RIEM News LogoRIEM News

Articles tagged with "climate-policy"

  • A Year of Oversight & Accountability: Sierra Club FOIAs Have Uncovered Oil & Gas Handouts, Canceled Grants, Opposition to Whitewashing of History, & More - CleanTechnica

    The Sierra Club’s Environmental Law Program has spent the first year of Donald Trump’s second term aggressively using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to expose the Trump Administration’s close ties to the fossil fuel industry and its impact on environmental policy. Their efforts revealed that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted numerous exemptions to coal, steel, and chemical industries from Clean Air Act pollution controls. Additionally, the Department of the Interior cut thousands of critical jobs, including park rangers and science technicians, while also attempting to rewrite American history in national parks. The EPA also canceled grants aimed at helping lower-income communities cope with climate and environmental risks. In response to the administration’s frequent failure to comply with FOIA requests, the Sierra Club filed multiple lawsuits against various agencies, including the Department of the Interior, the Office of Management and Budget, and others, seeking records on funding freezes, external communications, and political appointees’ activities. These legal actions have resulted in the release of hundreds of emails,

    energyfossil-fuelsenvironmental-regulationClean-Air-ActSierra-Clubclimate-policyenvironmental-law
  • What Mark Carney Told The World In Davos This Week - CleanTechnica

    In his address at Davos, Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England and current prime minister of Canada, emphasized the erosion of the rules-based international order that has underpinned global stability for decades. He highlighted the growing great power rivalry and the fading influence of established international norms, warning that the old system—where countries complied with shared rules for mutual benefit—is breaking down. Carney invoked Václav Havel’s concept of “living within a lie,” describing how nations and companies have maintained a fragile global order by outwardly conforming to rules they privately recognize as flawed or unevenly applied. However, he argued that this compliance can no longer be sustained as the system’s contradictions become untenable. Carney pointed out that the previous era of American-led hegemony provided public goods such as open sea lanes, financial stability, and collective security, which allowed middle powers like Canada to thrive under a predictable framework. Yet, recent crises in finance, health, energy, and

    energyclean-energyfossil-fuelsclimate-policysustainable-developmentenergy-transitionenvironmental-leadership
  • Trump 2.0 Is Killing Us With His Assault On Climate - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critically examines the environmental and climate policy impacts of President Donald J. Trump’s second term, labeling it as a severe setback for climate action in the United States. It highlights that the Trump administration has actively rejected emissions reduction policies, instead promoting increased fossil fuel use, which poses an existential threat to human health and the planet’s future. Nearly 300 actions by the Trump–Vance administration have been identified that scale back or eliminate federal climate mitigation and adaptation efforts, including the withdrawal of subsidies for renewable energy, dismantling of climate science agencies, and weakening of pollution standards. The administration’s approach is described as anti-science and authoritarian, with significant damage done to federal scientific institutions and international climate commitments. The article contrasts Trump 2.0’s climate denial and fossil fuel agenda with the prior progress under President Joe Biden, who had advanced robust climate policies such as stricter pollution standards and clean energy initiatives. Despite the historic significance of the Inflation Reduction Act in promoting climate action

    energyclimate-changeclean-energyrenewable-energyfossil-fuelsclimate-policyenvironmental-policy
  • Environmental “Protection” Agency to Stop Considering Health Impacts of Pollution - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica reports that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under the Trump administration, has announced a policy shift to stop considering the health impacts of pollution in its regulatory decisions. This move is characterized as a significant rollback of public health protections, prioritizing the interests of fossil fuel companies over the wellbeing of American communities. Lee Zeldin is mentioned as a figure supporting these changes, which align with broader efforts by the administration to dismantle environmental safeguards. Patrick Drupp, Climate Policy Director at the Sierra Club, strongly criticizes the EPA’s new stance, calling it a betrayal of the agency’s mission to protect public health and the environment. He emphasizes that the administration’s actions favor corporate polluters at the expense of community health and future generations. The Sierra Club, highlighted in the article, is described as a major grassroots environmental organization dedicated to promoting clean energy, safeguarding health, and preserving natural spaces through activism and advocacy. The article underscores widespread concern among environmental groups about the EPA’s policy

    energyenvironmental-policypollutionclean-energyfossil-fuelspublic-healthclimate-policy
  • Peak Oil Is Not Dead: Reviewing the IEA's World Energy Outlook for 2025 - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica critically examines the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) World Energy Outlook 2025, particularly addressing the recent media hype claiming that “Peak Oil” is dead due to forecasts of oil demand growing through 2050. This interpretation stems from the IEA’s reintroduction of the “Current Policies Scenario” (CPS), which assumes no new climate policies beyond those already enacted, leading to continued oil demand growth. However, the article emphasizes that this scenario is politically influenced, notably by U.S. government pressure under the Trump administration, which reversed prior climate initiatives and pushed the IEA to include a more oil-positive forecast. In contrast, the “Stated Policies Scenario” (STEPS), which accounts for announced but not yet implemented policies, still predicts oil demand peaking around 2030 and then declining, consistent with previous outlooks. The article argues that forecasts based solely on current policies (CPS) are increasingly obsolete because they fail to capture the dynamic

    energyoil-demandIEA-World-Energy-Outlookpeak-oilrenewable-energyclimate-policyenergy-forecast
  • As EU waters down 2035 EV goals, electric startups express concern

    The European Commission has softened its original plan to ban the sale of gas-powered cars by 2035, now allowing up to 10% of new car sales to be hybrids or other non-zero-emission vehicles, provided manufacturers purchase carbon offsets. This shift aims to offer flexibility to traditional European automakers, who have lobbied for more time to transition beyond hybrids amid stiff competition from Tesla and affordable electric vehicles from China. The revised policy, if approved by the European Parliament, reflects a balancing act between maintaining competitiveness and pursuing environmental goals but has sparked concern and division among electric vehicle (EV) startups and climate-focused investors. Critics, including EV startups and venture capitalists, argue that watering down the 2035 zero-emission target risks Europe losing leadership in the global EV market and undermining long-term industrial competitiveness. Signatories of the “Take Charge Europe” open letter, which includes executives from various EV-related companies, urged the Commission to maintain its original ambitious goals. Some established automakers

    energyelectric-vehiclesEV-startupsEuropean-Commissionzero-emissionclimate-policyautomotive-industry
  • Financial Markets Already Pricing The Fossil Fuel Phaseout - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the disconnect between the perceived failure of COP30, held in Brazil, and the actual financial market trends indicating a shift away from fossil fuels. Despite the conference’s weak outcomes and environmental controversies, a recent Morgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing survey of 950 institutional investors across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific reveals that 80% plan to increase sustainable investments in the next two years. This shift is driven not by political declarations but by mandates, risk models, and capital allocation decisions that are redirecting funds away from fossil fuel assets with declining transition credibility. The survey included large asset owners and managers controlling tens of trillions of dollars, signaling that the fossil fuel phaseout is already underway through market mechanisms rather than political consensus. The article also highlights that while COP conferences require consensus—often giving veto power to fossil fuel-producing nations—a coalition of 80 countries at COP30 has chosen to pursue a separate path away from fossil fuel dependency. This coalition plans a follow-up conference co-hosted

    energyfossil-fuel-phaseoutsustainable-investingclimate-policyCOP30renewable-energy-transitionESG-investing
  • EV Enthusiasts Are Losing The Battle In The USA Right Now — Why? - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the contrasting trajectories of electric vehicle (EV) adoption in China, Europe, and the United States, attributing much of the disparity to political leadership and policy decisions. China, under President Xi Jinping since 2013, has aggressively pursued cleantech policies, becoming the global leader in solar, wind, and EV markets, with over half of global EV sales occurring there. European countries have similarly implemented strong CO2 emissions regulations and supported EV adoption, resulting in significant plugin vehicle sales. In contrast, the U.S. has experienced inconsistent leadership on climate and cleantech issues, with political shifts often undermining progress. The article critiques past U.S. presidents who either failed to prioritize or actively hindered cleantech advancement. While President Obama initiated important stimulus efforts and regulatory measures to promote EVs and sustainable industries, subsequent leadership under Donald Trump reversed many of these gains by deregulating industries, subsidizing fossil fuels, and attacking EV initiatives. Despite President Biden’s

    energyelectric-vehiclesclean-technologyclimate-policyrenewable-energyEV-adoptionenvironmental-regulation
  • Sierra Club Delivers Over 1,000 Comments on Unlawful NY State Energy Plan to Hochul’s NYC Office - CleanTechnica

    The Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter delivered over 1,000 public comments opposing New York State’s Draft Energy Plan to Governor Hochul’s NYC office, highlighting widespread concern that the plan undermines the state’s climate commitments and could increase energy costs for residents. The comments, the most submitted by any environmental group and third overall, were accompanied by in-person testimonies from over 50 Sierra Club members at hearings statewide. The organization’s Environmental Law Program also submitted a detailed critique, arguing that the draft plan weakens emission-reduction targets, delays decarbonization efforts, and relies too heavily on costly fossil fuels, which threatens both public health and climate resilience. Sierra Club leaders emphasized that the Draft Plan fails to meet the mandates of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) and lacks a viable funding mechanism for the clean energy transition that protects working families. They urged Governor Hochul to implement a Cap and Invest program to lower electricity bills and accelerate renewable energy adoption. The group also called for

    energyclean-energyclimate-policyemissions-reductionNew-York-Statefossil-fuelsenergy-bills
  • Uber Abandons EVs & Climate, After Cozying Up With Trump - CleanTechnica

    The article criticizes Uber for abandoning its earlier commitments to electric vehicle (EV) adoption and climate-friendly policies. Initially, Uber had set ambitious goals to transition to 100% electric fleets in key markets like London by 2024 and North America and Europe by 2030, alongside providing drivers with EV incentives. However, the company has since dropped these targets, canceled monthly EV bonuses for drivers, and is now opposing local regulations that mandate ride-hailing companies to electrify their fleets, such as California’s law requiring 90% electrification by 2030. This reversal has contributed to a doubling of Uber’s carbon emissions over the past three years, resulting in a climate footprint larger than that of Denmark. The article also highlights Uber’s political alignment with the Trump administration, notably CEO Dara Khosrowshahi’s support for the “Big Beautiful Bill,” which the League of Conservation Voters deems “the most anti-environmental bill of all time.” This legislation undermines EV-support

    energyelectric-vehiclesUberclimate-policyemissionsclean-technologytransportation-electrification
  • Sierra Club Statement on Arctic Refuge CRA Vote - CleanTechnica

    The article reports that Senate Republicans advanced a resolution using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to revoke a 2024 land management plan protecting millions of acres in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The resolution passed 49-45, with Republican Senator Susan Collins joining Democrats in opposition. The vote threatens critical habitat for species such as caribou, migratory birds, and polar bears. This marks an unprecedented use of the CRA, a Clinton-era law traditionally used to overturn administrative rules, now applied to resource management plans. A similar resolution targeting protections for the Western Arctic also passed recently and awaits presidential approval. Athan Manuel, Director of the Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program, condemned the vote, accusing Senate Republicans and the Trump administration of prioritizing corporate interests over environmental and Indigenous concerns. He emphasized the Arctic Refuge’s importance as one of the last wild places in the U.S., vital to the Gwich’in people and wildlife like the Porcupine caribou herd. The Sierra Club, a

    energyenvironmental-protectionoil-and-gas-leasingArctic-Refugepublic-landsclimate-policySierra-Club
  • Stellantis Pushes for More Pollution & Climate Idiocy in EU - CleanTechnica

    The article criticizes Stellantis, a major multinational automaker, for lobbying to weaken the European Union’s stringent vehicle emissions regulations set to take effect in about a decade. Despite clear evidence of growing electric vehicle (EV) adoption worldwide—highlighted by Tesla’s success with the Model 3 and Model Y, Norway’s near 100% EV adoption, and China’s over 50% plugin vehicle market share—Stellantis and some European governments, notably Germany and Italy, are pushing to soften these climate policies. Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa and Chairman John Elkann argue that strict emissions rules threaten the European auto industry's growth and could lead to its “irreversible decline,” framing the issue as a need to protect legacy automakers rather than embracing innovation. The article strongly rejects Stellantis’s position, labeling it as regressive and disconnected from climate science and public health imperatives. It suggests that Stellantis’s difficulties in producing competitive EVs reflect leadership and innovation failures rather than a flaw in policy

    energyelectric-vehiclesemissions-regulationsclimate-policyautomotive-industryEU-regulationspollution-control
  • A Pipeline That Won't Be Built and the Real Trade Beneath the Canadian Climate Deal - CleanTechnica

    The article analyzes the Canadian Smith Carney memorandum of understanding (MOU) concerning climate policy and a new crude oil pipeline, challenging the initial perception that the federal government is retreating on climate commitments in exchange for pipeline support. Instead, it argues the deal represents a political compromise where symbolic backing for a pipeline—unlikely to be constructed given market realities and financing challenges—is traded for concrete improvements in industrial carbon pricing and methane emissions control. The pipeline primarily exists in political rhetoric rather than in capital markets or regulatory feasibility, making the climate setbacks smaller than they appear, while the environmental gains may be more significant than commonly recognized. The piece contextualizes the current deal by revisiting the earlier agreement between Alberta Premier Rachel Notley and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, which balanced Alberta’s introduction of a carbon price and emissions caps with federal support for the Trans Mountain Expansion pipeline. While that deal initially made sense as it brought Alberta into a national climate framework, the federal government’s later decision to purchase and develop the pipeline transformed it

    energyclimate-policycarbon-pricingmethane-controloil-pipelineTrans-Mountain-ExpansionCanadian-energy-infrastructure
  • Ottawa-Alberta "grand bargain” could trade away Canada’s climate framework if firm negotiations don’t follow - Clean Energy Canada

    The recent memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the federal government and Alberta on energy policy presents both opportunities and risks for Canada’s climate framework, according to Rachel Doran, executive director at Clean Energy Canada. While the deal includes promising commitments such as Alberta’s pledge to increase its industrial carbon price to $130 per tonne—higher than the federal backstop price scheduled for next year—there is concern that without firm federal negotiations, key federal climate regulations like the Clean Electricity Regulations, oil and gas emissions caps, and methane regulations could be weakened. Doran warns that granting exemptions to one province risks undermining the durability of national regulations, as other provinces may seek similar carveouts. The agreement also highlights potential benefits in electricity infrastructure, including transmission interties between British Columbia and Saskatchewan and commitments to add thousands of megawatts of clean power. This could enhance Canada’s energy security, lower household energy costs, and build on existing renewable strengths such as hydro, solar, wind, and battery storage. However

    energyclean-energycarbon-pricingclimate-policyelectricity-regulationsindustrial-emissionsenergy-infrastructure
  • Ambitious Car CO2 Standards More Important Than Ever After Lawmakers Vote To Weaken 2040 Target - CleanTechnica

    EU lawmakers have voted to weaken the 2040 climate emissions reduction target from 90% to 85%, signaling continued commitment to climate action but with less ambition. Alongside this, the implementation of the EU’s carbon pricing mechanism on road and heating fossil fuels (ETS2) has been delayed by one year. While this delay is seen as a setback by environmental groups like Transport & Environment (T&E), it is considered preferable to a proposed three-year postponement that would have significantly reduced government revenues and increased ETS prices. T&E emphasizes that despite these setbacks, member states must use ETS2 revenues proactively to support low- and middle-income households and invest in green technologies. The weakening of the 2040 target and the ETS2 delay underscore the heightened importance of maintaining ambitious car CO2 standards, which provide a clearer and more immediate signal to businesses and consumers about Europe’s green transition. T&E warns that diluting these foundational elements of the EU Green Deal risks prolonging dependence on volatile fossil fuel

    energycarbon-emissionsEU-Green-Dealclimate-policyrenewable-energycarbon-pricinggreen-technologies
  • Trump’s Hatred of EVs Is Making Gas Cars More Expensive

    The article discusses how former President Donald Trump’s opposition to electric vehicles (EVs) and environmental regulations is paradoxically contributing to higher costs for gasoline-powered cars. While Trump has framed efficiency and climate policies as burdensome and costly, his administration’s rollback of vehicle emissions and efficiency standards has created regulatory uncertainty that complicates automakers’ planning and development processes. This regulatory “whiplash,” with standards tightening under Obama and Biden and loosening under Trump, forces car manufacturers to repeatedly adjust their strategies, increasing development costs that are ultimately passed on to consumers. As a result, new car prices have risen, with the average sticker price surpassing $50,000. Moreover, the Trump administration’s elimination of EV tax incentives and reduced support for domestic battery production have hindered the growth of the electric vehicle market in the U.S., further complicating the auto industry’s transition to cleaner technologies. The Environmental Protection Agency’s recent moves to weaken its authority to regulate vehicle emissions undermine efforts to reduce carbon pollution from

    energyelectric-vehiclesautomotive-industryenvironmental-regulationsfuel-efficiencyclimate-policyvehicle-emissions
  • Canada’s New Budget Has Billions in Fossil Subsidies Disguised As Climate Action - CleanTechnica

    Canada’s recent federal budget, introduced under Mark Carney, emphasizes continuity in climate-related policies rather than new initiatives, particularly extending existing tax credits for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) and clean hydrogen through 2035 and beyond. The budget maintains substantial financial incentives—up to billions in deferred revenue—primarily benefiting fossil fuel-linked projects. Notably, the Pathways oil sands hub in Alberta could receive around $800 million annually if fully realized, with other fossil-related projects like Shell’s Polaris and Entropy’s Glacier also capturing significant shares of the credits. Non-fossil industrial users receive a much smaller portion of the support. The policy treats all captured CO₂ equally, regardless of source or economic viability, which raises concerns about effectiveness. Carbon capture makes the most sense for industries with pure or nearly pure CO₂ streams, low-cost nearby storage, and processes that cannot easily switch to electrification—such as cement production, exemplified by Heidelberg Materials’ project in Edmonton,

    energycarbon-captureclean-hydrogenfossil-fuel-subsidiesclimate-policyCanada-budgetclean-electricity
  • Weakening The EU 2040 Target Would Fail To Deliver Clear Signal To Businesses & Consumers - CleanTechnica

    EU government ministers have agreed to a weakened 2040 emissions reduction target of 85%, allowing up to 5% of this reduction to be achieved through international carbon credits. This dilution of the target has raised concerns from Transport & Environment (T&E), which argues that it undermines Europe’s climate leadership and creates uncertainty for investments in green technologies. The reliance on international carbon credits, unless they meet stringent eligibility criteria, risks slowing down the transition to a sustainable economy. Additionally, the EU has delayed the implementation of the ETS2 carbon pricing system on road and heating fossil fuels by one year. T&E warns that this postponement will deprive governments of crucial revenues needed to fund green technology investments and support low- and middle-income households during the transition. Federico Terreni of T&E emphasized that weakening the 2040 target and delaying ETS2 jeopardizes both climate goals and energy security, urging the European Parliament to oppose the delay and uphold ambitious car CO2 standards to provide clear signals to businesses and

    energyEU-emissions-targetcarbon-reductiongreen-technologiesETS2climate-policyrenewable-energy
  • US Climate Groups Ready To Battle Trump Policies At UN Climate Summit COP30 - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the absence of official U.S. government representation at the upcoming COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, due to the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, which will not be official until 2026. This lack of presence from the U.S., described by EU Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra as dampening the summit’s mood, reflects the administration’s longstanding skepticism toward climate science and policies. Despite this, U.S. climate advocacy groups, coalitions, and local leaders remain committed to advancing climate goals, aiming to fill the void left by federal disengagement. They emphasize continuing efforts toward net-zero emissions and sustainable finance, positioning themselves as proactive leaders in the global climate movement. A coalition of over 100 local U.S. leaders, including governors and mayors affiliated with groups such as America Is All In, Climate Mayors, and the U.S. Climate Alliance, plans to attend COP30. These leaders intend to demonstrate that the Trump administration does not

    energyclimate-changeCOP30Paris-Agreementsustainable-financerenewable-energyclimate-policy
  • Why Is 1.5°C (2.7°F) Not Just An Abstract Number For Global Warming Limits? - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica emphasizes that the 1.5°C (2.7°F) global warming limit is not merely an abstract figure but a critical threshold with profound real-world consequences. Crossing this limit risks severe climate impacts such as intensified droughts, heatwaves, floods, displacement of communities, agricultural failures, and political instability. Drawing on data from 25 countries, a report titled "A Climate for Sufficiency" highlights how current per-person emissions far exceed the levels compatible with this target and explores the concept of the "Fair Consumption Space." This space balances an ecological ceiling—maximum emissions to limit warming to 1.5°C—and a social floor—minimum emissions needed to ensure dignity, health, and social participation—underscoring the importance of equity in climate action. The report stresses that lifestyles, shaped by infrastructure, policies, and social norms, drive emissions and that systemic changes are necessary because carbon-intensive pathways are embedded in current systems. It calls for reducing excessive consumption in wealth

    energyclimate-changeglobal-warmingcarbon-emissionssustainabilityclimate-policyenvironmental-impact
  • ETS2 Reform Will Limit Price Spikes and Make Redistribution Easier, Says T&E - CleanTechnica

    The European Commission has confirmed measures to stabilize prices under the upcoming ETS2 carbon pricing scheme, which targets road and heating fuels. To prevent price spikes, a price cap mechanism will allow additional emission allowances to be released if the carbon price exceeds €45 per ton of CO₂. This approach aims to provide price certainty for households and businesses while keeping prices aligned with current carbon prices in countries like Germany and France. Additionally, a frontloading mechanism will enable member states to auction emission allowances as early as 2026, generating revenues ahead of the ETS2’s 2027 launch. Transport & Environment (T&E) welcomes these reforms, emphasizing that the early revenue generation can help governments fund support measures for low and middle-income families. Such measures include making greener alternatives like public transport and electric vehicle leasing more affordable, facilitating a just transition away from fossil fuels. T&E urges governments to act decisively to implement redistribution policies and complementary actions to assist vulnerable households and small businesses as the carbon price takes effect. The

    energycarbon-pricingEU-ETS2clean-transportrenewable-energyclimate-policyemissions-trading-system
  • From Steward to Saboteur: America’s Role in the Failure to Govern the Maritime Commons - CleanTechnica

    The article discusses the recent failure of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to adopt a global carbon-pricing mechanism for the shipping industry, highlighting it as a contemporary example of Garrett Hardin’s “tragedy of the commons.” The ocean, serving as a shared resource and waste sink, suffers from overuse as nations prioritize short-term economic benefits from cheap fossil-fuel-driven trade while deferring the long-term environmental costs globally. The proposed carbon levy, part of the IMO’s Net-Zero Framework, aimed to price emissions and fund cleaner fuel infrastructure, but collapsed primarily due to heavy lobbying by the United States, which warned smaller countries of trade and diplomatic repercussions. Saudi Arabia and some allies supported the U.S. stance, framing the levy as a threat to competitiveness, resulting in a one-year postponement and a missed opportunity to align maritime shipping with global climate goals. The article further explores differing ideological interpretations of Hardin’s tragedy of the commons. Classical economists see the failure as a pricing problem solv

    energymaritime-industrycarbon-pricingclimate-policyInternational-Maritime-Organizationfossil-fuelsenvironmental-regulation
  • The European Union's Zero-Emission Trajectory Seems To Be On Track - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica analyzes the European Union’s progress toward its ambitious climate goal of achieving zero emissions from new passenger cars by 2035, based on a detailed report by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). The EU has set stringent CO2 reduction targets—55% by 2030 and 100% by 2035—under Regulation 2019/631. The report highlights significant momentum driven by regulatory pressure and technological advances, with average CO2 emissions from new cars steadily declining since 2009 and accelerating recently. By mid-2025, battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) accounted for 17% of new car registrations, with major automakers like BMW and Mercedes already meeting or nearing their CO2 targets. However, the transition is uneven across member states, with countries like Germany and France leading, while Italy and Spain lag behind, underscoring the importance of national incentives alongside EU-wide policies. Economically, the shift to electric vehicles is increasingly attractive to

    energyelectric-vehiclesEU-emissions-targetsclean-transportationbattery-electric-vehiclesclimate-policyautomotive-industry
  • Leaked Car Industry Paper: Carmakers’ EU Demands Would Cut EV Sales In Half - CleanTechnica

    A leaked position paper from the European car industry lobby ACEA reveals that carmakers are pushing for numerous loopholes in the EU’s car CO2 regulations, which aim to mandate only zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) sales by 2035. According to analysis by Transport & Environment (T&E), these demands would significantly weaken the EU’s climate ambitions, potentially halving the share of electric vehicle (EV) sales. Key loopholes include counting cars running on so-called carbon-neutral fuels (such as biofuels or e-fuels) as zero-emission, which alone could reduce EV sales by 25%. Additional demands include scrapping the 2027 utility factor adjustment for plug-in hybrids, granting CO2 credits for scrapping old cars, and credits for CO2 reductions in car production, cumulatively lowering the EV market share target to just 52% by 2035. T&E’s Lucien Mathieu criticized the ACEA’s position as undermining investment certainty and Europe’s competitiveness

    energyelectric-vehiclesEU-regulationscarbon-emissionsautomotive-industryclimate-policyclean-technology
  • Carbon Leakage in the Aviation Sector: Is it a problem, and if so, what can be done to address it? - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica examines the issue of carbon leakage in the aviation sector, particularly in relation to the European Union’s climate policies such as the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Fit for 55 package. Carbon leakage occurs when emissions shift outside regulated areas to avoid compliance costs, for example, passengers choosing connecting flights through non-EU hubs like Istanbul, Doha, or Dubai to bypass EU climate charges. However, recent analyses commissioned by Transport & Environment (T&E) and conducted by CE Delft and Lexavia Aviation Consultants reveal that the risk of carbon leakage in aviation is minimal. At most, only about 3% of the expected 38.4 million tons of CO2 emissions savings by 2035 could be lost due to leakage, indicating that EU climate measures remain largely effective. The risk is mainly concentrated on a few long-haul routes, and expanding the EU ETS to all departing flights would only marginally increase ticket prices by 2-6%, with non-E

    energycarbon-leakageaviation-emissionsEU-Emissions-Trading-Systemsustainable-aviation-fuelclimate-policycarbon-pricing
  • Pope Leo Speaks About Climate Change. Is Anyone Listening? - CleanTechnica

    On October 1, 2025, Pope Leo delivered a passionate address at Castel Gandolfo, marking the 10th anniversary of Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’, which called for the protection of the Earth. Drawing on Saint Francis of Assisi’s canticle praising “Sister, Mother Earth,” Pope Leo emphasized humanity’s responsibility to care for the environment, lamenting how humans have exploited nature and caused widespread ecological harm. He highlighted that the environmental challenges identified a decade ago remain urgent and even more relevant today, urging all sectors of society—including NGOs, advocacy groups, and citizens—to pressure governments into adopting and enforcing stronger environmental regulations. Pope Leo’s message implicitly countered recent climate change denial rhetoric from certain political leaders, underscoring the need for a collective change of heart. He criticized those who dismiss climate science or blame the poor for environmental degradation and called on Christians to align their faith with active care for creation. The Pope stressed that loving God requires respecting and protecting all

    energyclimate-changeenvironmental-protectionsustainabilityrenewable-energycarbon-emissionsclimate-policy
  • The EPA Is Ending Greenhouse Gas Data Collection. Who Will Step Up to Fill the Gap?

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced it will cease requiring polluting companies to report their greenhouse gas emissions, effectively ending the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). This move, initiated under the Trump administration, removes a critical federal tool used to monitor emissions and inform climate policy. Experts, including former EPA official Joseph Goffman, warn that this decision severely hampers the government's ability to formulate effective climate strategies, as the GHGRP data is essential for understanding emission sources, tracking industry decarbonization, and assessing new emissions-reduction technologies. The program also supports international commitments under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and aids state and local policymakers in setting and monitoring emissions targets. While nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and technology advancements, such as AI-driven emissions tracking and satellite data, offer some potential to fill the data void, experts agree these efforts cannot fully replace the EPA’s comprehensive and authoritative data collection. Groups like Climate TRACE, a coalition using satellite imagery and

    energygreenhouse-gas-emissionsclimate-policyenvironmental-monitoringdata-collectionemission-reduction-technologiesartificial-intelligence
  • European Aviation Set to Spend Billions on Offsetting Schemes - CleanTechnica

    The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is currently reviewing its progress toward the Long Term Aspirational Goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 during its 42nd General Assembly. A key focus is on CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation), designed to complement other emissions reduction efforts in aviation. However, CORSIA has so far failed to stabilize aviation CO2 emissions or significantly promote green technologies like sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and zero-emission planes. A recent Transport & Environment (T&E) analysis criticizes CORSIA as an expensive distraction, estimating that European aviation could spend between €7 billion and €43 billion on offsetting projects over the next decade, with minimal climate or local community benefits. Moreover, due to its design, CORSIA will only offset about 26% of EU international aviation emissions by 2035. The article highlights concerns about ICAO’s governance, noting significant industry influence from fossil fuel companies and airlines,

    energycarbon-offsettingaviation-emissionssustainable-aviation-fuelsclimate-policyEU-ETSnet-zero-carbon-emissions
  • Mark Carney could make it easier for us to buy EVs if he wanted. Right now he’s making it harder - Clean Energy Canada

    The article discusses the recent pause on Canada’s Electric Vehicle (EV) Availability Standard until 2027, included in the government’s tariff relief package, and the concerns it raises among climate advocates. The EV Availability Standard is a key consumer-focused policy that requires automakers to offer more electric vehicles over time, thereby encouraging the production of more affordable EV models and increasing market availability. Research indicates that such mandates reduce EV prices by about 20% and lead to a greater variety of EV models compared to regions without such standards. The article argues that abandoning this policy would be detrimental, especially since Canada cannot rely on aligning with U.S. tailpipe emission standards due to political uncertainty and potential rollbacks under the Trump administration. The article also addresses alternative proposals like investing in public EV charging infrastructure or including conventional hybrids in the policy, but finds these insufficient substitutes. Most EV charging occurs conveniently at home, and Canada’s public charging network is already expanding rapidly, partly driven by the certainty the EV mandate provides to investors

    energyelectric-vehiclesclean-energyEV-chargingclimate-policygovernment-regulationsustainable-transportation
  • US Taxpayers Will Pay Billions in New Fossil Fuel Subsidies Thanks to the Big Beautiful Bill

    A recent report reveals that the Trump administration has introduced nearly $40 billion in new federal subsidies for oil, gas, and coal in 2025 through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, increasing annual fossil fuel subsidies by about $4 billion over the next decade. This addition raises the total federal support for domestic fossil fuels to at least $34.8 billion per year, marking the largest single-year increase in fossil fuel subsidies since at least 2017. These subsidies build on longstanding tax breaks, some dating back over a century, such as the 1913 deduction for drilling expenses, highlighting the entrenched nature of fossil fuel support in U.S. policy. Efforts to reduce fossil fuel subsidies have faced significant political obstacles. Although President Biden initially pledged to eliminate certain fossil fuel tax breaks to raise $35 billion over ten years, these plans were abandoned during climate legislation negotiations with Senator Joe Manchin, a key swing vote with ties to the coal industry. The resulting Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

    energyfossil-fuelssubsidiesoil-and-gascarbon-captureclimate-policyrenewable-energy
  • Climate Scientists, Epstein Survivors Speak Out: This Is No Hoax - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the ongoing conflict between climate science and political denialism, particularly under the Trump administration. It underscores how former President Donald Trump repeatedly dismissed climate change as a "hoax," a stance that resonated with many of his supporters despite overwhelming scientific consensus on the issue. The piece notes that while climate-related disasters are increasingly impacting millions of Americans, climate science remains a low priority for much of the US electorate, suggesting that meaningful political action on climate change is unlikely in the near term. A significant focus of the article is the controversy surrounding a July report released by the US Department of Energy under the Trump administration. The report was widely criticized by over 85 climate experts for misrepresenting scientific data, cherry-picking information, and failing to reflect the current understanding of climate change. This critique was echoed by major media outlets like CBS News and even Fox News, which highlighted the report’s flaws and the questionable backgrounds of its contributors, all of whom have histories of disputing climate

    energyclimate-changeDepartment-of-Energyenvironmental-scienceclimate-policyrenewable-energyclimate-crisis
  • Carbon Removal India Alliance: India's Carbon & CDR Policy Update H1 - 2025 - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica, curated with the Carbon Removal India Alliance (CRIA), highlights significant advancements in India’s climate policy landscape in the first half of 2025. Key developments include the introduction of mandatory Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity (GEI) targets under the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) for five high-emission sectors—Aluminum, Iron & Steel, Petroleum Refineries, Petrochemicals, and Textiles. This policy enables entities that exceed targets to earn tradable carbon credits, while those that fall short must purchase credits or face penalties, marking a critical step in operationalizing India’s carbon market. The draft notification is currently open for public comment. Additionally, India and Japan are finalizing a Joint Credit Mechanism (JCM) under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, allowing Japanese firms to invest in carbon-reduction technologies in India, particularly in solar energy, green hydrogen, and sustainable aviation fuel. This bilateral cooperation aims to attract international

    energycarbon-removalclimate-policycarbon-marketsclean-energydecarbonizationbiochar
  • The Thing Pollution-Heads Celebrating Climate-Policy Sabotage Don't Understand - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica criticizes the Trump administration's efforts to undermine renewable energy and electric vehicle (EV) initiatives by cancelling incentives and rolling back regulations. It highlights that despite these political setbacks, the global transition to cleantech—particularly EVs and renewable energy—is inevitable and accelerating. The piece argues that while oil-rich nations, including the U.S., currently wield significant economic and political influence, their dominance will diminish as other countries, especially China and Europe, advance more rapidly in cleantech innovation and adoption. The author warns that the U.S. risks falling behind in the global clean technology race if it continues to defund and sabotage these industries. This could relegate the country to a secondary market status for critical emerging technologies, undermining economic competitiveness. Additionally, the article underscores the public health consequences of resisting clean energy, noting increased pollution-related illnesses and premature deaths. It criticizes the influence of oil industry propaganda on public opinion and stresses that opposing cleantech development neither saves money

    energyrenewable-energyelectric-vehiclesclean-technologyclimate-policypollutionenergy-transition
  • The Federal Government Can't Prevent Asset Managers From Net Zero Investments - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica discusses the evolving stance of US asset managers and financial institutions toward net-zero investments amid political and market pressures. Despite expectations that hedge funds would be bearish on oil stocks, many have shifted focus from shorting oil to investing in renewables, particularly solar energy. This shift occurs despite the Trump administration’s rollback of climate policies and promotion of fossil fuels, which has pressured banks and investment houses to align with a fossil-fuel-centric energy paradigm. Many financial institutions had initially pledged to support the transition to a low-carbon economy in line with the Paris Agreement, but some major US and Canadian banks later withdrew from these commitments, influenced by political opposition to climate action. However, recent market dynamics are driving renewed interest in clean energy investments. Factors such as rising OPEC+ supply, slowing demand in the US and China, and US policies boosting oil supply have unsettled fossil fuel producers and lowered oil price forecasts. Meanwhile, nuanced investments in renewables continue, supported by governance models involving sustainability

    energyrenewable-energynet-zeroclean-energy-investmentssolar-powerclimate-policysustainable-finance
  • Galileo Galilei And The End Of Science - CleanTechnica

    The article "Galileo Galilei And The End Of Science" from CleanTechnica draws a historical parallel between Galileo’s conflict with the Catholic Church over scientific truth and contemporary challenges to science, particularly in environmental policy. Galileo, who invented the experimental method and confirmed the heliocentric model, faced house arrest and censorship for contradicting biblical interpretations. This tension between science and religion persists today, exemplified by groups like Answers In Genesis that reject scientific consensus on Earth’s age in favor of literal biblical chronology. The article highlights how some individuals remain unconvinced by scientific evidence, adhering instead to faith-based claims. The piece then shifts focus to recent developments at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Lee Zeldin, who is portrayed as dismissive of science in policymaking. In 2025, the EPA announced plans to cut hundreds of scientific positions, undermining independent research critical to environmental regulations on chemical risks, wildfire smoke, and water contamination. Zeldin’s rollback

    energyenvironmental-protectionEPAscientific-researchemissions-regulationsclimate-policyhazardous-chemicals
  • Tax Credits Drive Carbon Capture Deployment in US EIA Annual Energy Outlook - CleanTechnica

    The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Annual Energy Outlook 2025 (AEO2025) introduces a new Carbon Capture, Allocation, Transportation, and Sequestration (CCATS) module to model carbon capture deployment through the coming decades. The report projects that CO2 capture at electric power and industrial facilities will increase through the 2030s, primarily driven by enhanced tax credits established under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). These tax credits, which can be claimed for projects beginning construction before 2033 and last for up to 12 years after service, significantly incentivize carbon capture, with projected peak capture rates reaching between 1.5% and 3.5% of energy emissions in the late 2030s. However, CO2 capture is expected to decline after these credits expire by mid-century. The AEO2025 scenarios show variation in peak CO2 capture amounts, ranging from about 56 million metric tons (MMmt) in the Alternative Electricity case

    energycarbon-capturetax-creditscarbon-sequestrationCO2-emissionsclean-energyclimate-policy
  • In Trump’s "Big Beautiful" Bill, Ugly Contradictions & Giveaways to Oil & Gas Industry - CleanTechnica

    President Trump’s $4 trillion “Big Beautiful” spending bill, signed on July 4, contains significant contradictions regarding energy and climate policy. Despite Trump’s skepticism about climate change, the bill increases federal subsidies for carbon capture projects, but only if the captured gas is used to enhance oil and gas extraction. The legislation cuts support for wind and solar energy—some of the cheapest energy sources—leading to an expected rise in average household energy costs by about $280 annually. It also phases out subsidies for electric vehicles, clean energy, and energy-efficient appliances, while providing substantial tax breaks and subsidies to the oil and gas industry. Key giveaways to fossil fuel companies include a reduction in royalty rates for drilling on public lands from 16.7% (set by the Inflation Reduction Act under Biden) to 12.5%, and the requirement for the Department of the Interior to conduct at least 30 offshore lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico, offering a minimum of 80 million acres each. The bill

    energyoil-and-gascarbon-capturesubsidiesfederal-landsdrilling-rightsclimate-policy
  • ClimeFi Carbon Removal Market Review Q2’25: Major Buyers & CDR Policies Take Shape - CleanTechnica

    The global carbon dioxide removal (CDR) market experienced unprecedented growth in Q2 2025, with contracted volumes more than doubling from 13.5 to 29.2 million tonnes of CO₂. This surge was driven primarily by biomass carbon removal and storage (BiCRS), which accounted for 99% of the volumes, and market spending reached $3.9 billion. Corporate buyers, led by Microsoft with a 6.75 million tonne agreement, continued to dominate demand, alongside other major players like J.P. Morgan and TikTok. Despite a significant slowdown in verified credit issuance—down 86% this quarter—diversification in financing increased, with $182 million raised in equity and grants and $78 million awarded through XPRIZE. Key policy developments also shaped the market landscape. The EU’s near-final Green Claims Directive will restrict companies from claiming carbon neutrality based solely on offsets, requiring demonstrable direct emissions reductions and certified removals under the EU’s Carbon Removal Certification

    energycarbon-removalclimate-policycarbon-marketsbiomass-carbon-removalnet-zero-targetssustainable-finance
  • EU’s Reliance on Carbon Credits Risks Making a "Paper Tiger" of Europe’s Climate Efforts - CleanTechnica

    The European Commission’s commitment to a 90% emissions reduction target by 2040 aims to provide certainty for key industries such as carmakers, airlines, shipping, and fuel producers, supporting Europe’s green transition. However, the Commission’s allowance for countries to use carbon credits (offsets) to meet this target has drawn criticism from Transport & Environment (T&E). T&E warns that relying on offsets undermines the integrity of Europe’s climate efforts, contradicts previous commitments, and risks weakening climate regulations. They highlight that over 90% of rainforest carbon offsets certified by the largest certifier have been found worthless, and offsets reduce incentives to invest in proven green technologies. T&E emphasizes that a robust 2040 target is vital not only for climate goals but also for Europe’s energy security, potentially saving billions of euros annually on fossil fuel imports. Achieving the target will require resisting pressures to weaken related policies, such as the 2035 zero-emission car mandate and the ETS2 carbon

    energycarbon-creditsemissions-reductionclimate-policyEuropean-Green-Dealfossil-fuel-importsgreen-technologies
  • Mea Culpa: Biomethanol Will Be A Major Shipping Fuel - CleanTechnica

    The article recounts the author’s recent collaboration with a team of experts in the Netherlands focused on decarbonization and energy system planning for 2050. Invited by the Dutch transmission system operator TenneT, the group worked on scenario modeling to guide transmission upgrades and land use in a country with limited space, even creating new land through engineering feats. Central to their work was the Energy Transition Model (ETM), an open-source, browser-based tool developed by Amsterdam’s Quintel that allows users to simulate future energy systems by adjusting numerous parameters. The ETM’s transparency and flexibility impressed the author, highlighting its value for planning decarbonization pathways across European countries. The expert team included notable figures such as Professor Heleen de Coninck, a climate scientist and IPCC lead author specializing in technology and societal change for decarbonization; Reinier Grimbergen, a sustainability and industrial transformation expert with deep knowledge of the chemical sector; and Paul Martin, a Canadian chemical engineer experienced

    energydecarbonizationrenewable-energyenergy-transitionclimate-policysustainable-innovationcarbon-capture
  • Senate Republicans Look Ready to Kill Clean Energy & EV Tax Credits — Shocker - CleanTechnica

    The article from CleanTechnica highlights the ongoing political battle over clean energy and electric vehicle (EV) tax credits in the United States. It underscores that Republican politicians, historically funded by the fossil fuel industry, have consistently opposed legislation promoting clean energy, energy efficiency, and EV incentives despite growing evidence of environmental harm caused by fossil fuels. While Democrats enacted significant clean energy tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 when they controlled the federal government, the current Republican majority in the White House, House, and Senate is moving to repeal or drastically reduce these incentives. Recent developments indicate that the Senate Republicans are poised to phase out clean energy and energy efficiency tax credits, albeit at a slower pace than the House’s more aggressive budget bill. However, EV incentives face rapid and severe cuts. Critics, including the Natural Resources Defense Council and Senator Ron Wyden, warn that these actions will lead to higher energy prices, job losses in manufacturing, factory closures, and exacerbate the climate crisis. The article conveys

    energyclean-energyelectric-vehiclesenergy-efficiencytax-creditsclimate-policyrenewable-energy
  • The EPA Wants to Roll Back Emissions Controls on Power Plants

    The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed rolling back emissions standards for power plants, which are the second-largest source of CO2 emissions in the country. This move comes shortly after NOAA reported record-high seasonal CO2 concentrations. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin criticized previous administrations for prioritizing environmental regulations over economic growth, emphasizing the agency’s intention to support domestic fossil fuel industries, including coal, which has been in decline due to competition from natural gas and renewables. The proposed rollbacks would weaken Biden-era rules that required coal- and gas-fired power plants to reduce emissions by 90% by the early 2030s, primarily through carbon capture and storage technology. The EPA’s justification for the rollbacks includes the argument that US power sector emissions represent a small fraction (3%) of global emissions, and that continued coal use abroad diminishes the impact of US regulations on global greenhouse gas levels. However, critics highlight that the US power sector remains a major domestic polluter, ranking second only

    energyEPApower-plantsemissionscarbon-capturefossil-fuelsclimate-policy
  • EU’s New Carbon Tax (ETS2) a €300bn Opportunity to Help Transition European Citizens Away from Fossil Fuels - CleanTechnica

    energycarbon-taxgreen-infrastructureemissions-tradingelectric-mobilityfossil-fuelsclimate-policy
  • Tony Blair’s New Climate Reset Report Promotes Delay, Not Action

    energyclimate-changefossil-fuelsclimate-policytechnology-solutionssustainabilityenvironmental-impact