Articles tagged with "driver-assistance-systems"
Tesla Removed Autopilot. The Data Says Safety Wasn’t Lost - CleanTechnica
The article discusses Tesla's recent removal of Autopilot and Autosteer as standard features in North America, initially perceived by the author as a potential step back for safety and a move to push the Full Self Driving subscription. While Autopilot has been widely regarded as a safety-enhancing feature that reduces driver workload and smooths control, the author emphasizes that such assumptions require rigorous testing through large-scale, independent data rather than relying on driver perception or small datasets. Traffic safety outcomes like fatalities are extremely rare events (about one per 100 million miles), making it difficult to draw confident conclusions from limited data due to the "law of small numbers," where small samples can produce misleading results dominated by randomness. The author highlights the challenge of evaluating Autopilot’s safety using Tesla’s own published statistics, which compare crash rates with and without Autopilot engagement. These statistics are not independently verified and lack normalization for important factors such as road type, driver behavior, and exposure context. Since Autopilot
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemstraffic-safetyself-driving-technologyautomotive-roboticsTechCrunch Mobility: RIP, Tesla Autopilot, and the NTSB investigates Waymo
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has launched an investigation into Waymo following reports that its robotaxis illegally passed stopped school buses multiple times in at least two states. This development adds scrutiny to Waymo’s autonomous vehicle operations amid growing regulatory attention. Meanwhile, Tesla made significant moves in its automated driving technology ahead of its quarterly earnings report. Tesla began offering front-seat robotaxi rides in Austin using a fleet of modified Model Y vehicles running an advanced version of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, moving toward broader deployment despite human safety operators still being present and chase vehicles following some cars. In a notable shift, Tesla discontinued its basic Autopilot system, which had been standard in all vehicles since 2014, and is now focusing solely on its more advanced, subscription-based Full Self-Driving software. This change comes shortly after Tesla stopped charging a one-time $8,000 fee for FSD, opting for a monthly subscription model instead. The move appears aimed at increasing
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-AutopilotWaymoAI-in-transportationdriver-assistance-systemsrobotaxiTesla discontinues Autopilot in bid to boost adoption of its Full Self-Driving software
Tesla has discontinued its Autopilot branding amid regulatory pressure and in an effort to promote adoption of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. This move follows a California judge’s ruling that Tesla engaged in deceptive marketing by overstating the capabilities of both Autopilot and FSD, leading to a 30-day suspension of Tesla’s manufacturing and dealer licenses in California. To comply, Tesla removed the Autopilot name, now offering new vehicles with only Traffic Aware Cruise Control as standard, while it is unclear if existing customers are affected. The company also shifted its FSD pricing model from a one-time $8,000 fee to a $99 monthly subscription, with plans to increase the subscription cost as the software improves. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has expressed confidence that future FSD versions will enable fully unsupervised driving, allowing drivers to engage in other activities during trips. Recently, Tesla deployed robotaxi versions of its Model Y in Austin, Texas, operating without human safety monitors but still
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslaFull-Self-Drivingdriver-assistance-systemsrobotaxiautomotive-technologyLemonade launches an insurance product for Tesla Full Self-Driving customers
Digital insurer Lemonade is launching a new insurance product tailored specifically for users of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, promising to reduce per-mile insurance rates by approximately 50%. This product, called “Autonomous Car insurance,” leverages previously unavailable vehicle telemetry data obtained through a technical collaboration with Tesla. Lemonade will use this data to train usage-based risk prediction models that differentiate between when a driver is using Tesla’s FSD software versus manually operating the vehicle, allowing for dynamic pricing based on actual driving behavior. The product will initially launch in Arizona on January 26, followed by Oregon in February. While Tesla’s FSD system is not yet fully autonomous and requires drivers to remain attentive, Lemonade’s offering reflects a bet on the future realization of true self-driving capabilities. The insurer emphasizes that Tesla’s AI-driven system, which can monitor surroundings 360 degrees and react instantly, represents a fundamentally different type of “driver” compared to humans. Lemonade’s existing pay-per-mile
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslaAIinsurance-technologyvehicle-telemetrydriver-assistance-systemsLearning from Data: Volkswagen Group Launches Europe-Wide Initiative for Greater Road Safety - CleanTechnica
Volkswagen Group is launching a Europe-wide initiative starting January 2026 to enhance road safety by optimizing driver assistance systems using sensor and image data collected from customer vehicles in real traffic conditions. Building on successful experience in Germany, the program will expand to about 40 European countries and cover multiple Volkswagen Group brands, including Volkswagen Passenger Cars, CUPRA, ŠKODA, Audi, Porsche, and Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles. The data-driven improvements will be delivered via software updates, aiming to increase driving comfort and safety for all road users. Importantly, the initiative requires explicit customer consent in full compliance with national and European data protection laws, with consent revocable at any time. The data collection focuses on specific traffic scenarios where driver assistance systems are most beneficial, such as intersections near schools or busy parking lots, triggered by events like emergency braking or evasive maneuvers. Relevant data includes camera images, sensor detections, vehicle dynamics (speed, steering angle), and environmental conditions (weather, visibility). This approach
IoTautomotive-technologydriver-assistance-systemssensor-dataautomated-drivingroad-safetysoftware-updatesHow Does Tesla FSDS Compare with Commercial Airliner Autopilot? - CleanTechnica
The article discusses Tesla’s Full Self Driving Supervised (FSDS) system in comparison to commercial airliner autopilot, drawing on insights from David Nye, a seasoned pilot with nearly 30,000 hours of autopilot monitoring experience and a long career flying various Boeing aircraft for Qantas. Nye highlights that just as commercial pilots primarily monitor autopilot systems rather than manually flying for extended periods, future drivers will similarly oversee automated driving systems that can operate more reliably and without human limitations such as fatigue or distraction. He emphasizes that autopilot technology in aviation has evolved to handle most phases of flight, reducing pilot workload and increasing safety, though pilots must retain manual flying skills for emergencies. Nye also shares personal anecdotes about the challenges of hand-flying long routes before autopilot systems were fully reliable, underscoring the fatigue and difficulty involved. He notes that while autopilot is now standard and essential in commercial aviation, there are concerns about pilots losing manual flying proficiency, which can be critical in unusual situations.
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Full-Self-Drivingautopilot-technologyAI-in-transportationmachine-learningdriver-assistance-systemsFord, Waymo, Tesla — Where Is Self-Driving Going in 2026? - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the current state and near-future outlook of self-driving technology, focusing on recent announcements from major players like Ford, Waymo, and Tesla as of early 2026. Ford revealed plans to introduce Level 3 (L3) eyes-off driving capabilities on its affordable electric vehicles starting in 2028, following new hardware and software development beginning in 2027. However, the article expresses skepticism about Ford’s timeline and scope, noting the company’s history of shifting EV strategies and the likely geographic limitations of its system, similar to the restricted road availability seen with GM’s Super Cruise and Ford’s existing Blue Cruise systems. In contrast, Waymo is already operating eyes-off robotaxi services in multiple cities and is expected to expand to dozens more by 2028, though it does not sell vehicles directly to consumers. Tesla’s Full Self Driving (FSD) system currently enables supervised long-distance trips and is progressing toward fully eyes-off driving, but Elon Musk has missed previous robotaxi
robotautonomous-vehiclesself-driving-carsautomotive-technologyAI-driving-systemselectric-vehiclesdriver-assistance-systems2,700 miles: Tesla's first coast-to-coast autonomous drive completed
A Tesla owner, David Moss, recently completed a 2,700-mile coast-to-coast trip across the United States using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software version 14.2 without manually taking control at any point. The nearly three-day journey covered diverse driving conditions, including highways, urban streets, complex interchanges, and multiple charging stops. Moss reported zero disengagements, with the vehicle handling navigation, lane changes, traffic signals, merging, and parking autonomously. The event gained significant attention online and was briefly acknowledged by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, highlighting Tesla’s advancements in autonomous driving technology. Technically, the drive demonstrates notable progress in Tesla’s FSD capabilities, managing challenging scenarios such as city traffic and construction zones. However, despite the “Full Self-Driving” label, Tesla’s system remains classified as a supervised driver-assistance technology, requiring drivers to stay alert and ready to intervene. It is not legally recognized as fully autonomous under current U.S. regulations
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslaself-driving-technologyartificial-intelligencedriver-assistance-systemstransportation-innovationRivian rolls out new ‘Universal Hands-Free’ driving feature
Rivian has released an update for its second-generation R1 electric vehicles introducing the new “Universal Hands-Free” driving feature. This software allows drivers to remove their hands from the wheel on over 3.5 million miles of roads across the US and Canada, including highways and surface streets with visible lane markings. However, drivers must remain attentive and supervise the system, as it does not stop or slow for traffic lights or stop signs, nor does it handle turns or navigation. The system will disengage if a driver signals a turn, requiring manual control. This update significantly expands Rivian’s hands-free driving capabilities from the previous limit of 135,000 miles of highway. Looking ahead, Rivian plans to develop full autonomous driving capabilities, aiming for point-to-point self-driving features by 2026. The company is working on a new autonomy computer with custom silicon and a roof-mounted lidar sensor for its upcoming R2 SUV, which will support these advanced functions. Alongside the driving update,
energyautonomous-vehiclesdriver-assistance-systemselectric-vehiclesautomotive-technologyAI-in-transportationcustom-siliconTesla faces scrutiny after US judge flags deceptive Autopilot claims
A California administrative law judge ruled that Tesla misled consumers through its marketing of Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) features, stating that the terminology falsely implied vehicles could operate autonomously without driver attention. The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) adopted this ruling and gave Tesla 60 days to correct its marketing claims. If Tesla fails to comply, the DMV will enforce a 30-day suspension of the company’s license to sell vehicles in California, although factory operations will continue uninterrupted. The DMV emphasized that the action aims to protect consumers by ensuring clear and accurate communication about advanced driver assistance systems. Tesla responded by downplaying the ruling’s impact, noting that no customer complaints were filed and that sales in California would continue without disruption. The DMV clarified that its case was based on how a reasonable consumer might interpret Tesla’s advertising, not on individual complaints. Meanwhile, Tesla faces additional legal challenges, including a class action lawsuit in California alleging long-term deception about the capabilities of its self
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotself-driving-technologydriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-regulationconsumer-protectionTesla engaged in deceptive marketing for Autopilot and Full Self-Driving, judge rules
An administrative law judge ruled that Tesla engaged in deceptive marketing by giving customers a false impression of the capabilities of its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving driver assistance software. This ruling stems from a long-running case initiated by California’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), which accused Tesla of overstating the autonomy of its systems, leading to overconfidence that contributed to numerous crashes and fatalities. The judge agreed with the DMV’s request to suspend Tesla sales and manufacturing licenses for 30 days each but allowed Tesla 90 days to modify or remove misleading language before enforcing these penalties. Tesla has faced multiple investigations from California’s Attorney General, the Department of Justice, and the Securities and Exchange Commission over similar allegations of misleading marketing. The company has also settled several personal injury lawsuits related to crashes involving Autopilot. The ruling comes as Tesla advances its Robotaxi service testing in Austin, Texas, where it recently removed safety monitors from its test vehicles—vehicles that run different software than those sold to customers. A
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemsRobotaxiautomotive-technologyself-driving-carsNissan & Wayve Sign Definitive Agreements to Deliver Next-Generation Driver Assistance Technology - CleanTechnica
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and AI company Wayve have signed definitive agreements to collaborate on integrating Wayve’s embodied AI technology into Nissan’s next-generation ProPILOT advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS). Building on Nissan’s existing ProPILOT series—which began in 2016 with single-lane highway assistance and evolved to multi-lane and hands-off functionality by 2019—this partnership aims to enhance driver assistance capabilities across a wide range of Nissan vehicles. A prototype unveiled in September 2025 showcased the integration of Wayve’s AI Driver software with Nissan’s “Ground Truth Perception” system, which uses next-generation LiDAR, demonstrating smooth and safe driving in both highway and complex urban environments. The collaboration will enable the deployment of Wayve AI Driver within mass-produced Nissan vehicles, starting with a model planned for release in Japan in fiscal year 2027. Nissan is the first automaker to commit to scaling Wayve’s embodied AI technology across multiple vehicle segments globally,
robotAI-technologyautonomous-drivingdriver-assistance-systemsLiDARadvanced-driver-assistance-systemsintelligent-mobilityMusk says new Tesla software allows texting and driving, which is illegal in most states
Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced via an X post that the latest version of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software allows drivers to text while driving without triggering any warnings. This feature is controversial because texting while driving is illegal in nearly all U.S. states, with about half banning any handheld phone use while driving. Despite Musk’s claims, FSD remains a driver-assistance system rather than full vehicle autonomy, requiring drivers to stay attentive and ready to take control at any moment. Tesla uses in-cabin cameras and sensors to monitor driver engagement, but the system’s reliance on driver readiness has been linked to crashes, and Musk has previously acknowledged that Autopilot can lead to driver complacency. Regulatory scrutiny of Tesla’s FSD is intensifying. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is investigating the software following reports of it running red lights, crossing into wrong lanes, and causing crashes in low-visibility conditions. Meanwhile, Tesla faces a legal challenge from the California
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslaFull-Self-Drivingdriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-technologyvehicle-safetyTesla "Full Self Driving" (FSD) — Licensing Strikeout, Patent Lawsuit - CleanTechnica
The article discusses recent developments surrounding Tesla's Full Self Driving (FSD) technology, focusing on Elon Musk’s shifting stance regarding licensing the software to other automakers. Initially optimistic about interest from legacy car manufacturers, Musk recently expressed surprise and frustration that few automakers want to license Tesla’s FSD. While earlier statements suggested significant interest and ongoing talks, Musk now describes inquiries from traditional automakers as minimal and encumbered by impractical demands. This shift highlights the tension between Musk’s belief in FSD’s transformative potential—which he expects will drive Tesla’s growth—and the reality that other manufacturers remain cautious, possibly due to the technology’s current limitations and lack of widespread consumer demand. Additionally, the article notes ongoing challenges with FSD’s readiness, citing limited robotaxi trials in Austin, Texas, that have experienced crashes despite human supervision, underscoring that the software still requires significant improvement before unsupervised deployment is viable. The timeline for broader adoption or licensing remains uncertain, with Musk predicting it could
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslafull-self-drivingAIautomotive-technologydriver-assistance-systemsChina’s Chery unveils 1056-mile-range hybrid EV that adds 280 miles in 5 minutes charge
Chinese automaker Chery’s premium sub-brand Exeed has unveiled the Exlantix ES7 GT, its first electric wagon-style vehicle, featuring a range-extender hybrid system combined with three electric motors. The ES7 GT is designed as a mid-to-large shooting brake that balances practicality with long-distance capability, boasting a remarkable range of over 1,056 miles on the CLTC cycle. Its 1,000-volt fast-charging system can add approximately 280 miles of range in just five minutes, significantly reducing charging downtime. The vehicle also incorporates aerodynamic improvements and independent front and rear suspension to enhance comfort and stability during sustained high-speed travel. Performance-wise, the ES7 GT accelerates from 0 to 62 mph in under three seconds, placing it among high-performance electric wagons. It retains Exeed’s electric powertrain architecture and advanced driver-assistance systems, including intelligent-driving software and safety features. Notably, the ES7 GT is equipped with a lidar-enabled Falcon
energyelectric-vehiclefast-charginghybrid-EVrange-extenderelectric-motorsdriver-assistance-systemsTesla releases detailed safety report after Waymo co-CEO called for more data
Tesla has released a detailed safety report on its Full Self-Driving (FSD) (Supervised) software, providing new data on its performance and collision rates in North America. According to Tesla, drivers using FSD travel approximately 2.9 million miles between major collisions and about 986,000 miles between minor collisions. These figures are significantly better than the national averages reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which indicate a major collision every 505,000 miles and a minor collision every 178,000 miles. Tesla defines major collisions as those involving airbag deployment or other irreversible restraints and includes incidents where FSD was active within five seconds before a collision, capturing a broad range of scenarios. This release follows calls from Waymo’s co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana for greater transparency from companies deploying autonomous driving technologies. Mawakana criticized the lack of publicly available data from companies like Tesla, emphasizing the responsibility to share safety information when removing drivers from behind the
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslaWaymodriver-assistance-systemsvehicle-safetyself-driving-technologyChina's BYD unveils new hybrid EV with staggering 1,335 miles range
China’s BYD has introduced the 2026 Qin L DM-i, a new plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) that significantly enhances range and efficiency. Positioned above the Qin Plus in BYD’s lineup, the Qin L DM-i combines a 1.5-liter gasoline engine with a powerful electric motor available in two outputs (161 or 214 horsepower). The vehicle offers an electric-only range of about 80 miles and achieves a fuel efficiency equivalent to approximately 84 miles per gallon after battery depletion, resulting in a total driving range of 1,335 miles. The sedan is designed for families and daily commuters, featuring a longer wheelbase and a more spacious interior, along with BYD’s latest Tianshen C driver-assistance suite for improved safety and comfort during long drives. BYD has maintained relatively stable pricing in China throughout 2025, opting for fewer new model launches compared to the previous year to focus on profitability and sustainable growth. Despite a slower expansion pace,
energyelectric-vehicleshybrid-carsBYDbattery-technologyfuel-efficiencydriver-assistance-systemsCherry's extended-range EV pushes boundaries with 870-mile range
Chery has introduced the Fulwin T11 EREV SUV, an extended-range electric vehicle that pushes boundaries with a total driving range exceeding 870 miles under CLTC testing conditions. The SUV features a 1.5-liter engine paired with dual electric motors delivering all-wheel drive and up to 154 horsepower, enabling acceleration from 0 to 60 mph in just over five seconds. The vehicle offers two lithium iron phosphate battery options—33.68 kWh and 39.92 kWh—providing pure electric ranges of approximately 105 to 112 miles, with an extended-range hybrid system boosting overall range significantly. The Fulwin T11’s design follows Chery’s latest styling cues, including narrow headlights connected by an LED strip and 21-inch wheels that enhance its sporty, wide stance. It is equipped with advanced driver assistance systems: the standard Falcon 500 system supports highway driving and parking assistance, while higher trims include the Falcon 700 system with urban Navigate on Autopilot (
energyelectric-vehicleslithium-iron-phosphate-batteriesextended-range-hybriddriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-technologyEV-rangeWeeds Of Protectionism: U.S. Bans On Connected-Car Tech & Their Global Consequences - CleanTechnica
The United States has announced a ban on connected vehicle technology originating from China and Russia, starting with software restrictions in the 2027 model year and extending to hardware by 2030. This regulation, issued by the Department of Commerce, targets connectivity systems and software enabling advanced driver assistance at SAE Level 3 and above, including cellular, Wi-Fi, satellite, and Bluetooth modules operating above 450 MHz. The ban excludes sensing technologies like LiDAR, radar, and cameras, as well as low-risk functions such as AM/FM radio and keyless entry systems using ultrawideband or frequencies below 450 MHz. The enforcement will be stringent, involving annual compliance declarations from automakers, detailed supplier records, import screening, and potential civil and criminal penalties reaching up to $1 million per violation. The regulation disproportionately impacts electric vehicles (EVs), which rely heavily on connected platforms for over-the-air updates, remote diagnostics, and advanced driver assistance, unlike many internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles that typically
IoTconnected-vehiclesautomotive-technologyvehicle-connectivitydriver-assistance-systemsnational-securitysoftware-regulationTesla challenges $243 million verdict in Autopilot death trial
Tesla has filed a motion seeking to overturn or retry a $243 million verdict against the company in a lawsuit related to a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system. The case arose after driver George McGee, operating a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged, failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with a parked SUV, killing 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and severely injuring her boyfriend. The jury assigned two-thirds of the blame to McGee and one-third to Tesla. Tesla’s lawyers argue that the verdict contradicts Florida tort law and due process, emphasizing that McGee’s reckless behavior—specifically, reaching for his phone at the time of the crash—was the primary cause. In their court filing, Tesla contends that product liability should only apply when a vehicle performs in ways that defy consumer expectations or are unreasonably dangerous, which they claim is not the case here. They warn that upholding the verdict could stifle innovation
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemsproduct-liabilitytransportation-technologyautomotive-safetyTesla could have avoided that $242.5M Autopilot verdict, filings show
In a recent federal court case in Miami, Tesla was found partially liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system, resulting in a $242.5 million jury verdict against the company. The crash occurred when a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged failed to brake at an intersection and collided with a Chevrolet Tahoe, killing Neima Benavides Leon and severely injuring Dillon Angulo, who were standing outside the vehicle. The jury apportioned two-thirds of the blame to the driver and one-third to Tesla. Tesla plans to appeal the verdict, citing significant legal errors and trial irregularities. Newly revealed legal filings show that Tesla had the opportunity to settle the case for $60 million months before the verdict but declined the offer. The lawsuit, filed in 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, focused on Tesla’s Autopilot system’s failure to prevent the crash. Tesla’s communications team has been disbanded, and
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-technologylegal-issues-in-roboticsvehicle-safety-systemsAt GM, Our Electric Pickups Are Built To Handle Truck Stuff - CleanTechnica
The article highlights General Motors’ (GM) commitment to producing electric pickup trucks that combine traditional truck capabilities with advanced technology. GM’s electric trucks, such as the 2026 GMC Sierra EV Denali and the Silverado EV Max Range WT, are engineered to handle typical truck tasks like towing, hauling, and off-road driving while offering intelligent features for enhanced user experience. Key innovations include four-wheel steering for improved maneuverability, specialized camera views for easier towing, and the exclusive Super Cruise driver assistance system that enables hands-free driving with a trailer on over 600,000 miles of compatible roads in the U.S. and Canada. Performance-wise, the GMC Sierra Denali EV can tow up to 12,500 pounds with the Extended Range battery and offers up to 478 miles of driving range with the Max Range battery. The Silverado EV Max Range WT leads the electric truck segment with an EPA-estimated range of 493 miles, a figure further extended in real-world testing through meticulous optimization of driving conditions
electric-vehiclesGMbattery-technologyelectric-trucksenergy-storagedriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-materialsVolkswagen ID. Buzz Sets Record & Wins Big "Top Minivan in 2025" Award - CleanTechnica
The Volkswagen ID. Buzz, an electric minivan with retro-inspired styling, has achieved significant recognition by setting a new record in J.D. Power’s 2025 Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study. This study, which measures owners’ emotional attachment and excitement across various experience areas, awarded the ID. Buzz an APEAL Index score of 882—the highest ever in the Minivan category since the study’s 2020 redesign. The vehicle was praised for its exterior design, smooth and powerful electric drivetrain, and user-friendly interior, also earning the highest Powertrain Index score in the Mass Market category. This strong consumer enthusiasm highlights the ID. Buzz’s appeal despite its niche status in the U.S. market. Volkswagen emphasizes the ID. Buzz’s combination of legacy brand elements with innovative electric mobility, featuring spacious seating for up to seven passengers, advanced technology like a 12.9-inch infotainment display, ambient lighting, and driver assistance systems. Higher trims add luxury
electric-vehiclesVolkswagen-ID.-Buzzelectric-drivetrainautomotive-technologyenergy-efficient-transportationelectric-mobilitydriver-assistance-systemsTesla Full Self Driving Supervised Update/Tweaks - CleanTechnica
The article provides a detailed user perspective on Tesla's Full Self Driving (FSD) Supervised version 12.6.3, highlighting its advanced capabilities and some current limitations. The author, an experienced driver, appreciates how the system learns driving habits, such as prioritizing frequent destinations, and responds well to voice commands for navigation. The FSD Supervised system demonstrates impressive driving accuracy, including maintaining lanes better than the author can, making wide left turns to avoid oncoming traffic, fully stopping at stop signs, and reacting appropriately to pedestrians, bicyclists, and obstacles like deer, fallen logs, and traffic cones. It also shows smart highway behavior by passing slow trucks and returning to the right lane, though this lane return is sometimes inconsistent. Despite these strengths, the article points out several notable faults. The system does not yet slow down for school zone speed limits with flashing yellow lights, which is puzzling given Tesla’s extensive engineering resources. Phantom braking remains a frequent issue, where the car
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Full-Self-DrivingAI-driving-systemsautomotive-technologydriver-assistance-systemssmart-navigationMiami Jury Finds Tesla Liable For Deadly Crash — Awards $329 Million In Damages - CleanTechnica
A Miami jury found Tesla partially liable for a deadly 2019 crash involving a 2019 Tesla Model S driven by George McGee, who had activated the Autopilot system but was manually accelerating and distracted by searching for his phone when the vehicle ran a stop-controlled T intersection. The Tesla crashed into a Chevy Tahoe, which then struck two pedestrians, killing one and severely injuring the other. The estate of the deceased sued Tesla, arguing that the Autopilot system failed to slow or stop the car at the intersection. Tesla countered that once the driver manually accelerated, many of Autopilot’s safety features were overridden and placed full blame on the driver’s negligence. After a two-week trial, the jury apportioned fault as two-thirds to the driver and one-third to Tesla, awarding $129 million in actual damages plus $200 million in punitive damages, totaling $329 million. The punitive damages were intended to punish Tesla for allegedly misleading marketing and unsafe deployment of Autopilot beyond controlled
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotself-driving-technologyautomotive-safetyAI-in-transportationdriver-assistance-systemsTesla partly liable in Florida Autopilot trial, jury awards $200M in damages
A federal jury in Miami found Tesla partly liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot driver assistance system, assigning one-third of the blame to Tesla and two-thirds to the driver. The crash occurred when neither the driver nor Autopilot braked in time at an intersection, resulting in the death of 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and severe injury to her boyfriend. The jury awarded approximately $242.5 million in total damages, including punitive damages solely against Tesla. This verdict marks one of the first major legal rulings against Tesla regarding its Autopilot technology, which the company has previously addressed through settlements. Plaintiffs' lead attorney criticized Tesla for marketing Autopilot as suitable beyond controlled-access highways without restricting its use, accusing the company and Elon Musk of fostering overconfidence in the system that endangered lives. Tesla announced plans to appeal, arguing the verdict was legally flawed and that no vehicle in 2019 could have prevented the crash, emphasizing that the
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-safetyself-driving-technologylegal-liabilityTesla partly liable in Florida Autopilot trial, jury awards $329M in damages
A Miami federal jury found Tesla partly liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot driver assistance system, awarding $329 million in punitive and compensatory damages to the plaintiffs. The crash occurred when neither the driver nor Autopilot braked in time at an intersection, resulting in a collision that killed 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and severely injured her boyfriend. The jury assigned two-thirds of the blame to the driver and one-third to Tesla. This verdict marks one of the first major legal rulings against Tesla regarding Autopilot, a technology the company has previously defended or settled related lawsuits over. Plaintiffs’ lead attorney Brett Schreiber criticized Tesla for designing Autopilot primarily for controlled highways but allowing its use elsewhere, coupled with Elon Musk’s public claims that Autopilot outperforms human drivers. Schreiber argued Tesla’s misleading promotion of the system endangered users and contributed to the fatal crash. Tesla announced plans to appeal the verdict, calling it legally
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemsautomotive-safetyself-driving-technologylegal-liabilityTesla partly liable in Florida Autopilot trial, jury awards $200M punitive damages
A federal jury in Miami found Tesla partially liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot driver assistance system. The crash occurred when neither the driver nor the Autopilot system braked in time at an intersection, resulting in a collision with an SUV that killed pedestrian Naibel Benavides Leon and severely injured her boyfriend. The jury assigned two-thirds of the blame to the driver and one-third to Tesla, awarding the plaintiffs $200 million in punitive damages along with compensatory damages for pain and suffering. This verdict marks one of the first significant legal rulings against Tesla concerning its Autopilot technology. The trial lasted three weeks and highlights growing scrutiny over the safety and accountability of driver assistance systems. The driver involved was sued separately, and the case is ongoing, with further developments expected.
robotautonomous-vehiclesTesla-Autopilotdriver-assistance-systemstransportation-technologylegal-issues-in-roboticsautomotive-safetyTesla is reportedly bringing a limited version of its robotaxi service to San Francisco
Tesla is set to introduce a limited version of its robotaxi service in San Francisco this weekend, following an initial rollout in Austin, Texas. The service will include a driver in the driver’s seat due to the lack of proper permits for fully driverless operation in California, and it remains unclear whether Tesla has obtained the necessary Public Utilities Commission approval to offer rides to the general public, as current permissions only allow rides for employees. Tesla plans to invite Tesla owners to test the service while pursuing regulatory approval in California amid ongoing legal challenges related to the company’s self-driving claims and safety concerns. The Austin rollout, which began in June 2025, operates with safety operators in the front passenger seat and is limited to downtown areas and main corridors, far from the fully autonomous vision CEO Elon Musk has long promoted. Musk has also indicated plans to expand the service to Florida and Arizona, where Tesla has started the certification process to test and operate robotaxis both with and without drivers. Despite years of development and bold
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslarobotaxiself-driving-technologytransportation-technologydriver-assistance-systemsPolestar 3 — First Road Trip - CleanTechnica
The article provides an in-depth first-hand account of a 2,160-mile road trip in the 2025 Polestar 3, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses compared to the Tesla Model Y. The Polestar 3 excels as a road trip vehicle, offering superior comfort thanks to its air suspension and a strong charge curve that supports longer driving ranges. Despite having a larger battery (107 kWh usable vs. Tesla’s 75 kWh), the Polestar is less efficient, consuming about 390 Wh/mi compared to Tesla’s 330 Wh/mi, but it still achieves a longer practical highway range of approximately 275 miles versus the Model Y’s 225 miles. Compatibility with Tesla Superchargers via an adapter is a notable advantage, although charging infrastructure like Electrify America requires improvement. The vehicle’s software and driver assistance features present a mixed experience. The Pilot Assist lane-keeping system is generally better than Tesla’s Autopilot in some respects but suffers from overly aggressive and sometimes
energyelectric-vehiclesdriver-assistance-systemscharging-infrastructureautonomous-drivingautomotive-technologyPolestar-3BYD Seal 6 DM-1 Variant — 2,000 Kilometer Range, $15,340. Anybody Want One? - CleanTechnica
The BYD Seal 6 DM-1 Variant is a new plug-in hybrid wagon from Chinese automaker BYD, offering an impressive total range of up to 2,000 km (1,240 miles) under the Chinese testing standard. Measuring 4.8 meters (16 feet) long, it seats five passengers and provides substantial cargo space—670 liters (23 cubic feet) with seats up and 1,535 liters (54 cubic feet) with the rear seats folded—comparable to or exceeding some electric SUVs like the Chevy Equinox EV. The vehicle is available in three trim levels starting at approximately $15,320, featuring BYD’s fifth-generation plug-in hybrid system with a 1.5-liter naturally aspirated engine paired with electric motors of varying power outputs (120 kW or 160 kW) and battery capacities (10 kWh or 18.7 kWh). The base model delivers about 80 km (50 miles) of electric-only range and
energyelectric-vehiclesbattery-technologyplug-in-hybridBYDautomotive-technologydriver-assistance-systemsFeds question Ford in hands-free driving investigation
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has intensified its investigation into Ford's hands-free driver-assistance system, BlueCruise, following two fatal crashes in early 2024 involving stationary vehicles. On June 18, the NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) sent Ford a detailed letter containing 25 questions about BlueCruise, including requests for a list of equipped vehicles, internal documents related to the crashes, software development details, and any changes made to the system. This marks the first formal information request since the investigation was escalated to an “engineering analysis” in January—a necessary step before a potential recall can be mandated. Ford is cooperating with the investigation and must respond by August 6 or face civil penalties. BlueCruise is a hands-free driving system available on select Ford models such as the Explorer, Expedition, F-150, and Mustang Mach-E, designed for use on pre-mapped highways. It uses cameras, radar, and an
robotautonomous-vehiclesdriver-assistance-systemsBlueCruiseautomotive-technologysafety-investigationvehicle-sensorsTesla’s robotaxis have already caught the attention of federal safety regulators
Federal safety regulators, specifically the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), have contacted Tesla following the launch of its branded robotaxi service in South Austin. This outreach came after numerous online videos appeared to show Tesla robotaxis violating traffic laws, including speeding and sudden, unexplained braking near police vehicles. NHTSA confirmed it is gathering additional information and emphasized its role in enforcing vehicle safety laws through a data-driven, risk-based investigative process, noting that it does not pre-approve new vehicle technologies but investigates potential safety defects after incidents are reported. Tesla’s robotaxi service, which began rides for invited customers, represents the first real-world test of the company’s autonomous vehicle technology. Unlike Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software sold to vehicle owners—which requires driver supervision—the robotaxis use an unsupervised version of FSD, although Tesla has not disclosed specific software details. Despite the autonomous operation, a human safety monitor is present in the front passenger seat during rides
robotautonomous-vehiclesTeslarobotaxistransportation-technologyvehicle-safetydriver-assistance-systems