete support for marine energy is evident through initiatives like the Department of Energy’s inclusion of marine energy in its collaboration with Norway and the TEAMER (Testing Expertise and Access to Marine Energy Research) program. TEAMER facilitates research and development by providing access to testing facilities and expertise, having recently awarded support to 18 new marine energy projects. These projects span tidal, hydrokin
energymarine-energyrenewable-energybaseload-powergeothermal-energyhydropowerenergy-policyAmidst Energy Prices Rise, Trump Kills Jobs, Cuts Off Renewable Energy - CleanTechnica
The Trump Administration has issued a stop work order on the Revolution Wind offshore wind project in Rhode Island, halting progress despite the project being approximately 80% complete with 45 of 65 turbines installed. This project was designed to provide renewable energy to Rhode Island and Connecticut, supporting regional job creation and offering a clean energy alternative. The decision comes amid rising energy prices, drawing criticism for undermining efforts to expand affordable and sustainable energy sources. Environmental advocates, including the Sierra Club, have strongly condemned the administration's move. Sierra Club Climate Policy Director Patrick Drupp highlighted that offshore wind represents one of the cheapest and most reliable energy options available, and accused the Trump Administration of prioritizing fossil fuel interests over clean energy solutions. The Sierra Club, a leading grassroots environmental organization, continues to advocate for clean energy development, community health, and environmental protection through activism and policy engagement.
energyrenewable-energyoffshore-windwind-turbinesclean-energyenergy-policyenvironmental-activismOffshore Wind Vs. Natural Gas Pipeline Slugfest Emerging In US
The article discusses recent conflicts between the US offshore wind industry and natural gas pipeline projects, highlighting government actions that have stalled key renewable energy developments. Specifically, the Interior Department has issued a stop-work order on the Revolution Wind offshore wind project off Rhode Island’s coast, despite it being 80% complete. This halt also affects Connecticut, a project partner. The official reason cited involves unspecified security concerns, which the article suggests may be a pretext. A similar freeze occurred earlier this year on New York’s Empire Wind project, which was temporarily halted but later resumed after political negotiations involving state and federal officials and the energy company Equinor. Underlying these renewable energy setbacks is the resurgence of natural gas pipeline proposals, notably the Constitution pipeline and Project Maple. The Constitution pipeline, initially proposed in 2014 to transport gas from Pennsylvania to New England, was previously rejected but has recently re-emerged and is reportedly fast-tracked for approval. Project Maple, linked to Canadian firm Enbridge, aims to expand the
energyoffshore-windnatural-gas-pipelinerenewable-energyenergy-policyinfrastructureenvironmental-impactTrump Works To Sabotage Offshore Wind Alliances - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights the Trump administration’s efforts to undermine offshore wind energy projects, focusing on the nearly completed $4 billion Revolution Wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island. Despite having all necessary permits, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) halted all activities citing unspecified “concerns,” threatening the project and broader alliances among commercial fishers, environmentalists, clean energy advocates, and investors. The move has sparked legal challenges, with Connecticut and Rhode Island attorneys general condemning the freeze as harmful to renewable energy development, economic interests, and consumers who may face higher energy costs as a result. The article contrasts the Trump administration’s aggressive support for fossil fuels—including oil, gas, and coal—with its obstruction of clean energy initiatives. It notes that policies under this administration have rolled back environmental regulations, frozen federal clean energy funding, and targeted wind energy, the largest renewable power source in the U.S. The administration’s rhetoric, exemplified by DOI statements dismissing wind energy
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyclean-energywind-farmsenergy-policyfossil-fuelsAI & Electricity: Two Perspectives - CleanTechnica
The article "AI & Electricity: Two Perspectives" from CleanTechnica discusses the growing concern over the substantial electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence (AI) data centers. Analyses suggest that within a few years, AI data centers could consume up to 12% of the United States' total electrical demand. This surge in power consumption comes at a time when about 90% of new electricity generation is from renewable sources like wind and solar. However, current U.S. government policies are criticized for favoring expensive and polluting energy sources such as coal and methane, which could exacerbate electricity costs for consumers and manufacturers alike. Economist Paul Krugman highlights the economic implications of rising electricity costs linked to AI infrastructure. He points out that utilities typically pass the cost of expanding capacity to support data centers onto ordinary customers, contributing to a recent spike in retail electricity prices that outpaces overall inflation. The largest U.S. grid operator has recommended that large data centers generate their own power to alleviate grid strain
energyAI-energy-consumptiondata-centersrenewable-energyelectricity-pricesenergy-policypower-gridNew US Solar Power Plant features soil and habitat restoration.
The article highlights a new 100-megawatt solar power plant project in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, which exemplifies the convergence of renewable energy demand, local cooperative involvement, and sustainable land management. The project is tied to Meta’s data center development at Sage Mill Industrial Park, with Silicon Ranch as the solar developer. This initiative is part of Meta’s broader strategy, marking its 18th solar project with Silicon Ranch across four states, totaling over 1,500 megawatts of capacity. The plant aims to address growing energy needs while supporting a potential solar resurgence in South Carolina, a state that has seen fluctuating solar development in recent years. A key aspect of the project is its connection to the rural electric cooperative network, specifically the Central Electric Power Cooperative and its 19 local member cooperatives. These cooperatives play a crucial role in delivering electricity to rural areas, continuing a legacy from the Great Depression era when rural communities organized their own power providers. The collaboration between Silicon Ranch
energysolar-powerrenewable-energysolar-power-plantdata-centersenergy-policyrural-electric-cooperativesUS Energy Secretary Calls For An End To All Subsidies For Solar & Wind - CleanTechnica
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, during a visit to Ames National Laboratory in Iowa, called for an end to all federal subsidies for wind power, arguing that after 33 years of incentives, the wind industry has matured and should now compete fairly in the marketplace alongside other energy sources. Wright emphasized the need for the US to mine and refine its own critical raw materials, highlighting national security and economic concerns tied to reliance on foreign sources, particularly China. He praised Ames Laboratory’s efforts to revitalize domestic capabilities in rare earth minerals essential for technologies like electric vehicles, storage batteries, and artificial intelligence. The article critiques Wright’s stance by pointing out the irony that his personal wealth stems from fossil fuel industries that have benefited from government subsidies and lax regulations, including the externalized environmental and health costs often ignored in economic calculations. It underscores that untaxed externalities—such as pollution and climate damage—are effectively subsidies for fossil fuels, with the International Monetary Fund estimating these costs in the trillions. While Wright acknowledged climate
energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-powerenergy-subsidiesfossil-fuelsenergy-policySolar & Storage Industry Statement on Treasury Department Changes to Tax Credit Guidance - CleanTechnica
The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), led by president and CEO Abigail Ross Hopper, issued a strong statement condemning recent Treasury Department guidance that narrows the “Commence Construction” rules for energy tax credits. SEIA views this move as a politically motivated “side deal” by the administration with anti-clean energy groups, undermining Congressional intent as established in H.R. 1. The guidance is criticized for threatening thousands of small businesses in the solar industry and potentially delaying the expansion of affordable, reliable clean energy in the U.S. SEIA warns that these restrictions will increase electricity costs for American families and businesses while allowing China to gain a competitive edge in powering emerging technologies like AI. The association is actively reviewing the guidance and considering next steps to defend the industry and national interests. SEIA urges the administration to cease political interference and focus on practical solutions to meet growing energy demand and maintain U.S. competitiveness in clean energy development. Founded in 1974, SEIA represents over 1,
energysolar-energyclean-energyenergy-tax-creditssolar-industryrenewable-energyenergy-policyMake America Gaslit Again - CleanTechnica
The article "Make America Gaslit Again" from CleanTechnica discusses the looming energy shortfall in the United States due to declining fossil fuel power plants and slow development of new nuclear facilities. It highlights that no new traditional nuclear plants are currently planned, with small modular reactors unlikely to appear before 2030. Coal power is rapidly declining, with significant retirements expected, and while some new gas plants are planned, the net fossil fuel capacity is decreasing by nearly 18,608 MW over the next three years. Although substantial wind and solar capacity additions are projected, political opposition, particularly from the Trump administration, threatens to curtail renewable energy growth. The article warns that rising energy demand combined with this shortfall could lead to power reliability issues, especially impacting rural and low-income urban areas. Drawing from personal experience with resilient, non-electric home systems, the author advises individuals to prepare for potential outages by installing solar power systems with battery backups. This preparation not only offers financial benefits but could also provide critical
energyrenewable-energynuclear-powerfossil-fuelswind-powersolar-powerenergy-policyUS abandons solar project to restart 615MWe nuclear plant
The Duane Arnold Energy Center, a 615 MWe boiling water nuclear reactor in Iowa, ceased operations in 2020 after more than 45 years of service. Originally shut down due to economic reasons and damage from a 2020 derecho storm, the plant was never fully dismantled and has been maintained in a SAFSTOR state, preserving its core infrastructure. NextEra Energy, the plant’s majority owner, had initially planned to develop a solar project on the site, transferring the plant’s grid interconnection rights to this new venture. However, in 2025, NextEra formally requested the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to restore the original interconnection rights to prioritize restarting the nuclear facility instead. This shift reflects a broader national trend of reconsidering previously closed nuclear plants as part of efforts to expand carbon-free energy sources. NextEra is currently conducting a comprehensive engineering evaluation to assess the feasibility of recommissioning Duane Arnold, with initial assessments indicating the reactor remains in good condition and could potentially
energynuclear-powersolar-energypower-plant-restartenergy-infrastructurerenewable-energyenergy-policyFailed US Government Wants To Dismantle Solar For All Program - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the Biden administration's Solar For All program, funded with up to $7 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act, aimed at helping low- and moderate-income households install solar energy systems and expand community solar projects. The initiative was projected to benefit 900,000 households—many in conservative "red states"—by reducing fossil fuel dependence and saving over $350 million annually in utility costs. However, the program is now facing termination efforts led by the EPA under leadership aligned with former Trump administration policies, with plans to rescind grants to 60 state agencies, nonprofits, and Native American tribes. This move is seen as prioritizing funding for tech billionaires and defense spending over support for disadvantaged communities. Despite the program's early successes, including completed solar and battery installations for Native American tribes by Indigenized Energy, the potential rollback threatens ongoing and future projects. Advocates argue that dismantling Solar For All contradicts the stated national interest in addressing the energy crisis and expanding clean energy access.
energysolar-energyrenewable-energysolar-powerclean-energyenergy-policycommunity-solarWhat Makes Geothermal Energy So Special?
The article discusses the rising prominence of geothermal energy within the context of the recent “American Energy Dominance” policy, which primarily supports fossil fuels and nuclear power while limiting federal backing for wind and solar energy. Geothermal energy stands out because it can provide reliable baseload power—continuous electricity generation regardless of weather—putting it in direct competition with coal and natural gas. Unlike biomass and hydropower, which have geographic and resource limitations, geothermal energy’s potential is expanding due to innovative technologies such as enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) and advanced closed-loop systems (ACLs). These advances, combined with improved drilling techniques and data analytics, are unlocking vast geothermal resources beyond traditional Western US sites, with estimates suggesting up to 90 gigawatts of geothermal power could be harnessed nationwide by 2050. Despite the policy support, the geothermal industry has faced challenges in securing favorable tax treatment and navigating regulatory hurdles. Early versions of tax legislation threatened to impose restrictive deadlines and reduce incentives, but industry advocacy
energygeothermal-energyrenewable-energybaseload-powerenhanced-geothermal-systemsenergy-policyUS-energyRepublicans Put Pressure On Trump To Salvage Funding For Renewables - CleanTechnica
The article discusses growing pressure from several Republican Senators on the Trump administration to preserve funding for renewable energy projects, particularly those supported by the Inflation Reduction Act under the Biden administration. Despite Trump’s public stance favoring an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy, his administration has actively sought to impede solar and wind energy development. Republican concerns stem from the risk that insufficient energy production could lead to consumer dissatisfaction and electoral repercussions in 2026. Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota highlights the necessity of including wind energy to meet rising power demands, noting that over half of clean energy projects initiated since the Inflation Reduction Act face jeopardy, threatening jobs and investments in communities that traditionally favor limited government intervention. Complicating the energy landscape, the oil and gas industry itself shows limited enthusiasm for expanding fossil fuel production, as market factors like oil prices and global supply-demand dynamics outweigh political incentives. Meanwhile, renewable energy’s appeal continues to grow, with 96% of new global electricity demand met by renewables last
energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-energyclean-energyenergy-policyenergy-storageTrump Promised to ‘Drill, Baby, Drill.’ The New Rigs Are Nowhere to Be Found
The article examines the gap between former President Donald Trump’s campaign promise to “drill, baby, drill” and the current realities of U.S. oil and gas production under his administration. Despite efforts to roll back regulations, open more public lands for drilling at reduced royalty rates, and cut incentives for renewable energy, the increase in oil output has been modest and slower than under the previous Biden administration. Gasoline prices have remained relatively stable, and crude oil exports have actually declined compared to the previous year. The article highlights that energy markets are largely driven by global supply and demand dynamics rather than domestic policy alone. A key indicator of drilling activity, the weekly rig count published by Baker Hughes, shows a decline from 580 rigs at the start of Trump’s term to 542 recently, near a four-year low. This stagnation is largely attributed to crude oil prices hovering near the break-even point for new drilling (around $60 per barrel), combined with increased costs due to tariffs on steel and other
energyoil-drillingfossil-fuelsoil-pricesenergy-policyoil-rigscrude-oilEurope’s $750 Billion Energy Pledge To Trump Is Pure Political Theater - CleanTechnica
In July 2025, the European Union and the United States announced a trade agreement in which Europe pledged to purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy products over three years, alongside significant investments in American infrastructure and manufacturing. This deal was hailed as a major diplomatic and economic victory for President Trump. However, analysts have criticized the energy commitment as largely symbolic political theater rather than a feasible economic plan, given the enormous scale and logistical challenges involved. Currently, the EU imports about $76 billion annually in U.S. energy, mainly LNG, petroleum, and nuclear fuels. Meeting the agreement's target would require tripling these imports almost immediately, which faces significant barriers. U.S. and European LNG infrastructure is already near capacity, and expanding export and import facilities would take years and substantial investment. Shipping constraints and long-term contracts with other suppliers further limit Europe's ability to increase U.S. energy imports rapidly. Additionally, European energy companies operate in competitive global markets and are unlikely to prioritize U.S. supplies
energyEuropean-UnionUnited-StatesLNGenergy-infrastructureenergy-tradeenergy-policyPhilippine President Reconfirms Commitment To Renewable Energy, Wants "Sleeping" Projects To Wake Up - CleanTechnica
In his July 28 State of the Nation Address, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. reaffirmed his administration’s strong commitment to expanding renewable energy in the country’s energy mix, targeting 35% renewable utilization by 2030 and 50% by 2040. Currently, renewables account for only 22% of electricity generation. He emphasized the need to “wake up” numerous stalled or “sleeping” renewable energy projects, which face challenges such as difficulties in securing land rights, delays in completing critical System Impact Studies for grid connection, bureaucratic hurdles, and lack of developer commitment. Offshore wind projects face additional obstacles due to the absence of specialized port infrastructure and a local supply chain, leading to reliance on imports and increased costs. The President urged government agencies to address these systemic issues to accelerate project development. He also highlighted ongoing efforts to diversify clean energy sources, including solar, wind, and natural gas—considered a lower-emission “bridge fuel.” Marcos announced plans to complete nearly
energyrenewable-energyPhilippinesoffshore-windenergy-policyenergy-projectssustainable-energyWyoming Wants Renewables — Why Isn't The Trump Administration Listening? - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the conflicting dynamics in Wyoming regarding energy policy under the Trump administration. While Wyoming politicians support the “Big Beautiful Bill” that provides tax breaks to the struggling fossil fuel industry, they are simultaneously concerned about the negative impact of the Trump administration’s executive order terminating clean electricity production and investment tax credits for wind and solar projects. Wyoming generates about 10,200 megawatts of electricity, with nearly one-third coming from wind and solar, which are the fastest-growing and cheapest energy sources in the state. The loss of these tax credits threatens hundreds of renewable energy projects, potentially leading to higher electricity costs for residents and economic setbacks for the state. The Trump administration’s executive order enforces stricter deadlines for renewable projects to qualify for tax credits, requiring construction to begin before July 4, 2026, and operation by the end of 2027. This timeline is challenging given the lengthy permitting processes, especially under an administration less favorable to renewables. The order also criticizes wind and
energyrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powerelectricity-generationenergy-policyclean-energyMaine Focuses On Renewables Even As Trump Revokes Climate Policies - CleanTechnica
Maine is advancing its clean energy agenda despite federal rollbacks under the Trump administration. Governor Janet Mills signed legislation accelerating the state's transition to 100% clean energy, setting a target of 90% renewable and 10% low or zero-carbon energy sources by 2040—moving previous goals up by a decade. The state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) has already driven significant economic benefits, including over $100 million in direct investments, nearly $900 million in operations spending, and more than 1,000 full-time jobs between 2008 and 2022. In 2023, approximately 65% of Maine’s energy came from renewable sources. Regional collaboration is a cornerstone of Maine’s strategy, with the Maine Public Utilities Commission directed to work with other New England states to negotiate competitively priced energy contracts and jointly procure clean energy, transmission, and storage projects. This cooperative approach is vital given the interconnected nature of power systems and the need to manage costs and reliability effectively.
energyrenewable-energyclean-energyenergy-policyenergy-transitionclimate-goalsenergy-storageFortescue Cancels Flagship Hydrogen Projects: UK Should Take Notice - CleanTechnica
Fortescue’s recent cancellation of two flagship green hydrogen projects—one in Gladstone, Australia, and another in Arizona, USA—signals significant economic challenges facing hydrogen as a mainstream energy source beyond industrial feedstock use. Despite substantial financial backing, government grants, and initial optimism, both projects proved financially unviable amid shifting policy landscapes and market realities. The Arizona project, an 80 MW facility, was undermined by the removal of US hydrogen subsidies, leading to a $150 million pre-tax loss write-off. Similarly, the Gladstone plant, partially operational and supported by about A$60 million in government grants, was shut down due to high costs and competitiveness issues, with potential grant repayments under evaluation. These setbacks underscore hydrogen’s struggle to compete economically without extensive subsidies, a pattern echoed globally as major firms like BP, Shell, and Iberdrola scale back or abandon hydrogen energy projects. The broader hydrogen industry faces mounting practical and financial hurdles, including infrastructure challenges related to storage, distribution,
energyhydrogen-energygreen-hydrogenenergy-policyrenewable-energyenergy-infrastructureenergy-subsidiesThe Truth About The "One Big Beautiful Bill" - CleanTechnica
The article "The Truth About The 'One Big Beautiful Bill'" by Luke Singer and Gautam Wadhwa critically examines the implications of the recent tax and spending reconciliation bill (OBBB) on healthcare, the job market, and clean energy in the United States. A major concern highlighted is the bill’s historic rollback of Medicaid funding by over $1 trillion over the next decade, which threatens healthcare accessibility and affordability for millions, particularly seniors. Although Medicare funding remains intact, the Congressional Budget Office warns that the bill could endanger the lives of up to twelve million Americans by the end of the next decade due to increased healthcare costs and reduced access. On the economic front, the OBBB introduces tax cuts and enhanced deductions aimed at stimulating small businesses, especially in retail and hospitality, potentially boosting near-term job creation. However, many of these tax benefits are temporary and set to expire by 2028–29. The bill also negatively impacts clean energy investments by ending most federal tax credits for residential solar and
energyrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-policyenergy-jobsclimate-crisisSizewell’s Exploding Budget Exposes Europe’s Nuclear Blindspot - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the dramatic cost escalation of the UK’s Sizewell C nuclear power project, whose budget has nearly doubled from £20 billion in 2020 to almost £38 billion today. This surge is framed not as an isolated incident but as symptomatic of broader, systemic issues within Europe’s nuclear power development efforts. Despite Europe’s ambitions to expand nuclear energy to meet climate goals, the article argues that governments and utilities have repeatedly underestimated the complexity and scale required for successful nuclear deployment. Drawing on historical evidence and expert analysis, the article outlines seven critical factors for successful nuclear programs: a strategic national priority with consistent government oversight; integration with military nuclear objectives; use of a single, fully proven standardized reactor design; deployment of large-scale gigawatt reactors; comprehensive government-supported training programs; rapid and sustained deployment over decades; and construction of numerous reactors to realize economies of scale. When applied to Europe’s European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) program, these criteria reveal significant shortcomings. European nuclear efforts lack consistent
energynuclear-powerEuropeenergy-policynuclear-reactorsclean-energyenergy-infrastructureSecretary Burgum Must Personally Approve All Renewable Energy Projects On Federal Lands - CleanTechnica
The US Department of the Interior (DOI) has issued a directive requiring Secretary Doug Burgum’s personal approval for all wind and solar energy projects on federal lands and waters, significantly increasing scrutiny over renewable energy development. This policy shift aligns with the Trump administration’s broader agenda to reduce federal support for renewables and bolster conventional energy sources like coal, natural gas, and nuclear. The directive follows President Trump’s executive order aimed at ending subsidies for what are deemed “unreliable” and foreign-controlled energy sources, as well as the recent “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which phases out tax credits for wind and solar energy. DOI officials argue that these changes will promote grid reliability, national security, and American job creation by leveling the playing field for dispatchable energy sources. Industry and environmental groups have strongly opposed the directive, warning that the additional approval requirements could delay or derail renewable projects already vulnerable due to expiring tax incentives. They emphasize that such delays would increase costs, create uncertainty, and hinder the deployment
energyrenewable-energyfederal-landswind-powersolar-powerenergy-policyclean-energyA Zombie US Offshore Wind Project Fights For Life
The Maryland Offshore Wind Project, a 2-gigawatt initiative led by US Wind—a Baltimore-based subsidiary of the Italian firm Renexia SpA in partnership with US asset manager Apollo Global Management—continues to advance through the federal permitting process despite significant political and regulatory challenges. Although US President Donald Trump pledged to curtail the US offshore wind industry and has taken actions to halt or delay projects, the Maryland project has persisted, reflecting the long-term nature of such developments. US Wind and Maryland Governor Wes Moore remain committed to moving forward, even as legal battles and appeals complicate progress. The project has faced criticism due to its foreign ownership, but foreign involvement in US energy projects is historically common. The permitting process has been lengthy and complex, with US Wind waiting over 13 years since its formation in 2011 to develop the offshore lease awarded by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in 2014. Key milestones were reached in late 2023, including approvals for
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyUS-WindMaryland-wind-projectwind-powerenergy-policyElon Musk Tricked Into Doing The Bidding Of The Oil Industry - CleanTechnica
The article discusses Elon Musk’s recent political maneuvers, highlighting his departure from both the Democratic and Republican parties and his intention to start a new political party. The author critiques Musk’s political naivety, noting that attempts to break the two-party dominance in the U.S. have repeatedly failed. A key point is that Musk was effectively "tricked" into supporting the Republican Party, which aligns closely with fossil fuel interests that ultimately undermine Tesla’s business. While Democrats had enacted several pro-EV policies benefiting Tesla—such as tax credits, funding for charging infrastructure, and stricter vehicle efficiency standards—the GOP, once in full power, moved to dismantle many of these supports. The article also notes that Musk’s support for Republicans may have contributed to Donald Trump’s electoral success, despite Musk’s own companies facing investigations that were later dropped during his brief influence. Regarding Musk’s plan to launch a new political party, the author is skeptical about its viability in winning major elections, citing historical precedents
energyelectric-vehiclesTeslaEV-batteryrenewable-energyfossil-fuel-industryenergy-policyEnergy Independence From The USA Is Coming For Much Of The World - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica discusses the evolving concept of energy independence, particularly in relation to the United States and the global reliance on oil. While energy independence in the U.S. is often narrowly defined as producing enough oil domestically to meet its own needs, this perspective overlooks the complexities of oil markets and the broader global desire to reduce dependence on U.S. oil and other petrostate-controlled resources. Many countries are currently in imbalanced relationships with the U.S. due to their reliance on oil for transportation and economic stability, and they are increasingly motivated to achieve their own energy independence. A key example highlighted is Ethiopia, which has taken proactive steps toward energy independence by implementing bans on oil imports and investing in alternative energy sources. The article suggests that such moves will likely spread to dozens or even hundreds of countries, signaling a significant shift away from the century-long dominance of oil and petrostate influence. This transition toward distributed energy independence is expected to reshape global economic and political dynamics in the coming century, marking
energyenergy-independenceoilrenewable-energydistributed-energyenergy-policyclean-energyWill We Increase Coal Production To Make America Great Again? - CleanTechnica
The article argues that despite former President Donald Trump’s promises to revive the coal industry, his policies have not and likely will not lead to a meaningful increase in coal production or coal mining jobs. During Trump’s first term, about 20% of coal mining jobs were lost, and many coal companies went bankrupt, causing the Dow Jones Coal Index to cease operations. Although Trump publicly supported coal, his administration’s promotion of fracking and natural gas created stiff competition for coal, undermining the industry’s recovery. Furthermore, the coal industry currently faces significant structural challenges, including no new coal power plants planned or under construction, and a shrinking domestic market as coal-burning capacity is expected to decline by 12-13% between 2025 and 2028. The article also highlights that coal exports, which had helped the industry recover somewhat after Trump’s first term, are now hindered by tariffs and trade tensions, limiting international demand for U.S. coal. Meanwhile, renewable energy sources like wind and solar
energycoal-productionrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powerenergy-policypower-generationSome Early Responses to Big Bad Budget Bill - CleanTechnica
The recently passed 2025 reconciliation budget bill, controversially labeled the “One Big Beautiful Bill” by Donald Trump and Republicans, has drawn significant criticism from cleantech industry groups and environmental advocates. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), led by Abigail Ross Hopper, condemned the bill as a major setback for the U.S. energy economy, particularly at a time of rising energy costs and global instability. SEIA highlighted that the bill threatens the burgeoning solar and storage manufacturing sector, risking factory closures and job losses that would undermine rural industrial revival and cede strategic advantage to China. Despite avoiding some harmful provisions, the bill was criticized for prioritizing partisan politics over practical, growth-oriented energy solutions that promote American energy independence. Similarly, the BlueGreen Alliance criticized the bill for repealing clean energy investments that would have created millions of manufacturing and construction jobs nationwide. Their statement emphasized that the bill’s passage would shutter projects, cost jobs, weaken U.S. competitiveness in the global clean technology market, and
energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-storageenergy-policyrenewable-energyenergy-manufacturingFinal GOP bill kneecaps renewables and hydrogen, but lifts nuclear and geothermal
The recently passed Republican reconciliation act, approved by a narrow 218-214 vote and awaiting President Donald Trump’s expected signature, significantly rolls back key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) related to clean energy incentives. The bill reduces or eliminates tax credits for solar, wind, and clean hydrogen projects, while preserving some benefits for nuclear, geothermal, and battery storage technologies through 2033. Solar and wind developers must now either connect projects to the grid by the end of 2027 or begin construction within 12 months of the bill’s passage to qualify for tax credits, tightening timelines compared to previous legislation. This shift is likely to impact sectors reliant on rapid deployment of renewable energy, such as data centers and climate tech startups, with green hydrogen companies facing particularly steep challenges as their tax credits are set to expire by 2027—five years earlier than under the IRA. While geothermal, nuclear, and battery storage incentives remain largely intact, new restrictions related to “foreign entities of concern” could
energyrenewable-energyclean-energynuclear-powergeothermal-energyhydrogen-fuelenergy-policyBig Horrible Budget Bill Still Going To Kill Countless American Jobs - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica criticizes a recent large budget bill passed by Senate Republicans, arguing that it will significantly increase the US deficit by providing substantial tax cuts to billionaires and large corporations while eliminating key tax credits for the electric vehicle (EV) and solar industries. The author contends that these cuts will cost the country numerous jobs and harm the economy, particularly in Republican-controlled states, as the fossil fuel industry seeks to reduce competition from clean energy sectors to prolong profits from oil, coal, and gas. The bill is portrayed as favoring fossil fuel interests, which have strong influence over the Republican Party, and undermining America’s manufacturing resurgence and global energy leadership. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) strongly opposes the bill, warning that it will lead to higher electric bills, factory closures, job losses, and a weaker electric grid. SEIA’s president, Abigail Ross Hopper, emphasizes that the legislation would damage America’s competitiveness, destabilize its energy future, and cede technological
energysolar-energyfossil-fuelsenergy-policyclean-energyelectric-gridenergy-jobsThis Reconciliation Bill Proposal Isn’t Just Misguided ... - CleanTechnica
The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), led by president and CEO Abigail Ross Hopper, strongly criticizes the U.S. Senate's recently unveiled reconciliation bill proposal, calling it a direct attack on American energy, workers, and consumers. Hopper argues that the bill would severely harm industries that currently help lower electricity costs, boost U.S. manufacturing, and lead in new power capacity development. She warns that if the bill passes, it will result in higher power bills, job losses in factories, increased household energy expenses, greater reliance on foreign energy, and heightened risks of blackouts. SEIA emphasizes that the bill does not reform the energy system but instead sabotages it, urging lawmakers to consider the negative consequences for the economy, energy security, and everyday Americans. The association, which represents over 1,200 companies in the solar and solar-plus-storage sectors, advocates for policies that promote job creation, fair market competition, and the growth of affordable, reliable solar power. Founded in 1974,
energysolar-energyclean-energyenergy-policyrenewable-energyenergy-industryenergy-billsCutting US Energy Credits Doesn’t Save Money. It Steals It From Ratepayers & Local Governments. - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica discusses the ongoing Congressional debate over cutting federal clean energy tax credits, particularly those supporting solar energy. While some lawmakers view these credits as a way to reduce federal deficits, the article argues that eliminating them would be counterproductive. Solar tax credits have driven a significant industrial revival in the U.S., generating billions in GDP, federal and state tax revenues, and millions of jobs. In 2023 alone, the solar industry contributed over $75.5 billion to the U.S. economy and paid $15.7 billion in combined federal and state/local taxes. Studies show that for every dollar spent on solar tax credits, Americans save $2.67, partly due to lower electricity costs; removing these credits could increase electricity bills by $51 billion nationally, with some states facing increases over $110 per year. The article highlights the critical role of solar energy in state economies, including traditionally conservative states like Texas, Utah, Indiana, North Carolina, and Georgia, where solar contributes
energyclean-energysolar-powerenergy-tax-creditsrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-industryLuján Reintroduces Community Solar Bill To Counter GOP Attacks On Clean Energy - CleanTechnica
Senator Ben Ray Luján has reintroduced the Community Solar Consumer Choice Act in response to Republican efforts to repeal clean energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. This legislation aims to expand access to community solar projects for families and businesses historically excluded from the clean energy transition, particularly low-income households. The bill mandates electric utilities to offer community solar options to all customers, requires affordable subscription models, and prioritizes equity. It also authorizes the Department of Energy to provide financial assistance through grants, loans, and technical support to accelerate deployment of shared solar projects nationwide. Representative Kathy Castor (D-FL) introduced a matching bill in the House, emphasizing that many Americans are locked out of rooftop solar due to renting, living in multi-family buildings, or upfront costs. The legislation seeks to break down these barriers by enabling more Americans to benefit from clean energy, save on electric bills, and create good-paying clean energy jobs. While the bill does not reinvent the community solar model,
energyclean-energysolar-powercommunity-solarrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-legislationGlobal Offshore Wind Market Sails Away From US
The global offshore wind market is poised for another strong year in 2025, with 8 gigawatts of new capacity added in 2024, marking the fourth-highest annual installation on record. The total installed offshore wind capacity now powers approximately 73 million households worldwide. Additionally, offshore wind farms under construction reached a record 48 gigawatts, and governments globally set a new record for offshore lease auctions at 56 gigawatts. However, despite this robust pipeline, the industry faces significant challenges, particularly due to policy instability and supply chain constraints. The United States, despite its vast offshore wind potential—estimated by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at 4 terawatts combining fixed-bottom and floating turbines—has notably lagged, dragging down the global market’s short-term outlook. The Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) highlights that the US’s negative policy environment, alongside failed auctions in the UK and Denmark, has led to a 24% downgrade in the short-term growth forecast
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energywind-powerenergy-policyglobal-energy-marketwind-turbinesNREL Welcomes 30 Participants To Join Energy to Communities Peer-Learning Cohorts on Utility Engagement and Load Growth - CleanTechnica
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), has selected 30 local leaders from 25 states, territories, and Tribes to participate in two new Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohorts. These cohorts, running from July to December 2025, will convene monthly to address critical energy challenges related to electricity load growth and utility engagement. One cohort focuses on "Navigating Electricity Load Growth and Associated Utility Grid Impacts," aiming to help communities adapt to rising electricity demand driven by emerging industries like AI and data centers, while maintaining grid reliability and resilience. The other cohort, "Engaging With Electric Utilities for Successful Local Partnerships," will provide participants with knowledge about electric utility regulation, business models, and collaborative strategies to foster innovation and support local energy needs. These cohorts build on E2C’s existing work, which has engaged over 200 communities through educational resources, case studies, tools, and facilitated collaboration. The
energyelectricity-load-growthutility-engagementgrid-infrastructurerenewable-energyenergy-policycommunity-energy-programsNew York to build first nuclear plant in decades to power factories
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced plans to build the state’s first new nuclear power plant in nearly four decades, aiming to develop a zero-emission facility with at least 1 gigawatt (GW) capacity. The New York Power Authority (NYPA), in coordination with the Department of Public Service (DPS), will immediately begin evaluating technologies, business models, and potential sites for the plant, focusing on factors such as public safety, community support, infrastructure compatibility, skilled labor availability, and financing options. This initiative supports New York’s broader goals of electrifying its economy, retiring fossil fuel plants, and attracting manufacturing jobs, while ensuring a reliable, affordable, and clean energy grid. Currently, New York’s existing nuclear capacity of 3.4 GW—generated by three plants operated by Constellation on Lake Ontario—provides about 20% of the state’s electricity and 42% of its carbon-free power. The new plant would increase total nuclear capacity to approximately
energynuclear-powerclean-energypower-gridNew-Yorkzero-emissionenergy-policyBill C-5 has potential to accelerate a stronger, future-ready Canada, but only if we get the details right - Clean Energy Canada
Bill C-5, recently passed by the House of Commons, aims to accelerate Canada’s clean economy by enabling the government to fast-track projects that contribute to national interests, including clean growth and climate objectives. Rachel Doran, executive director of Clean Energy Canada, supports the bill’s inclusion of climate goals as a factor in project approval and the removal of federal barriers to interprovincial trade and labour mobility. She highlights the potential for the bill to enhance energy security by expediting transmission projects and prioritizing skilled workers essential to clean economy sectors, such as EV mechanics and wind turbine technicians. However, Doran emphasizes the need for certain improvements to ensure the bill’s effectiveness. She argues that contributing to Canada’s climate goals should be a mandatory criterion rather than one of many considerations. Additionally, she recommends limiting the extraordinary powers granted by the bill to a shorter timeframe, such as three years, to maintain oversight. The bill’s implementation must also align with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
energyclean-energyenergy-transitionclimate-changeclean-economyrenewable-energyenergy-policyNew York State wants more nuclear power in a big way
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has announced plans for the state to develop a large new nuclear power facility designed to generate at least 1 gigawatt of electricity. Emphasizing the importance of nuclear energy in reducing fossil fuel dependence, Hochul directed the New York Power Authority (NYPA) to spearhead the project, though specific site and design choices remain undecided. The state intends to collaborate with private partners for development, finance construction, and purchase the plant’s output. Potential locations include existing nuclear plants in upstate New York. This initiative aligns with a broader trend of tech companies like Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon investing in nuclear power to secure clean energy for their operations. Despite renewed interest, the nuclear industry faces significant challenges, including the absence of new nuclear plant construction in the U.S. for over 15 years and historical issues with cost overruns and delays. Hochul highlighted the need for federal regulatory and permitting reforms to expedite project timelines, noting that current barriers reside primarily in Washington
energynuclear-powerrenewable-energypower-plantsclean-energyenergy-policysmall-modular-reactorsEmber Claims Battery Storage And Solar Can (Almost) Do It All - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights a recent Ember report that emphasizes the growing capability and cost-effectiveness of combining solar power with battery storage to provide nearly continuous electricity supply. In the sunniest regions, such as Las Vegas, pairing 5 kW of solar panels with a 17 kWh battery can deliver a stable 1 kW of power 24/7 throughout the year, covering about 97% of constant electricity needs cost-effectively. While this example is based on a modest power demand, the key takeaway is that the levelized cost of solar-plus-storage electricity has become the lowest among energy sources, making solar increasingly dispatchable and reliable beyond daylight hours. This development marks a significant shift in the energy landscape, enabling solar power to support continuous power contracts for industries requiring 24/7 electricity, especially in emerging economies and remote areas lacking grid infrastructure. Solar-plus-storage can also reduce grid expansion costs by maximizing existing grid connections and deferring upgrades. With battery storage capacity in the US
energysolar-powerbattery-storageclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-energy-storageThere Could Be A Huge Surge In US EV Sales In Rest Of 2025, And Then Big Crash - CleanTechnica
The article discusses a proposed Republican plan to eliminate key U.S. electric vehicle (EV) tax incentives, which could significantly impact the EV market starting in 2026. Specifically, the $7,500 tax credit for new EVs would end 180 days after the budget bill's passage, the tax credit for leased EVs produced outside the U.S. would be removed immediately, and the $4,000 tax credit for used EVs would expire 90 days after the bill is signed. This removal of incentives is expected to cause a sharp decline in EV sales after an initial surge in late 2025, as consumers rush to buy EVs before the credits disappear, followed by a steep market crash due to reduced demand. The article highlights that this policy shift will not only disrupt sales but also undermine long-term business confidence and investment in the U.S. EV and solar sectors. The unpredictability of incentives creates challenges for manufacturers who rely on stable, long-term planning and capital investment. Consequently
electric-vehiclesEV-tax-creditUS-EV-marketrenewable-energysolar-energyelectric-car-salesenergy-policyUS fast-tracks nuclear reactor testing to catch up with China’s boom
The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has launched a pilot program to accelerate the testing and commercial licensing of advanced nuclear reactors, aiming to catch up with China’s rapid nuclear energy expansion. This initiative, authorized under President Donald Trump’s executive order on reforming nuclear reactor testing, allows private companies to construct and operate test reactors outside national laboratories. The program seeks to streamline development by requiring applicants to demonstrate technological readiness, financial viability, and a plan to achieve reactor criticality by July 4, 2026. Selected companies will bear all costs related to design, construction, operation, and decommissioning, with applications due by July 21, 2025. This move is part of a broader effort to boost American innovation in nuclear technology, enhance economic growth, and strengthen national security. It builds on existing DOE and Department of Defense projects involving microreactors and advanced reactor demonstrations. The urgency stems from China’s aggressive nuclear expansion, which includes 102 reactors operating, under construction, or approved
energynuclear-energyadvanced-reactorsDOEnuclear-reactor-testingenergy-policyclean-energyBig Oil Has A Plan - Waste As Much Energy As Possible - CleanTechnica
The article discusses recent actions by the U.S. government, specifically the elimination and de-prioritization of the Energy Star program by the EPA under the Trump administration. Energy Star, a bipartisan initiative started by Republicans, has been highly effective in saving consumers money—$14 billion in 2024 alone—and significantly reducing carbon emissions since 1992. The program’s termination is seen as a deliberate move to slow the transition to renewable energy and prolong fossil fuel dependence, benefiting incumbent energy producers like Big Oil. Environmentalist Bill McKibben highlights that such policies appear designed to waste energy, aligning with fossil fuel industry interests that historically favor energy inefficiency to maintain market dominance. The article also contrasts this approach with the preferences of businesses globally, where 97% reportedly favor switching to renewable energy due to its efficiency, cost stability, and reduced geopolitical risks. McKibben criticizes the U.S. government’s contradictory stance, citing a Department of Energy goal to increase fossil fuel exports and foreign
energyfossil-fuelsrenewable-energyEnergy-Star-programemissions-reductionenergy-policyclimate-changeState vs. Local Control Over Energy Siting Sparks Debate In Pennsylvania - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the longstanding controversy over who should control the siting of new electrical generating facilities, focusing on recent debates in Pennsylvania. Historically, energy siting decisions have been contentious due to the trade-offs between proximity to demand centers and local community impacts, especially with thermal plants and now renewable projects like solar farms and wind turbines. Local communities, particularly in rural areas, often oppose such developments due to concerns about aesthetics and quality of life, fueling political tensions between rural and urban interests. In Pennsylvania, lawmakers are considering establishing a state-level board called the Reliable Energy Siting and Electric Transition Board (RESET) to centralize authority over energy siting decisions, replacing the current patchwork of local regulations. Proponents argue that localities lack the expertise to handle complex, costly energy projects and that local opposition causes delays and increased costs. However, opponents fear the board could favor thermal generation projects, increasing carbon and methane emissions contrary to climate goals. Clean energy advocates emphasize the need to streamline approvals for renewable projects,
energyenergy-sitingrenewable-energypower-generationenergy-policysolar-farmswind-turbinesSenate GOP bill spares nuclear and geothermal energy while hammering wind and solar
Senate Republicans have introduced a budget reconciliation bill that significantly scales back renewable energy incentives established under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), particularly targeting solar, wind, and hydrogen energy. The bill proposes ending residential solar tax credits within 180 days of enactment and disqualifying solar leasing companies from receiving credits, which would severely impact the residential solar market. Commercial wind and solar projects would face a shortened timeline for tax credits, with full credits only available for projects starting within six months of the bill’s signing and phased reductions thereafter, disappearing entirely after 2027. Hydrogen tax credits would also end this year, creating additional challenges for hydrogen startups. In contrast, the bill largely spares geothermal, nuclear, hydropower, and long-duration energy storage technologies, with only slight extensions to their tax credit phase-outs. Carbon capture incentives would be modified to eliminate distinctions based on the use of captured carbon, making all projects eligible for the same credit level. Notably, the inclusion of long-duration energy storage could
energyrenewable-energysolar-powerwind-energynuclear-energygeothermal-energyenergy-policyThe Unbelievably Big Bad Bill Hurts IRA Incentives And Red States - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the significant negative impact of the proposed "One BIG Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA) on the clean energy incentives established by the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The OBBBA, supported by former President Trump and the House Ways and Means Committee, aims to end tax credits for cleaner vehicles by 2025 and gradually eliminate incentives for wind, solar, and nuclear energy projects by 2032. This rollback threatens to derail the rapid growth of clean energy in the U.S., which saw a 47% increase in capacity in 2024, with solar and battery technologies leading the expansion. The article highlights that clean energy investments have created over 240,000 manufacturing jobs, with 78% of spending benefiting Republican-held suburban and rural districts. The rollback is linked to the Trump administration’s preferential treatment of oil and gas exploration and its suspension of clean energy development on federal lands. Since January, businesses have canceled or delayed more than $20 billion in clean energy
energyclean-energyrenewable-energyelectric-vehiclessolar-powerbattery-manufacturingenergy-policyRepublican Budget Bill to Raise People's Energy Prices - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica discusses the potential negative impacts of a Republican budget bill that aims to repeal clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act. According to a report by NERA Economic Consulting, commissioned by the Clean Buyers Energy Association, removing these technology-neutral tax incentives—such as the §45Y production tax credit and §48E investment tax credit—would lead to higher energy prices across 19 states. The analysis highlights that without these credits, energy systems would rely more heavily on traditional, costlier energy sources, resulting in significant electricity price increases, with seven states facing double-digit percentage hikes between 2026 and 2032. The broader economic consequences of repealing clean energy tax credits are severe. The report warns that inflated energy costs would suppress commercial and industrial activity, reduce labor and capital demand, and cause wage losses and declining household incomes. This combination would constrain consumer spending and economic resilience, leading to shrinking economies, increased financial strain on households, and potential job losses in key
energyclean-energytax-creditselectricity-priceseconomic-impactrenewable-energyenergy-policyRepublicans in House Who Don't Want Clean Energy Tax Credits Cut Look to Senators to Save Them - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the political dynamics surrounding clean energy and electric vehicle tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Although these incentives disproportionately benefit districts represented by Republican lawmakers, many Republicans initially voted to cut these tax credits to align with party and oil and gas industry interests. However, 13 Republican House members from vulnerable districts, led by Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA), have recently expressed strong concerns about provisions that would phase down these incentives and impose strict new supply chain requirements, warning that such measures could threaten billions in investments and thousands of jobs. These lawmakers have appealed to Senate leaders, urging them to restore the tax credits in the final bill to support U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers, emphasizing the need for a "pro-energy growth" approach that balances taxpayer protection with economic opportunity. Notably, while tax credits for renewables face cuts, incentives for nuclear power and biofuels remain intact, reflecting political preferences that may not align with maximizing competitiveness against
energyclean-energytax-creditsrenewable-energyInflation-Reduction-Actenergy-policyenergy-investmentAlberta's Renewable Energy Sabotage: Time For Federal Intervention - CleanTechnica
The article highlights Alberta’s newly introduced reclamation security requirements for renewable energy projects, set to take effect by May 31, 2025, which are described as unprecedentedly severe and punitive. Developers must post securities equal to 30% of anticipated decommissioning costs at project start, increasing to 60% after 15 years, with these rules applied retroactively to existing projects by 2027. The exclusion of salvage value from these calculations inflates financial burdens well beyond international norms, making Alberta’s requirements the highest globally. This regulatory shift contrasts sharply with Alberta’s historically lax reclamation policies for fossil fuel industries, which have accumulated tens of billions in unfunded cleanup liabilities with minimal upfront financial assurances, effectively shifting cleanup costs to taxpayers. The article argues that this move represents a politically motivated, ideologically driven attack on the renewable energy sector, undermining investor confidence by breaking contractual norms through retroactive application of harsh financial obligations. Such instability threatens to halt billions in investments and push companies to relocate
energyrenewable-energyAlbertaenergy-policyenvironmental-regulationfossil-fuelsinvestment-risks3 Ridiculous Things About Donald Trump Forcing A Coal Power Plant To Stay Open - CleanTechnica
The article by Steve Hanley criticizes the Trump administration, specifically the Department of Energy led by a fossil fuel billionaire, for forcing a Michigan utility company to keep an outdated and polluting coal power plant operational despite having a newer natural gas plant built to replace it. This mandate is described as absurd and counterproductive, especially given the administration’s contradictory stance on climate change: denying global warming publicly while invoking emergency powers due to expected extreme heat to justify keeping the coal plant running. Hanley highlights this as a hypocritical and environmentally harmful approach that exacerbates global heating rather than addressing it responsibly. Additionally, the article points out the irony of a Republican-led government, which typically advocates for limited government intervention, imposing a heavy-handed federal order that disrupts market efficiency and forces Consumers Energy to maintain an uneconomical power source. This intervention leads to higher electricity costs for ratepayers across Michigan and 14 other states, with no prior consultation from state regulators or grid operators. The author condemns this as unnecessary government overreach that increases financial burdens on consumers while undermining clean energy progress, labeling the policy as “brilliant idiocy” for its counterproductive and costly consequences.
energycoal-power-plantfossil-fuelselectricity-gridenergy-policyclimate-changeutility-costsHigh Energy Bills? Blame A Republican! - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica highlights the impending rise in energy bills this summer, largely due to increasing natural gas prices and higher temperatures driving up air conditioning use. It emphasizes the role of the US solar industry as a sustainable solution to these challenges, but criticizes Republican lawmakers for advancing policies that threaten this progress. Specifically, the article points to a recently passed House budget bill—dubbed the “Big Beautiful Bill” by Trump and House Republicans—that includes provisions undermining domestic solar manufacturing and installation, particularly harming states that supported Trump in the 2024 election. The piece details how the Biden administration had invested federal grants and loans into solar manufacturing facilities in Trump-voting states, aiming to create jobs and economic growth. However, the new budget bill threatens to eliminate these programs, which the Solar Market Insight report warns will disproportionately impact solar jobs and factories in these regions. With Republicans controlling both the House and Senate, the article argues that they hold the power—and responsibility—to reverse these damaging changes but are unlikely to do so. Instead, the article suggests that Republicans favor building more gas power plants, a less sustainable approach that could further exacerbate high energy costs. Overall, the article assigns significant blame to Republican congressional actions for the rising energy bills and job losses in the renewable energy sector, while acknowledging other factors also contribute to energy cost increases. It underscores the political dynamics at play, where Republican control of Congress and the administration’s policies are at odds, with the future of clean energy incentives and programs hanging in the balance.
energysolar-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-billssolar-manufacturingUS-energy-industryEnergy Department Orders Michigan Coal Generating Station To Remain Open - CleanTechnica
The U.S. Energy Department, led by Chris Wright, issued an emergency order mandating that the 63-year-old J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant in Michigan remain operational for at least 90 days, overriding a previously approved decommissioning plan set by the Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) in 2022. The plant was scheduled to close as part of a transition plan that included replacing its capacity with a methane-fired power plant already purchased by Consumers Energy, the utility owner. Wright justified the order by citing concerns over potential electricity shortages in the Midwest during the summer due to insufficient baseload power from coal, gas, and nuclear plants. However, the Michigan PSC and the utility company stated they neither requested nor were consulted about the emergency order, highlighting a lack of coordination and transparency. The decision has drawn criticism for bypassing the usual regulatory process, which typically involves public comment and agency review, and for imposing significant financial burdens on consumers. Dan Scripps, chair of the Michigan PSC, estimated that keeping the coal plant running could cost ratepayers across 15 states tens of millions of dollars, potentially nearing $100 million. The Energy Department defended the order by referencing longstanding warnings from grid operators about the risks of decommissioning baseload power sources but did not provide evidence of a cost-benefit analysis or acknowledge the existing replacement plan. Emergency orders of this nature are described as highly unusual, underscoring the controversial and unprecedented nature of this intervention.
energycoal-powerenergy-policypower-gridelectricity-generationfossil-fuelsenergy-departmentWhy Clean Equals Competitive When Building Canada’s Trade Alliances Beyond the US - Clean Energy Canada
The article from Clean Energy Canada highlights the urgent need for Canada to diversify its trade alliances beyond the United States in response to deteriorating trust and unpredictable trade policies under the Trump administration. Canada is well-positioned to pivot towards global markets, as it holds trade agreements covering 60% of the global economy. Importantly, Canada’s top non-US trade partners have committed to net-zero emissions, implemented carbon pricing, and are adopting carbon border adjustments and electric vehicle (EV) requirements. These policies signal a global shift away from fossil fuels toward clean energy, creating growing demand for low-carbon products and technologies. Canada’s competitive advantage lies in its abundant clean energy resources, low electricity costs, and rich deposits of critical minerals essential for clean technology, such as cobalt, lithium, nickel, and copper. The country’s renewable energy capacity has expanded significantly and continues to attract substantial investment, with Indigenous partnerships playing a key role. The global market for clean energy technologies is projected to nearly triple by 2035, offering Canada an opportunity to grow its clean economy, support domestic demand, and increase exports. To capitalize on this, the article recommends a coordinated industrial policy focused on industries that align with net-zero goals, trade diversification, and building domestic clean supply chains using Canadian resources and expertise. In summary, Canada’s future economic competitiveness hinges on embracing clean energy and leveraging its natural and technological assets to meet the evolving demands of global trade partners committed to sustainability. This strategic shift will help Canada reduce reliance on the US market, enhance energy security, and position the country as a leader in the global clean economy.
clean-energyrenewable-energycarbon-pricingelectric-vehiclesclean-technologyenergy-policylow-carbon-economyTransforming Canada: Mapping A 100% Electrified Energy Economy - CleanTechnica
The article "Transforming Canada: Mapping A 100% Electrified Energy Economy" explores Canada’s critical juncture in transitioning its energy system toward full electrification and renewable integration. Drawing on the author's experience with Ireland’s 2050 energy roadmap and collaboration with Canadian energy leaders, the piece highlights the opportunity for Canada to adopt a similarly ambitious, clean, secure, and affordable energy framework. Despite differences in scale, Canada and Ireland share challenges like decarbonization, energy independence, and affordability. Canada’s abundant renewable resources and technological capacity position it well for this transformation. Currently, Canada’s energy system is heavily reliant on fossil fuels, primarily oil and natural gas exports to the U.S. and increasingly Asia, which creates economic vulnerabilities amid global market and geopolitical uncertainties. Domestically, fossil fuels dominate heating, transportation, and industry, resulting in significant inefficiencies and energy waste—about 1,500 TWh of the roughly 2,500 TWh primary energy consumed annually is lost, mainly as waste heat from combustion processes. The author presents Sankey diagrams illustrating current energy flows and envisions a fully decarbonized, electrified Canadian energy economy. While the diagrams are preliminary, they underscore the scale of inefficiency in the current system and the potential gains from electrification and renewable integration. The article serves as an initial reflection and call to action for inclusive, forward-looking energy planning in Canada.
energyrenewable-energyelectrificationdecarbonizationenergy-policyclean-energyenergy-transformationWant to Claim the Solar Tax Credit? Get Installing Now
energysolartax-creditphotovoltaicinstallationrenewable-energyenergy-policyRepugnican Budget Bill Could Decimate US Solar Industry - CleanTechnica
solar-energyrenewable-energysolar-industryenergy-policyclean-energymanufacturingenergy-incentivesSEIA: Solar & Storage Industry Statement on U.S. International Trade Commission Injury Determination - CleanTechnica
solar-energysolar-manufacturingclean-energyrenewable-energyenergy-policysolar-industryenergy-storageTrump Loses Big Game Of Offshore Wind Chicken, Bigly
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyconstructionEquinorTrump-administrationenergy-policyNew Texas Bill Threatens Growth Of Wind & Solar Industry - CleanTechnica
energyrenewable-energywind-powersolar-powergrid-reliabilityTexas-legislationenergy-policySolar & Storage Industry Statement on Proposed Reconciliation Legislation in U.S. House Committee Markups
energysolar-powerclean-energyenergy-policyenergy-securityrenewable-energysolar-industryChuyên gia hạt nhân Dubna làm việc với Viện Năng lượng Nguyên tử Việt Nam
energynuclear-energyVietnamcollaborationatomic-energysustainable-developmentenergy-policyKinh nghiệm quốc tế chuyển từ FIT sang đấu thầu và cơ chế khác cho năng lượng tái tạo Gợi ý với Việt Nam
energyrenewable-energyFITauction-mechanismenergy-policyclimate-changeenergy-transitionThủ tướng Phạm Minh Chính tiếp Chủ tịch Tập đoàn Hoa Điện Trung Quốc
energyrenewable-energyclean-energyhydropowerenergy-storageenergy-policysustainable-developmentJob posting: Policy Analyst
clean-energyrenewable-energyclimate-actionenergy-policyclean-technologyenergy-transitionsustainability'Việt Nam tiến tới làm chủ công nghệ năng lượng hạt nhân'
energynuclear-energygreen-energyenergy-technologyenergy-policyVietnam-energyatomic-energyThúc đẩy chuyển dịch năng lượng tái tạo Việt Nam chủ động tìm lời giải công nghệ và chính sách
energyrenewable-energyVietnamenergy-policysustainable-developmentenergy-transitionclean-technologyTình hình đàm phán giá năng lượng tái tạo chuyển tiếp cập nhật 14 5 2025
energyrenewable-energyenergy-transitionpower-purchase-agreementsenergy-policyelectricity-marketenergy-projectsTham khảo một số Luật Năng lượng Nguyên tử trên thế giới
energynuclear-energyenergy-policyenergy-regulationclean-energyenergy-securityatomic-energyTrump Should Be Held Accountable For Defunding Renewable Energy Projects
renewable-energyclimate-changesolar-powerwind-energyenergy-policyclean-energygreenhouse-gas-emissionsSolar Power Has Surged in “Trump States” in 2020s
energysolar-powerrenewable-energyclean-energysolar-capacityenergy-policyenergy-investmentTrao đổi của EVN về điều chỉnh giá điện tháng 5 2025 và các tác động đến từng nhóm khách hàng
energyelectricity-pricingnuclear-energyEVNenergy-policyconsumer-impactenergy-regulationCơ chế cho nguồn điện sử dụng khí trong nước và LNG nhập khẩu Nghị định 100 2025
energynatural-gaselectricity-generationrenewable-energypower-systemsenergy-policythermal-powerQuy định chi tiết về cơ chế cho các dự án điện sử dụng khí trong nước và LNG nhập khẩu
energynatural-gaselectricity-generationrenewable-energyenergy-policythermal-powerenergy-regulationBàn về Dự thảo Luật Năng lượng Nguyên tử Việt Nam sửa đổi
energynuclear-energyenergy-policyVietnamsafety-regulationsenergy-lawatomic-energyTầm nhìn chính sách năng lượng Việt Nam Tham khảo gợi ý của chuyên gia quốc tế
energyrenewable-energyenergy-policysustainable-developmentVietnam-energynuclear-energyclimate-changeNhững điểm mới quan trọng tại Dự thảo Luật Năng lượng nguyên tử sửa đổi
energynuclear-energyenergy-policysafety-regulationssustainable-energyenergy-strategyatomic-energyPhê duyệt khung giá phát điện cho loại hình nhà máy thủy điện tích năng năm 2025
energyhydropowerelectricity-pricingrenewable-energyenergy-policyenergy-generationenergy-marketKế hoạch giảm lệ thuộc nước ngoài về nhiên liệu hạt nhân của Hoa Kỳ
energynuclear-energyuranium-enrichmentrenewable-energyenergy-supply-chainsustainable-developmentenergy-policyBlue States Sue Feds Over Halt To Wind Energy Projects
energywind-energyrenewable-energyclean-energyfederal-regulationsenergy-policyjob-creationUS Offshore Wind Industry Lives To Fight Another Day
energyoffshore-windrenewable-energyclean-energyenergy-policywind-powerenergy-industryTrump’s Policies Are Creating Uncertainty for Fossil Fuel Companies
Trump-policiesfossil-fuel-industryenvironmental-regulationsproject-approvalenergy-policyuncertaintypipeline-developmentFinland Could Be the First Country in the World to Bury Nuclear Waste Permanently
nuclear-wasteFinlandpermanent-disposalnuclear-powerspent-fuelenergy-policyenvironmental-sustainability